Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Dev Psychol. 2018 Oct;54(10):1842-1853. doi: 10.1037/dev0000562. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
We examined the development of 3 executive function (EF) components-inhibition, updating, and task shifting-over time in monolingual and bilingual school-age children. We tested 41 monolingual and 41 simultaneous bilingual typically developing children (ages 8-12) on nonverbal tasks measuring inhibition (the Flanker task), updating (the Corsi blocks task), and task shifting (the Dimensional Change Card Sort task; DCCS) at 2 time points, 1 year apart. Three indexes of task shifting (shifting, switching, and mixing costs) were derived from the DCCS task. The 2 groups did not differ in their development of updating, but did demonstrate distinct patterns of development for inhibition. Specifically, while the bilingual group demonstrated a steep improvement in inhibition from Year 1 to Year 2, the monolingual group was characterized by stable inhibition performance over this time period. The 2 groups did not differ in their developmental patterns for shifting and switching costs, but for mixing costs, the bilingual children outperformed the monolingual children in both years. Together, the findings indicate that bilingual experience may modulate the developmental rates of some components of EF but not others, resulting in specific EF performance differences between bilinguals and monolinguals only at certain developmental time points. (PsycINFO Database Record
我们考察了单语和双语学龄儿童的 3 种执行功能(EF)成分——抑制、更新和任务转换——随时间的发展。我们在 2 个时间点(相隔 1 年)对 41 名单语和 41 名同时双语的典型发育儿童(8-12 岁)进行了非言语任务测试,以测量抑制(Flanker 任务)、更新(Corsi 积木任务)和任务转换(维度变化卡片分类任务;DCCS)。从 DCCS 任务中得出了 3 种任务转换指标(转换、切换和混合成本)。这两组在更新方面的发展没有差异,但在抑制方面表现出明显不同的发展模式。具体来说,虽然双语组在从第 1 年到第 2 年的抑制能力上有显著提高,但单语组在这段时间内的抑制表现相对稳定。这两组在转换和切换成本方面的发展模式没有差异,但在混合成本方面,双语儿童在两年中都优于单语儿童。总的来说,这些发现表明,双语经验可能会调节一些 EF 成分的发展速度,但不会调节其他成分,从而导致双语者和单语者在特定的发展时间点仅在特定的 EF 表现上存在差异。