• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后恢复质量评分 QoR-15 韩国版的翻译和验证。

Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Armed Forces Daegu Hospital, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 9;2020:3456234. doi: 10.1155/2020/3456234. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/3456234
PMID:33123568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7582083/
Abstract

Quality of recovery after anesthesia is an important measure of the early postoperative health status of patients. The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire is a self-rated questionnaire used to assess the quality of postoperative recovery. This study is aimed at translating and validating the Korean version of QoR-15 (QoR-15K). One hundred fifty patients were included in this study. We translated the original version of QoR-15 into QoR-15K and evaluated its validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical feasibility. QoR-15K showed acceptable criterion, structure, and construct validities. Reliability was verified using Cronbach's (0.856), standard error of measurement (10.78), split-half reliability (0.831), test-retest reliability ( = 0.945, ≤ 0.001), and intraclass correlation test-retest ( = 0.903, ≤ 0.001). These results represent an acceptable reliability. Responsiveness was verified using Cohen's effect size (1.39), standardized response mean (1.03), and the correlation between QoR-15K score and duration of anesthesia ( = -0.197, = 0.016). These results show acceptable responsiveness. The mean ± standard deviation time to complete QoR-15K was 138.1 ± 30.7 s. QoR-15K was rated more than adequate on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. In conclusion, QoR-15K shows acceptable validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical feasibility and may help evaluate postoperative quality of recovery in Korean populations.

摘要

麻醉后恢复质量是衡量患者术后早期健康状况的重要指标。QoR-15(质量恢复-15)问卷是一种自评问卷,用于评估术后恢复质量。本研究旨在将 QoR-15(QoR-15)的韩文版进行翻译和验证。本研究共纳入 150 例患者。我们将原始版本的 QoR-15 翻译成 QoR-15K,并评估其有效性、可靠性、反应性和临床可行性。QoR-15K 表现出可接受的标准、结构和构建效度。可靠性通过 Cronbach's (0.856)、测量标准误差(10.78)、半分割可靠性(0.831)、测试-重测可靠性(=0.945,≤0.001)和组内相关测试-重测(=0.903,≤0.001)进行验证。这些结果表示可接受的可靠性。反应性通过 Cohen's 效应大小(1.39)、标准化反应均值(1.03)和 QoR-15K 评分与麻醉持续时间之间的相关性(=−0.197,=0.016)进行验证。这些结果显示出可接受的反应性。完成 QoR-15K 的平均±标准偏差时间为 138.1±30.7 s。QoR-15K 在共识标准基础上的健康测量工具选择清单上被评为“足够好”。总之,QoR-15K 表现出可接受的有效性、可靠性、反应性和临床可行性,可能有助于评估韩国人群的术后恢复质量。

相似文献

1
Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.术后恢复质量评分 QoR-15 韩国版的翻译和验证。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 9;2020:3456234. doi: 10.1155/2020/3456234. eCollection 2020.
2
Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.验证和临床实用的韩文版的质量恢复- 15 与手术后恢复增强:前瞻性观察队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.《质量恢复-15 问卷韩国版的有效性和可靠性》。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr;74(2):142-149. doi: 10.4097/kja.20435. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire.《质量恢复状况 40 问卷》韩文版的有效性和可靠性。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Dec;71(6):467-475. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.27188. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.验证质量恢复评分 QoR-40 的日文版。
J Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2. Epub 2011 May 31.
6
Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.丹麦版术后恢复质量评分QoR-15的翻译与验证
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):912-20. doi: 10.1111/aas.12525. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.康复质量-35泰国语版的效度与信度:一项基于问卷的前瞻性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7.
8
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.康复质量-15评分中文版的验证及其与术后质量康复量表的比较
Patient. 2016 Jun;9(3):251-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0148-6.
9
Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.验证 Quality of Recovery-15 问卷在讲法语人群中的翻译版本。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.验证质量恢复-15 量表的荷兰语翻译。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01784-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Thai version of the quality of recovery scale (QoR-14-Thai) after elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.全身麻醉下择期腹部手术后泰国版恢复质量量表(QoR - 14 - Thai)的验证
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03044-8.
2
Effectiveness, usability, and patient satisfaction of an mHealth application with an integrated ePRO system following lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: A quasi-experimental study.腰椎退行性脊柱手术后,一款集成电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统的移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的有效性、可用性及患者满意度:一项准实验研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 20;11:20552076251324687. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324687. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Validation of the Japanese Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 Questionnaire and Its Association with Postpartum Depression and Functional Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study.日本版产后恢复质量-11问卷的验证及其与产后抑郁和功能结局的关联:一项前瞻性观察研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 19;14(4):1390. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041390.
4
Validity and reliability study of the quality of recovery scale in Turkish.土耳其语版康复质量量表的效度和信度研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 May 3;53(5):1144-1154. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5680. eCollection 2023.
5
Psychometric evaluation of a quality of recovery score for the postanesthesia care unit-A preliminary validation study.术后恢复质量评分的心理测量评估-初步验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0289685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289685. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of a Non-Opioid Multimodal Analgesia Protocol with Opioid-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Pain Control Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial.非阿片类多模式镇痛方案与基于阿片类药物的患者自控镇痛用于机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后疼痛控制的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验
J Pain Res. 2023 Feb 18;16:563-572. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S397529. eCollection 2023.
7
Factor structure of post-operative quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15): An Italian adaptation and validation.术后恢复质量问卷(QoR-15)的因子结构:意大利语改编与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;13:1096579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1096579. eCollection 2022.
8
Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15).广泛使用的恢复评分的语言验证:恢复质量 15 分(QoR-15)。
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;52(2):427-435. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5330. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
9
Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Enhances the Quality of Recovery after Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞促进胃肠手术后康复质量的改善:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Apr 30;2022:8994297. doi: 10.1155/2022/8994297. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of Increased Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter on Inadequate Emergence from Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.视神经鞘直径增加对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术患者麻醉苏醒不足的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;11(12):2260. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122260.

本文引用的文献

1
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
3
Quality of Recovery after Anesthesia: Validation of the Portuguese Version of the 'Quality of Recovery 15' Questionnaire.麻醉后恢复质量:《恢复质量15项》问卷葡萄牙语版本的验证
Acta Med Port. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):567-74. doi: 10.20344/amp.6129. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
Successful recovery after major surgery: moving beyond length of stay.术后成功康复:超越住院时间。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2014 Jul 8;3:4. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-3-4. eCollection 2014.
5
Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review.使用 QoR-40 测量康复质量:一项定量系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.术后恢复质量评分(QoR-15)的制定与心理计量学评估。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
7
Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.验证质量恢复评分 QoR-40 的日文版。
J Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2. Epub 2011 May 31.
8
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.COSMIN 研究就健康相关患者报告结局的测量属性的分类学、术语和定义达成了国际共识。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
9
Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments.关于特定康复生活质量量表的系统评价
Surgery. 2008 Feb;143(2):206-15. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.017. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
10
Depression and emotional reactivity: variation among Asian Americans of East Asian descent and European Americans.抑郁与情绪反应性:东亚裔美国人和欧裔美国人之间的差异
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Nov;116(4):776-85. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.776.