Suppr超能文献

术后恢复质量评分 QoR-15 韩国版的翻译和验证。

Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Armed Forces Daegu Hospital, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 9;2020:3456234. doi: 10.1155/2020/3456234. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Quality of recovery after anesthesia is an important measure of the early postoperative health status of patients. The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire is a self-rated questionnaire used to assess the quality of postoperative recovery. This study is aimed at translating and validating the Korean version of QoR-15 (QoR-15K). One hundred fifty patients were included in this study. We translated the original version of QoR-15 into QoR-15K and evaluated its validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical feasibility. QoR-15K showed acceptable criterion, structure, and construct validities. Reliability was verified using Cronbach's (0.856), standard error of measurement (10.78), split-half reliability (0.831), test-retest reliability ( = 0.945, ≤ 0.001), and intraclass correlation test-retest ( = 0.903, ≤ 0.001). These results represent an acceptable reliability. Responsiveness was verified using Cohen's effect size (1.39), standardized response mean (1.03), and the correlation between QoR-15K score and duration of anesthesia ( = -0.197, = 0.016). These results show acceptable responsiveness. The mean ± standard deviation time to complete QoR-15K was 138.1 ± 30.7 s. QoR-15K was rated more than adequate on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. In conclusion, QoR-15K shows acceptable validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical feasibility and may help evaluate postoperative quality of recovery in Korean populations.

摘要

麻醉后恢复质量是衡量患者术后早期健康状况的重要指标。QoR-15(质量恢复-15)问卷是一种自评问卷,用于评估术后恢复质量。本研究旨在将 QoR-15(QoR-15)的韩文版进行翻译和验证。本研究共纳入 150 例患者。我们将原始版本的 QoR-15 翻译成 QoR-15K,并评估其有效性、可靠性、反应性和临床可行性。QoR-15K 表现出可接受的标准、结构和构建效度。可靠性通过 Cronbach's (0.856)、测量标准误差(10.78)、半分割可靠性(0.831)、测试-重测可靠性(=0.945,≤0.001)和组内相关测试-重测(=0.903,≤0.001)进行验证。这些结果表示可接受的可靠性。反应性通过 Cohen's 效应大小(1.39)、标准化反应均值(1.03)和 QoR-15K 评分与麻醉持续时间之间的相关性(=−0.197,=0.016)进行验证。这些结果显示出可接受的反应性。完成 QoR-15K 的平均±标准偏差时间为 138.1±30.7 s。QoR-15K 在共识标准基础上的健康测量工具选择清单上被评为“足够好”。总之,QoR-15K 表现出可接受的有效性、可靠性、反应性和临床可行性,可能有助于评估韩国人群的术后恢复质量。

相似文献

1
Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 9;2020:3456234. doi: 10.1155/2020/3456234. eCollection 2020.
3
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr;74(2):142-149. doi: 10.4097/kja.20435. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Dec;71(6):467-475. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.27188. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.
J Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2. Epub 2011 May 31.
6
Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):912-20. doi: 10.1111/aas.12525. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7.
9
Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01784-5.

引用本文的文献

4
Validity and reliability study of the quality of recovery scale in Turkish.
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 May 3;53(5):1144-1154. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5680. eCollection 2023.
5
Psychometric evaluation of a quality of recovery score for the postanesthesia care unit-A preliminary validation study.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0289685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289685. eCollection 2023.
7
Factor structure of post-operative quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15): An Italian adaptation and validation.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;13:1096579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1096579. eCollection 2022.
8
Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15).
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;52(2):427-435. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5330. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
3
Quality of Recovery after Anesthesia: Validation of the Portuguese Version of the 'Quality of Recovery 15' Questionnaire.
Acta Med Port. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):567-74. doi: 10.20344/amp.6129. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
Successful recovery after major surgery: moving beyond length of stay.
Perioper Med (Lond). 2014 Jul 8;3:4. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-3-4. eCollection 2014.
5
Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review.
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.
Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
7
Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.
J Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2. Epub 2011 May 31.
9
Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments.
Surgery. 2008 Feb;143(2):206-15. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.017. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验