Menger Richard P, Storey Christopher M, Nixon Menarvia K C, Haydel Justin, Nanda Anil, Sin Anthony
Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University of Health Sciences, Shreveport LA.
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Aug 12;9:43. doi: 10.14444/2043. eCollection 2015.
Traditional C1-2 fixation involves placement of C1 lateral mass screws. Evolving techniques have led to the placement of C1 pedicle screws to avoid exposure of the C1-C2 joint capsule. Our minimal dissection technique utilizes anatomical landmarks with isolated exposure of C2 and the inferior posterior arch of C1. We evaluate this procedure clinically and radiographically through a technical report.
Consecutive cases of cranial-vertebral junction surgery were reviewed for one fellowship trained spinal surgeon from 2008-2014. Information regarding sex, age, indication for surgery, private or public hospital, intra-operative complications, post-operative neurological deterioration, death, and failure of fusion was extracted. Measurement of pre-operative axial and sagittal CT scans were performed for C1 pedicle width and C1 posterior arch height respectively.
64 patients underwent posterior cranio-vertebral junction fixation surgery. 40 of these patients underwent occipital-cervical fusion procedures. 7/9 (77.8%) C1 instrumentation cases were from trauma with the remaining two (22.2%) from oncologic lesions. The average blood loss among isolated C1-C2 fixation was 160cc. 1/9 patients (11.1%) suffered pedicle breech requiring sub-laminar wiring at the C1 level. On radiographic measurement, the average height of the C1 posterior arch was noted at 4.3mm (range 3.8mm to 5.7mm). The average width of the C1 pedicle measured at 5.3mm (range 2.8 to 8.7mm). The patient with C1 pedicle screw failure had a pedicle width of 2.78mm on pre-operative axial CT imaging.
Our study directly adds to the literature with level four evidence supporting a minimal dissection of C1 arch in the placement of C1 pedicle screws with both radiographic and clinical validation.
Justification of this technique avoids C2 nerve root manipulation or sacrifice, reduces bleeding associated with the venous plexus, and leaves the third segment of the vertebral artery unexplored. Pre-operative review of imaging is critical in the placement of C1-C2 instrumentation.
传统的C1-2固定术涉及C1侧块螺钉的置入。技术的不断发展促使C1椎弓根螺钉的置入,以避免暴露C1-C2关节囊。我们的微创解剖技术利用解剖标志,仅暴露C2和C1下后弓。我们通过一份技术报告对该手术进行临床和影像学评估。
回顾了2008年至2014年一位接受过脊柱外科 fellowship培训的脊柱外科医生连续进行的颅颈交界区手术病例。提取了有关性别、年龄、手术指征、私立或公立医院、术中并发症、术后神经功能恶化、死亡和融合失败的信息。分别对术前轴向和矢状位CT扫描进行测量,以获取C1椎弓根宽度和C1后弓高度。
64例患者接受了后颅颈交界区固定手术。其中40例患者接受了枕颈融合手术。9例C1内固定病例中有7例(77.8%)因创伤,其余2例(22.2%)因肿瘤病变。单纯C1-C2固定的平均失血量为160cc。9例患者中有1例(11.1%)出现椎弓根穿破,需要在C1水平进行椎板下钢丝固定。影像学测量显示,C1后弓平均高度为4.3mm(范围为3.8mm至5.7mm)。C1椎弓根平均宽度为5.3mm(范围为2.8至8.7mm)。C1椎弓根螺钉失败的患者术前轴向CT成像显示椎弓根宽度为2.78mm。
我们的研究直接为文献增添了四级证据,支持在置入C1椎弓根螺钉时对C1弓进行微创解剖,并得到了影像学和临床验证。
该技术的合理性在于避免了对C2神经根的操作或牺牲,减少了与静脉丛相关的出血,且未探查椎动脉第三段。术前影像学评估对于C1-C2内固定的置入至关重要。