Han Lin, Xu Xi-Bo
Shandong Geological Engineering Investigation Institute, Ji'nan 250014, China.
College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan 250358, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Nov 8;41(11):5114-5124. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202004081.
The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the human health risks derived from different exposure paths of heavy metals in the soil. Zhangqiu county was selected as the study area, and 425 soil samples were collected to measure the As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn contents. A descriptive statistical method was used to assess the heavy metal pollution status of the soils, and the quantitative sources for human health were then determined based on positive matrix factorization (PMF) and geo-statistical techniques. The results show that the contents of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn in the soils exceed background values, but do not exceed the risk screening values, indicating that there is slight heavy metals pollution in the soil. The sources of heavy metals in the soil can be divided into three categories. The spatial distribution of Cr and Ni is approximately the same, is similar to the spatial distribution trend of parent materials, and belongs to natural sources. Cd, Cu, and Zn are controlled by transportation. The spatial distribution is significantly affected by the location of road lines. The hot spot areas of Hg, Pb, and As correspond to the locations of the industrial park and the urban area. Industrial emissions and coal combustion increase the accumulation of Hg in the soil, and As, Pb, and Hg are classified as industrial sources. The contribution rate of industrial source is 41.85%, with transportation sources and natural sources being 33.79% and 24.36%, respectively. The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks under the exposure paths of hand, breathing, and skin are within the acceptable level. For children, the sources of heavy metals with the largest carcinogenic (36.53%) and non-carcinogenic (36.01%) risks are industrial sources. However, transportation is the largest source of carcinogenic (34.98%) and non-carcinogenic (37.06%) risk for adults. Differential avoidance of heavy metal sources and exposure pathways is vital to reducing human health risks.
本研究旨在定量评估土壤中重金属不同暴露途径对人体健康产生的风险。选取章丘县作为研究区域,采集了425个土壤样本,以测定砷、镉、铬、铜、汞、镍、铅和锌的含量。采用描述性统计方法评估土壤中重金属污染状况,然后基于正定矩阵因子分解(PMF)和地统计技术确定对人体健康的定量来源。结果表明,土壤中砷、镉、铬、铜、汞、镍、铅和锌的含量超过背景值,但未超过风险筛选值,表明土壤存在轻微重金属污染。土壤中重金属来源可分为三类。铬和镍的空间分布大致相同,与母质的空间分布趋势相似,属于自然来源。镉、铜和锌受交通运输控制。其空间分布受道路线路位置的显著影响。汞、铅和砷的热点区域与工业园区和城区位置相对应。工业排放和煤炭燃烧增加了土壤中汞的积累,砷、铅和汞归类为工业来源。工业源贡献率为41.85%,交通运输源和自然源分别为33.79%和24.36%。手接触、呼吸和皮肤暴露途径下的非致癌和致癌风险均在可接受水平内。对于儿童,致癌风险(36.53%)和非致癌风险(36.01%)最大的重金属来源是工业源。然而,对于成年人,交通运输是致癌风险(34.98%)和非致癌风险(37.06%)最大的来源。差异化规避重金属来源和暴露途径对于降低人体健康风险至关重要。