Suppr超能文献

应用体视显微镜弹性成像技术鉴别胰腺癌与自身免疫性胰腺炎。

Distinguishing pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis with in vivo tomoelastography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):3366-3374. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07420-5. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively investigate the stiffness and fluidity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) with tomoelastography, and to evaluate its diagnostic performance in distinguishing the two entities.

METHODS

Tomoelastography provided high-resolution maps of shear wave speed (c in m/s) and phase angle (φ in rad), allowing mechanical characterization of the stiffness and fluidity properties of the pancreas. Forty patients with untreated PDAC and 33 patients with untreated AIP who underwent diagnostic pancreatic MRI at 3-T together with multifrequency MR elastography and tomoelastography data processing were prospectively enrolled. Ten healthy volunteers served as controls. Two radiologists and a technician measured pancreatic stiffness and fluidity independently. The two radiologists also independently evaluated the patients' conventional MR sequences using the following diagnostic score: 1, definitely PDAC; 2, probably PDAC; 3, indeterminate; 4, probably AIP; and 5, definitely AIP. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Stiffness and fluidity of PDAC, AIP, and healthy pancreas, as well as diagnostic performance of tomoelastography and conventional MRI, were compared.

RESULTS

AIP showed significantly lower stiffness and fluidity than PDAC and significantly higher stiffness and fluidity than healthy pancreas. Pancreatic fluidity was not influenced by secondary obstructive changes. The intraclass correlation coefficient for pancreatic stiffness and fluidity by the 3 readers was near-perfect (0.951-0.979, all p < 0.001). Both stiffness and fluidity allowed distinguishing PDAC from AIP. AUCs were 0.906 for stiffness, 0.872 for fluidity, and 0.842 for conventional MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic stiffness and fluidity both allow differentiation of PDAC and AIP with high accuracy.

KEY POINTS

• AIP showed significantly lower stiffness and fluidity than PDAC and significantly higher stiffness and fluidity than healthy pancreas. • Both stiffness and fluidity allowed distinguishing PDAC from AIP. • Pancreatic fluidity could distinguish malignancy from non-malignant secondary obstructive changes.

摘要

目的

前瞻性研究胰导管腺癌(PDAC)和自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)的硬度和流动性,并评估其在鉴别这两种实体方面的诊断性能。

方法

声触诊组织量化技术(tomoelastography)提供了剪切波速度(c 以 m/s 为单位)和相位角(φ 以 rad 为单位)的高分辨率图谱,允许对胰腺的硬度和流动性特性进行机械表征。前瞻性纳入了 40 名未经治疗的 PDAC 患者和 33 名未经治疗的 AIP 患者,他们在 3-T 进行了诊断性胰腺 MRI 检查,同时进行了多频磁共振弹性成像和声触诊组织量化技术数据处理。10 名健康志愿者作为对照。两名放射科医生和一名技术员独立测量了胰腺的硬度和流动性。两名放射科医生还使用以下诊断评分独立评估了患者的常规 MR 序列:1,肯定 PDAC;2,可能 PDAC;3,不确定;4,可能 AIP;5,肯定 AIP。评估了观察者间的一致性。比较了 PDAC、AIP 和健康胰腺的硬度和流动性,以及声触诊组织量化技术和常规 MRI 的诊断性能。

结果

AIP 的硬度和流动性明显低于 PDAC,明显高于健康胰腺。胰腺的流动性不受继发阻塞性变化的影响。3 名读者的胰腺硬度和流动性的组内相关系数接近完美(0.951-0.979,均 p<0.001)。硬度和流动性均能区分 PDAC 和 AIP。硬度的 AUC 为 0.906,流动性的 AUC 为 0.872,常规 MRI 的 AUC 为 0.842。

结论

胰腺的硬度和流动性均能准确地区分 PDAC 和 AIP。

要点

• AIP 的硬度和流动性明显低于 PDAC,明显高于健康胰腺。• 硬度和流动性均能区分 PDAC 和 AIP。• 胰腺的流动性可以区分恶性肿瘤和非恶性继发性阻塞性改变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验