• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

60岁以下人群II型齿状突骨折的短期后路C1-C2椎弓根螺钉固定不融合治疗

Short-term posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation without fusion to treat type II odontoid fracture among people under 60 years.

作者信息

Song Jipeng, Yi Ping, Wang Yanlei, Gong Long, Sun Yan, Yang Feng, Tang Xiangsheng, Tan Mingsheng

机构信息

Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.

Orthopedics Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Apr;142(4):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03641-x. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-020-03641-x
PMID:33125545
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation is a reliable technique used in treatment of type II odontoid fracture. However, the loss of cervical range of rotation motion (RORM) was inevitable. There were few studies focusing on the influence of short-term C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique to preserve cervical function in patients younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to compare cervical RORM which was measured by an improved goniometer, and the clinical outcomes between short-term and long-term C1-C2 fixation techniques in the treatment of Grauer type 2B and 2C odontoid fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study represents a retrospective analysis, including patients who underwent primary C1-C2 fixation surgery. These patients were divided into short-term and long-term groups based on whether underwent a fixation removal operation. The clinical results were collected and compared between the two groups. Independent T test and Chi-square analyses were used to identify significant differences between the two groups and dependent T test was used within each group. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

RESULTS

There were no severe postoperative complications, and all 60 patients achieved spinal stabilization after primary surgery. The mean rotation angle in the short-term group at last follow-up time was 138.39 ± 21.06°, which was better than 83.59 ± 13.06° in the long-term group (p < .05). The same statistical difference was observed in flexion-extension angle, which was 71.11 ± 18.73° in short-term group and 53.34 ± 18.23° in long-term group. The mean NDI score in short-term group at last follow-up time was 1.23 ± 0.86 and better than 8.24 ± 3.17 in long-term group. However, the VAS score in short-term group was 1.82 ± 0.54 which was worse compared to 0.64 ± 0.29 in long-term group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that primary C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique could support satisfactory clinical effects. In addition, the removal of instruments after bony fusion could improve the function of cervical movement significantly in patients under 60 years.

摘要

引言

C1-C2 后路椎弓根螺钉固定术是治疗 II 型齿状突骨折的可靠技术。然而,颈椎旋转活动度(RORM)的丧失不可避免。很少有研究关注非融合技术短期 C1-C2 固定对 60 岁以下患者保留颈椎功能的影响。本研究的目的是比较采用改良角度计测量的颈椎 RORM,以及短期和长期 C1-C2 固定技术治疗 Grauer 2B 型和 2C 型齿状突骨折的临床疗效。

材料与方法

本研究为回顾性分析,纳入接受初次 C1-C2 固定手术的患者。根据是否接受内固定取出手术,将这些患者分为短期组和长期组。收集两组的临床结果并进行比较。采用独立样本 t 检验和卡方分析确定两组间的显著差异,每组内采用配对 t 检验。设定统计学显著性水平为 p < 0.05。

结果

术后无严重并发症,60 例患者初次手术后均实现脊柱稳定。短期组末次随访时的平均旋转角度为 138.39°±21.06°,优于长期组的 83.59°±13.06°(p < 0.05)。屈伸角度也观察到相同的统计学差异,短期组为 71.11°±18.73°,长期组为 53.34°±18.23°。短期组末次随访时的平均 NDI 评分为 1.23±0.86,优于长期组的 8.24±3.17。然而,短期组的 VAS 评分为 1.82±0.54,比长期组的 0.64±0.29 更差。

结论

结果表明,采用非融合技术的初次 C1-C2 固定可获得满意的临床效果。此外,60 岁以下患者在骨融合后取出内固定可显著改善颈椎活动功能。

相似文献

1
Short-term posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation without fusion to treat type II odontoid fracture among people under 60 years.60岁以下人群II型齿状突骨折的短期后路C1-C2椎弓根螺钉固定不融合治疗
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Apr;142(4):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03641-x. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Posterior atlantoaxial fixation of osteoporotic odontoid fracture: biomechanical analysis of the Magerl versus harms techniques in a cadaver model.骨质疏松性齿状突骨折的寰枢后路固定:Magerl 与 Harms 技术在尸体模型中的生物力学分析。
Spine J. 2024 Aug;24(8):1510-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
3
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Posterior C1-C2 Temporary Fixation Without Fusion and C1-C2 Fusion for Fresh Odontoid Fractures.新鲜齿状突骨折行C1-C2后路临时固定不融合与C1-C2融合的临床疗效比较
Neurosurgery. 2016 Jan;78(1):77-83. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001006.
4
Predisposing Factors of Fracture Nonunion After Posterior C1 Lateral Mass Screws Combined with C2 Pedicle/Laminar Screw Fixation for Type II Odontoid Fracture.后路C1侧块螺钉联合C2椎弓根/椎板螺钉固定治疗Ⅱ型齿状突骨折后骨折不愈合的相关因素
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e417-e425. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.198. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
5
The comparison of clinical outcome of fresh type II odontoid fracture treatment between anterior cannulated screws fixation and posterior instrumentation of C1-2 without fusion: a retrospective cohort study.新鲜Ⅱ型齿状突骨折治疗中空心加压螺钉前路固定与C1-2后路内固定不融合的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jan 8;13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0702-0.
6
C1-c2 pedicle screw fixation for treatment of old odontoid fractures.C1-C2椎弓根螺钉固定术治疗陈旧性齿状突骨折
Orthopedics. 2015 Feb;38(2):94-100. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150204-52.
7
Posterior reduction and temporary fixation for odontoid fracture: a salvage maneuver to anterior screw fixation.齿状突骨折的后路复位与临时固定:一种挽救前路螺钉固定的策略
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):E168-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000709.
8
Posterior Fixation with C1 Lateral Mass Screws and C2 Pars Screws for Type II Odontoid Fracture in the Elderly: Long-Term Follow-Up.老年II型齿状突骨折采用C1侧块螺钉和C2椎弓根螺钉后路固定:长期随访
World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.100. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
9
Comparison of Atlantoaxial Rotation and Functional Outcomes of Two Nonfusion Techniques in the Treatment of Anderson-D'Alonzo Type II Odontoid Fractures.两种非融合技术治疗Anderson-D’Alonzo II型齿状突骨折的寰枢椎旋转及功能结果比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jun;41(12):E751-E758. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001370.
10
[The Anterior "Triple-/Quadruple" Technique for C1/C2 Trauma in the Elderly: First Experience with 16 Patients].[老年人C1/C2创伤的前路“三重/四重”技术:16例患者的首次经验]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Oct;153(5):533-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546133. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Type II Odontoid Fracture: A Case Report on Intraoperative Complication and Management.II型齿状突骨折:一例术中并发症及处理的病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Oct 5;16(10):e70902. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70902. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Rotation Preserving Fixation for the Treatment of C1 Burst Fracture Combined With Type II Odontoid Fracture: 2 Case Reports and Literature Review.旋转保留固定治疗C1爆裂骨折合并II型齿状突骨折:2例报告及文献复习
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):617-625. doi: 10.14444/8646.
3
Deep learning-based tool affects reproducibility of pes planus radiographic assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
C1-C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation for Pediatric Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Initial Results and Long-term Follow-up.儿童寰枢椎脱位的C1-C2椎弓根螺钉固定:初步结果及长期随访
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Feb;40(2):65-70. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001111.
2
Posterior temporary C1-2 fixation for 3-part fractures of the axis (odontoid dens and Hangman fractures).后路临时C1-2固定治疗枢椎三部分骨折(齿突骨折和绞刑者骨折)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e12957. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012957.
3
Trends in the surgical management of odontoid fractures in patients above 75 years of age: Retrospective study of 70 cases.
基于深度学习的工具影响扁平足放射评估的可重复性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 28;12(1):12891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16995-6.
4
Outcomes of ultra-old vs old patients after hip fracture surgery: a matched cohort analysis of 1524 patients.超高龄与高龄患者髋关节骨折手术后的结局:1524 例患者匹配队列分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3145-3154. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04550-x. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
75岁以上患者齿状突骨折的外科治疗趋势:70例回顾性研究
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Dec;103(8):1221-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
4
Is It Feasible to Treat Odontoid Fractures via Primary Posterior Reduction and Fixation without Fusion?经初次后路复位及固定而非融合治疗齿状突骨折是否可行?
World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:693-698. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.115. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
Osteoporosis Is the Most Important Risk Factor for Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly.骨质疏松症是老年人齿状突骨折最重要的危险因素。
J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Jul;32(7):1582-1588. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3120. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
Placement of C1 Pedicle Screws Using Minimal Exposure: Radiographic, Clinical, and Literature Validation.采用最小暴露置入C1椎弓根螺钉:影像学、临床及文献验证
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Aug 12;9:43. doi: 10.14444/2043. eCollection 2015.
7
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Posterior C1-C2 Temporary Fixation Without Fusion and C1-C2 Fusion for Fresh Odontoid Fractures.新鲜齿状突骨折行C1-C2后路临时固定不融合与C1-C2融合的临床疗效比较
Neurosurgery. 2016 Jan;78(1):77-83. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001006.
8
Posterior reduction and temporary fixation for odontoid fracture: a salvage maneuver to anterior screw fixation.齿状突骨折的后路复位与临时固定:一种挽救前路螺钉固定的策略
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):E168-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000709.
9
Biomechanical comparison of the pullout strengths of C1 lateral mass screws and C1 posterior arch screws.颈椎侧块螺钉与颈椎后弓螺钉的拔出强度的生物力学比较。
Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1892-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
10
C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis.经后弓行 C1 侧块螺钉置钉:技术比较与解剖分析。
Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Aug 14.