Barnicot K, Michael C, Trione E, Lang S, Saunders T, Sharp M, Crawford M J
Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom; School of Health Sciences, City University of London, Myddleton Street Building, 1Myddleton Street, London EC1R 1UW, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States of America.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101929. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101929. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
Acute inpatient psychiatric wards are important yet challenging environments in which to implement psychological interventions for people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. No meta-analysis to date has evaluated whether psychological interventions are effective in this context.
We systematically searched Embase, Medline and PsycInfo databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions implemented in acute inpatient psychiatric settings with individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. We conducted random effects meta-analyses of between-groups outcomes at post-intervention and relapse/re-hospitalisation rates by follow-up.
Twenty-nine trials were suitable for meta-analysis. Psychological interventions improved post-intervention positive symptoms, social functioning and treatment compliance and reduced the risk of relapse/ re-hospitalisation, relative to control conditions. Analyses of specific intervention effects found positive effects of psychoeducation on several key outcomes (power > 80%) and preliminary evidence for positive effects of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and metacognitive training (MCT) on some outcomes (power < 80%).
Psychological interventions can be helpful for acute inpatients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. However, risk of bias was often high or unclear, and some analyses were underpowered. Further research should use more rigorous RCT designs and publish meta-analysable data on positive symptoms, general psychopathology, relapse/ re-hospitalisation, social functioning and treatment compliance.
急性住院精神科病房是对精神分裂症谱系障碍患者实施心理干预的重要但具有挑战性的环境。迄今为止,尚无荟萃分析评估心理干预在此背景下是否有效。
我们系统检索了Embase、Medline和PsycInfo数据库,以查找在急性住院精神科环境中对精神分裂症谱系障碍患者实施心理干预的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们对干预后组间结局以及随访时的复发/再住院率进行了随机效应荟萃分析。
29项试验适合进行荟萃分析。与对照条件相比,心理干预改善了干预后的阳性症状、社会功能和治疗依从性,并降低了复发/再住院的风险。对特定干预效果的分析发现,心理教育对几个关键结局有积极影响(检验效能>80%),接受与承诺疗法(ACT)、认知行为疗法(CBT)和元认知训练(MCT)对某些结局有积极影响的初步证据(检验效能<80%)。
心理干预对患有精神分裂症谱系障碍的急性住院患者可能有帮助。然而,偏倚风险通常较高或不明确,且一些分析的检验效能不足。进一步的研究应采用更严格的随机对照试验设计,并公布关于阳性症状、一般精神病理学、复发/再住院、社会功能和治疗依从性的可进行荟萃分析的数据。