NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Arapahoe County Coroner's Office, Centennial, Colorado.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2023262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23262.
The true incidence of sudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC), already the fifth leading category of death among toddlers by current US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates, is potentially veiled by the varied certification processes by medicolegal investigative offices across the United States.
To evaluate the frequency of SUDC incidence, understand its epidemiology, and assess the consistency of death certification among medical examiner and coroner offices in the US death investigation system.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case series, 2 of 13 forensic pathologists (FPs) conducted masked reviews of 100 cases enrolled in the SUDC Registry and Research Collaborative (SUDCRRC). Children who died aged 11 months to 18 years from 36 US states, Canada, and the United Kingdom had been posthumously enrolled in the SUDCRRC by family members from 2014 to 2017. Comprehensive data from medicolegal investigative offices, clinical offices, and family members were reviewed. Data analysis was conducted from December 2014 to June 2020.
Certified cause of death (COD) characterized as explained (accidental or natural) or unexplained, as determined by SUDCRRC masked review process.
In this study of 100 cases of SUDC (mean [SD] age, 32.1 [31.8] months; 58 [58.0%] boys; 82 [82.0%] White children; 92 [92.0%] from the United States), the original pathologist certified 43 cases (43.0%) as explained COD and 57 (57.0%) as unexplained COD. The SUDCRRC review process led to the following certifications: 16 (16.0%) were explained, 7 (7.0%) were undetermined because of insufficient data, and 77 (77.0%) were unexplained. Experts disagreed with the original COD in 40 cases (40.0%). These data suggest that SUDC incidence is higher than the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate (ie, 392 deaths in 2018).
To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive masked forensic pathology review process of sudden unexpected pediatric deaths, and it suggests that SUDC may often go unrecognized in US death investigations. Some unexpected pediatric deaths may be erroneously attributed to a natural or accidental COD, negatively affecting surveillance, research, public health funding, and medical care of surviving family members. To further address the challenges of accurate and consistent death certification in SUDC, future studies are warranted.
在美国疾病控制与预防中心目前的估计中,儿童突发性不明原因死亡(SUDC)已经是导致幼儿死亡的第五大主要原因,而美国法医学调查办公室各不相同的认证程序可能掩盖了其真实发病率。
评估 SUDC 发病率,了解其流行病学,并评估美国死亡调查系统中法医和验尸官办公室之间死亡证明的一致性。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项病例系列研究中,13 名法医病理学家中的 2 名对参加 SUDC 登记和研究协作(SUDCRRC)的 100 例病例进行了盲法审查。从 2014 年至 2017 年,36 个美国州、加拿大和英国的 11 个月至 18 岁儿童的家庭成员将其死后登记在 SUDCRRC 中。对法医调查办公室、临床办公室和家庭成员的综合数据进行了审查。数据分析于 2014 年 12 月至 2020 年 6 月进行。
根据 SUDCRRC 盲法审查过程确定的由法医病理学家认证的死因(COD)为解释性(意外或自然)或不明原因。
在这项 100 例 SUDC 病例的研究中(平均[标准差]年龄,32.1[31.8]个月;58[58.0%]男孩;82[82.0%]白人儿童;92[92.0%]来自美国),最初的病理学家认证 43 例(43.0%)为解释性 COD,57 例(57.0%)为不明原因 COD。SUDCRRC 审查过程导致以下认证:16 例(16.0%)为解释性,7 例(7.0%)因数据不足而无法确定,77 例(77.0%)为不明原因。专家在 40 例(40.0%)案例中不同意最初的 COD。这些数据表明,SUDC 的发病率高于目前美国疾病控制与预防中心的估计(即 2018 年 392 例死亡)。
据我们所知,这是首次对儿童突发性意外死亡进行全面的法医病理学盲法审查,这表明 SUDC 在美国的死亡调查中可能经常未被发现。一些意外的儿科死亡可能被错误地归因于自然或意外的 COD,这对监测、研究、公共卫生资金和幸存家庭成员的医疗护理产生负面影响。为了进一步解决 SUDC 中准确和一致的死亡证明的挑战,未来的研究是必要的。