• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BEST-MS:那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗复发型多发性硬化症的前瞻性头对头对照研究。

BEST-MS: A prospective head-to-head comparative study of natalizumab and fingolimod in active relapsing MS.

作者信息

Cohen Mikael, Mondot Lydiane, Bucciarelli Florence, Pignolet Béatrice, Laplaud David-Axel, Wiertlewski Sandrine, Brochet Bruno, Ruet Aurélie, Defer Gilles, Derache Nathalie, Vermersch Patrick, Zephir Hélène, Debouverie Marc, Mathey Guillaume, Berger Eric, Cappé Chrystelle, Labauge Pierre, Carra Clarisse, De Seze Jérôme, Bigaut Kevin, Brassat David, Lebrun-Frenay Christine

机构信息

Service de Neurologie, CRCSEP, Unité de Recherche Clinique Cote d'Azur (UR2CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pasteur 2, Nice, France.

Service de Radiologie, Unité de Recherche Clinique Cote d'Azur (UR2CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pasteur 2, Nice, France.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2021 Sep;27(10):1556-1563. doi: 10.1177/1352458520969145. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1177/1352458520969145
PMID:33124504
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are few head-to-head studies to compare highly active treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness between natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) in active relapsing-remitting MS.

METHOD

Best Escalation STrategy in Multiple Sclerosis (BEST-MS) is a multicentric, prospective study with a 12-month follow-up including patients with active MS. Treatment choice was at the discretion of physician. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected at baseline and at 12 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included annualized relapse rate and MRI activity.

RESULTS

A total of 223 patients were included (NTZ: 109 and FTY: 114). Treatment groups were well balanced at baseline. Proportion of NEDA patients was 47.8% in NTZ group versus 30.4% in FTY group ( = 0.015). This superiority was driven by annualized relapse rate and MRI activity. In the multivariate analysis, treatment group was the only factor associated with NEDA at 12 months with a lower probability in FTY group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.49,  = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

BEST-MS is a prospective study that compared head-to-head the effectiveness of NTZ and FTY in active relapsing-remitting MS. Our results suggest a superiority of NTZ over FTY.

摘要

背景

很少有直接比较治疗多发性硬化症(MS)的高效疗法的研究。

目的

本研究旨在比较那他珠单抗(NTZ)和芬戈莫德(FTY)在活动性复发缓解型MS中的疗效。

方法

多发性硬化症最佳升级策略(BEST-MS)是一项多中心前瞻性研究,对活动性MS患者进行为期12个月的随访。治疗方案由医生决定。在基线和12个月时收集临床和磁共振成像(MRI)数据。主要结局是12个月时达到无疾病活动证据(NEDA)的患者比例。次要结局包括年化复发率和MRI活动情况。

结果

共纳入223例患者(NTZ组109例,FTY组114例)。治疗组在基线时均衡良好。NTZ组NEDA患者比例为47.8%,FTY组为30.4%(P = 0.015)。这种优势由年化复发率和MRI活动情况驱动。在多变量分析中,治疗组是与12个月时NEDA相关的唯一因素,FTY组概率较低(比值比(OR)= 0.49,P = 0.029)。

结论

BEST-MS是一项前瞻性研究,直接比较了NTZ和FTY在活动性复发缓解型MS中的疗效。我们的结果表明NTZ优于FTY。

相似文献

1
BEST-MS: A prospective head-to-head comparative study of natalizumab and fingolimod in active relapsing MS.BEST-MS:那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗复发型多发性硬化症的前瞻性头对头对照研究。
Mult Scler. 2021 Sep;27(10):1556-1563. doi: 10.1177/1352458520969145. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Switching from natalizumab to fingolimod treatment in multiple sclerosis: real life data from the Austrian MS Treatment Registry.从那他珠单抗转换为多发性硬化症的芬戈莫德治疗:来自奥地利多发性硬化症治疗登记处的真实数据。
J Neurol. 2019 Nov;266(11):2672-2677. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09464-0. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients.在一项多发性硬化症患者的真实世界研究中,评估芬戈莫德有效性的相关因素及基础情况。
J Neurol. 2018 Apr;265(4):896-905. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8791-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Long-Term Efficacy Outcomes of Natalizumab vs. Fingolimod in Patients With Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Real-World Data From a Multiple Sclerosis Reference Center.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗高度活动性复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的长期疗效结果:来自一个多发性硬化症参考中心的真实世界数据
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 23;12:699844. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.699844. eCollection 2021.
5
Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Dec 9;6(2):252-262. doi: 10.1002/acn3.700. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.利妥昔单抗与那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Sep;7(9):1466-1476. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51111. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
Therapy of highly active pediatric multiple sclerosis.小儿活动性多发性硬化症的治疗。
Mult Scler. 2019 Jan;25(1):72-80. doi: 10.1177/1352458517732843. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
Natalizumab, rituximab and fingolimod as escalation therapy in multiple sclerosis.那他珠单抗、利妥昔单抗和芬戈莫德作为多发性硬化症的升级治疗。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Aug;26(8):1060-1067. doi: 10.1111/ene.13936. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Long-term outcome in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod.用芬戈莫德治疗的多发性硬化症患者的长期预后。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Oct;45:102416. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102416. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
10
Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study.西班牙二线治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症中芬戈莫德与那他珠单抗的疗效比较:二线 GATE 研究。
Eur Neurol. 2020;83(1):25-33. doi: 10.1159/000505778. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary progression activity monitoring in MS despite an early highly active treatment the SPAM study.尽管早期进行了高度积极的治疗,但在多发性硬化症中进行继发性进展活动监测:SPAM研究
Eur J Neurol. 2025 May;32(5):e16583. doi: 10.1111/ene.16583.
2
Pediatric-onset Multiple Sclerosis treatment: a multicentre observational study comparing natalizumab with fingolimod.儿童多发性硬化症的治疗:一项比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德的多中心观察性研究。
J Neurol. 2024 Oct;271(10):6773-6781. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12610-y. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Natalizumab, Fingolimod, and Injectable Therapies in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Registry-Based Study.
基于注册登记研究的比较:那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和注射用药物在儿童发病多发性硬化症中的疗效。
Neurology. 2024 Apr 9;102(7):e208114. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208114. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
4
Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis who are initiating disease-modifying therapy with natalizumab compared with BRACETD first-line therapies.与BRACETD一线疗法相比,开始使用那他珠单抗进行疾病修正治疗的多发性硬化症患者的长期临床结局。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Feb 26;17:17562864231221331. doi: 10.1177/17562864231221331. eCollection 2024.
5
Broader Epstein-Barr virus-specific T cell receptor repertoire in patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者中存在更广泛的 EBV 特异性 T 细胞受体库。
J Exp Med. 2022 Nov 7;219(11). doi: 10.1084/jem.20220650. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
6
Impact of methodological choices in comparative effectiveness studies: application in natalizumab versus fingolimod comparison among patients with multiple sclerosis.方法学选择对比较有效性研究的影响:在多发性硬化症患者中比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 30;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01623-8.