Sebastian Rachel A, Shattuck Daniel, Ramos Mary M, Willging Cathleen E
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation.
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 12:rs.3.rs-6735563. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6735563/v1.
LGBTQ + youth are at elevated risk for numerous negative health and behavioral health outcomes, which largely stem from minority stress and maladaptive coping. Schools are an important environment where these youth may be exposed to both stressors, like experiences of stigma, bias, discrimination, and violence, and health promotive factors that moderate the impact of minority stress. Collaboration between schools and the broader community plays a crucial role in initiatives designed to improve school climate and culture. In the context of a cluster randomized controlled trial implementing a suite of six LGBTQ + supportive practices in high schools, we used the "Collaborating with Community Scale" adapted specifically to address linkages between schools and communities focused on the needs of LGBTQ + students (CCS-LGTBQ+).
We conducted annual surveys over five years with an administrator and an implementation leader in each of the 42 high schools randomly assigned to either an implementation condition or a delayed implementation condition. The survey included questions on organizational leadership, implementation climate, and the CCS-LGBTQ+. We analyzed inter-rater reliability between respondent types, internal consistency, and change over time in scale items and means.
Scale scores between administrators and implementation leaders were strongly correlated. However, administrators rated items higher than implementation leaders, as was expected given their relative positions within school communities. The scale demonstrated a high level of internal consistency, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from .777 to .930 and was sensitive to changes in the implementation of scale items, indicated by increases in the scale means of implementation condition schools from 1.59 in year 1 to 2.08 in year 4 (p < .035).
Testing of the CCS-LGBTQ + resulted in a scale with high internal consistency to measure the extent to which schools collaborate with community resources to support and enhance school environments for LGBTQ + students. When used in the context of the parent trial, findings from the CCS-LGBTQ + show that schools' collaboration with their communities increased over time. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic likely reversed some of the gains made within the first years of implementation. The CCS-LGBTQ + is a reliable and useful tool for assessing school-community collaboration for supporting LGBTQ + populations.
LGBTQ+青年面临众多负面健康和行为健康后果的风险较高,这在很大程度上源于少数群体压力和适应不良的应对方式。学校是一个重要的环境,在这个环境中,这些青年可能会接触到各种压力源,如耻辱感、偏见、歧视和暴力经历,以及能够减轻少数群体压力影响的健康促进因素。学校与更广泛社区之间的合作在旨在改善学校氛围和文化的举措中起着至关重要的作用。在一项在高中实施一套六项支持LGBTQ+的实践的整群随机对照试验的背景下,我们使用了专门改编的“与社区合作量表”(CCS-LGTBQ+)来解决专注于LGBTQ+学生需求的学校与社区之间的联系。
我们在五年内对随机分配到实施条件组或延迟实施条件组的42所高中的每所学校的一名管理人员和一名实施负责人进行了年度调查。该调查包括关于组织领导、实施氛围和CCS-LGBTQ+的问题。我们分析了不同应答者类型之间的评分者间信度、内部一致性以及量表项目和均值随时间的变化。
管理人员和实施负责人之间的量表得分高度相关。然而,鉴于他们在学校社区中的相对地位,管理人员对项目的评分高于实施负责人。该量表显示出高度的内部一致性,克朗巴哈系数在0.777至0.930之间,并且对量表项目实施中的变化敏感,实施条件组学校的量表均值从第1年的1.59增加到第4年的2.08(p < 0.035)表明了这一点。
对CCS-LGBTQ+的测试产生了一个具有高内部一致性的量表,用于衡量学校与社区资源合作以支持和改善LGBTQ+学生学校环境的程度。在母试验的背景下使用时,CCS-LGBTQ+的结果表明学校与社区的合作随着时间的推移而增加。然而,COVID-19大流行的影响可能逆转了实施头几年取得的一些进展。CCS-LGBTQ+是评估学校-社区合作以支持LGBTQ+人群的可靠且有用的工具。