Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jul;69(1):90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
Adolescence encompasses a critical developmental phase, which fosters or hinders psychological, physical, and social health. Whole-school interventions take a universal approach in targeting the entire school environment ("school climate") to improve adolescent outcomes; however, little is known about the mediating role of school climate on these effects.
Our study (N = 5,539) was situated within the Strengthening Evidence base on scHool-based intErventions for pRomoting randomized controlled trial, which demonstrated the effectiveness of a lay counselor-delivered school intervention among secondary school students in Bihar, India. We examined the potential mediating role of school climate and its subcomponents (relationships at school, sense of belonging, commitment to academic achievement, and participation in school events) at 8 months postrandomization of the Strengthening Evidence base on scHool-based intErventions for pRomoting intervention on longer term adolescent health outcomes (depressive symptoms, experiences of bullying, and perpetration of violence) at 17 months postrandomization. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02484014).
School climate mediated the effects of the intervention on all three outcomes of interest. A nurturing school environment, characterized by supportive and engaged relationships with teachers and peers, a sense of belonging, and active participation in school climate predicted lower rates of depressive symptoms, experiences of bullying, and perpetration of violence. Noteworthy, it was the quality of these relationships, rather than the commitment to learning, which was most predictive of outcomes.
Educational policies should consider bolstering the school's social environment to directly impact adolescent health and well-being.
青春期是一个关键的发展阶段,它促进或阻碍了心理、身体和社会健康。全学校干预采用普遍性方法针对整个学校环境(“学校氛围”),以改善青少年的结果;然而,对于学校氛围对这些效果的中介作用知之甚少。
我们的研究(N=5539)位于加强基于学校的干预措施以促进证据基础的随机对照试验中,该试验证明了在印度比哈尔邦的中学生中,由非专业辅导员提供的学校干预措施的有效性。我们在强化证据基础以促进干预措施随机分组 8 个月后,检验了学校氛围及其子成分(学校关系、归属感、对学业成就的承诺和参与学校活动)在 17 个月后对长期青少年健康结果(抑郁症状、欺凌经历和暴力行为)的潜在中介作用。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(NCT02484014)。
学校氛围调节了干预对所有三个感兴趣结果的影响。培养性的学校环境,具有与教师和同伴的支持和参与关系、归属感和积极参与学校氛围,预测抑郁症状、欺凌经历和暴力行为的发生率较低。值得注意的是,这些关系的质量而不是对学习的承诺,是最能预测结果的因素。
教育政策应考虑加强学校的社会环境,以直接影响青少年的健康和幸福。