Kann L K
Division of Health Education, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
J Sch Health. 1987 Sep;57(7):282-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1987.tb03203.x.
This study examined effects of computer-assisted instruction on decision-making, assertiveness, and interpersonal communication related to responsible sexuality. Health science classes from four secondary schools in three midwestern states participated in the quasi-experimental study. The Experimental Group (n = 151) received simulation-based CAI, while Control Group #1 (n = 147) received regular classroom instruction, and Control Group #2 (n = 93) received no intervention. A 46-item questionnaire was administered to determine changes in the dependent variables. Findings indicated CAI, but not RCI, effectively improved decision-making knowledge and behavior, assertiveness knowledge and behavior, and interpersonal communication knowledge, attitude, and behavior. However, CAI did not improve assertiveness attitude. Over a five-week period, the effectiveness of CAI decayed for the knowledge variables. The effectiveness of CAI varied according to subject's gender, grade, and school-community setting. Results suggest simulation-based CAI provides an instructional approach that promotes positive change in some interaction skills related to responsible sexuality without many of the risks inherent in regular classroom instruction involving such sensitive topics.
本研究考察了计算机辅助教学对与负责任的性行为相关的决策、自信及人际沟通的影响。来自中西部三个州四所中学的健康科学课程参与了这项准实验研究。实验组(n = 151)接受基于模拟的计算机辅助教学,而对照组1(n = 147)接受常规课堂教学,对照组2(n = 93)未接受干预。采用一份包含46个条目的问卷来确定因变量的变化。研究结果表明,计算机辅助教学而非常规课堂教学有效地提高了决策知识与行为、自信知识与行为以及人际沟通知识、态度和行为。然而,计算机辅助教学并未改善自信态度。在为期五周的时间里,计算机辅助教学对知识变量的有效性逐渐衰减。计算机辅助教学的有效性因受试者的性别、年级和学校社区环境而异。结果表明,基于模拟的计算机辅助教学提供了一种教学方法,可促进与负责任的性行为相关的某些互动技能的积极变化,且没有涉及此类敏感话题的常规课堂教学所固有的许多风险。