School of Business Administration, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241400. eCollection 2020.
In view of the difficulty, high cost and complex technology of pharmaceutical logistics green transformation, based on the idea of green supply chain, three different government subsidy strategies for green logistics were proposed. Firstly, by constructing a Stackelberg game model with pharmaceutical logistics provider as the leader and manufacturer as the followers, the behavior selection and optimal decisions of the participants under the anarchic subsidy strategy, the single subsidy strategy of the pharmaceutical logistics provider, the single subsidy strategy of the pharmaceutical manufacturer and the coordinated subsidy strategy are analyzed respectively. Furthermore, the effects of different subsidy strategies on the green investment and strategy selection of logistics provider and manufacturer are compared. Finally, according to the research results, the paper provides reference and suggestions for the formulation of government subsidy strategy. The results show that the three subsidy strategies have different degrees of incentive effect on the green transformation of pharmaceutical logistics, and the single logistics provider subsidy strategy is the best.
鉴于药品物流绿色转型的困难、高成本和复杂技术,基于绿色供应链理念,提出了三种不同的政府物流绿色补贴策略。首先,通过构建以药品物流提供商为领导者、制造商为追随者的斯塔克伯格博弈模型,分析了在无政府补贴策略、药品物流提供商单一补贴策略、药品制造商单一补贴策略和协调补贴策略下参与者的行为选择和最优决策。此外,比较了不同补贴策略对物流提供商和制造商绿色投资和策略选择的影响。最后,根据研究结果,为政府补贴策略的制定提供了参考和建议。结果表明,三种补贴策略对药品物流的绿色转型都有不同程度的激励作用,其中单一物流提供商补贴策略效果最佳。