• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智力残疾适应性功能量表(EFA-DI)的有效性和可靠性证据。

Evidence of validity and reliability of the adaptive functioning scale for intellectual disability (EFA-DI).

作者信息

Selau Thais, da Silva Mônia Aparecida, de Mendonça Filho Euclides José, Bandeira Denise Ruschel

机构信息

Graduate Program in Psychology. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2600 sala 120, Bairro Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035-003, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Psychology. Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Oct 31;33(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00164-7.

DOI:10.1186/s41155-020-00164-7
PMID:33128704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7603437/
Abstract

Intellectual disability (ID) is a developmental disorder characterized by deficits in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior. The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) defines adaptive functioning as a severity measure of ID. The availability of tests in the international context to assess this construct has increased in recent years. In Brazil, however, non-systematic assessment of adaptive functioning, such as through observation and interviews, still predominates. The Escala de Funcionamento Adaptativo para Deficiência Intelectual EFA-DI [Adaptive Functioning Scale for Intellectual Disabilities] is a new instrument developed in Brazil to assess the adaptive functioning of 7- to 15-year-old children and support the diagnosis of ID. This study's objectives were to investigate evidence of validity related to the EFA-DI's internal structure, criterion validity, and reliability. The psychometric analyses involved two statistical modeling types, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory analysis (IRT). These results highlight the EFA-DI scale's strong psychometric properties and support its use as a parental report measure of young children's adaptive functioning. Future studies will be conducted to develop norms of interpretation for the EFA-DI. This study is expected to contribute to the fields of psychological assessment and child development in Brazil.

摘要

智力残疾(ID)是一种发育障碍,其特征是智力功能和适应性行为存在缺陷。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)将适应性功能定义为智力残疾的严重程度衡量标准。近年来,国际上用于评估这一概念的测试有所增加。然而,在巴西,对适应性功能的非系统性评估,如通过观察和访谈进行的评估,仍然占主导地位。《智力残疾适应性功能量表》(Escala de Funcionamento Adaptativo para Deficiência Intelectual EFA-DI)是巴西开发的一种新工具,用于评估7至15岁儿童的适应性功能,并辅助智力残疾的诊断。本研究的目的是调查与EFA-DI的内部结构、效标效度和信度相关的效度证据。心理测量分析涉及两种统计建模类型,即验证性因素分析(CFA)和项目反应理论分析(IRT)。这些结果突出了EFA-DI量表强大的心理测量特性,并支持将其用作幼儿适应性功能的家长报告测量工具。未来将开展研究以制定EFA-DI的解释规范。预计本研究将为巴西的心理评估和儿童发展领域做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d35/7603437/dad3ea89ed8b/41155_2020_164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d35/7603437/ce1482dd496d/41155_2020_164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d35/7603437/abba72204ac6/41155_2020_164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d35/7603437/dad3ea89ed8b/41155_2020_164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d35/7603437/ce1482dd496d/41155_2020_164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d35/7603437/abba72204ac6/41155_2020_164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d35/7603437/dad3ea89ed8b/41155_2020_164_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence of validity and reliability of the adaptive functioning scale for intellectual disability (EFA-DI).智力残疾适应性功能量表(EFA-DI)的有效性和可靠性证据。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Oct 31;33(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00164-7.
2
To ID or not to ID? Changes in classification rates of intellectual disability using DSM-5.是否进行智力残疾鉴定?使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)时智力残疾分类率的变化。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Jun;52(3):165-74. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-52.3.165.
3
Validating GO4KIDDS as a brief measure of adaptive skills in special education settings for children with severe intellectual disability.验证GO4KIDDS作为重度智力残疾儿童特殊教育环境中适应技能的简短测量工具。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Mar;32(2):280-287. doi: 10.1111/jar.12524. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Rasch Validation of the Arabic Version of the Behavioral Intention to Interact With Peers With Intellectual Disability Scale.智力残疾同伴互动行为意图量表阿拉伯语版本的拉施效度验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 16;10:2345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02345. eCollection 2019.
5
The adaptive ability performance test (ADAPT): A factor analytic study in clients with intellectual disabilities.适应能力表现测试(ADAPT):智力障碍患者的因素分析研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jan;36(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/jar.13044. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
6
The Relation Between Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior in the Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability.智力残疾诊断中智力功能与适应性行为之间的关系
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;54(6):381-390. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.381.
7
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
8
Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0中文版(36项)在台湾地区的研制:效度与信度分析
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Nov;35(11):2812-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
9
Validation and Normalization of the Tower of London-Drexel University Test 2nd Edition in an Adult Population with Intellectual Disability.《伦敦塔-德雷塞尔大学测试第二版》在成年智障人群中的效度验证与标准化
Span J Psychol. 2017 Jul 20;20:E32. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.30.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Instrument Assessing the Impact of Migraine on Physical Functioning: The Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary.评估偏头痛对身体功能影响的新工具的心理计量学评价:偏头痛身体功能影响日记。
Headache. 2017 Oct;57(9):1385-1398. doi: 10.1111/head.13162. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Adaptive Behavior in Patients with Mendelian Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Comparison of ABAS-3 and Dutch Vineland Scales.测量孟德尔神经发育障碍患者的适应性行为。ABAS-3与荷兰温兰德量表的比较。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2023 Oct;20(5):453-461. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230507.
2
Effect of interactive video-based instruction on learning performance in relation to social skills of children with intellectual disability.基于互动视频的教学对智障儿童学习成绩及社交技能的影响。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2021 Nov 22;69(5):683-696. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2021.2004535. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Standardization of the Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale: Application of Item Response Theory to the Assessment of Adaptive Behavior.诊断性适应行为量表的开发与标准化:项目反应理论在适应行为评估中的应用
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Mar;121(2):79-94. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.79.
2
From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.从始至终:一种实用的方法,解决普遍存在的内部一致性估计问题。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
3
The construct of adaptive behavior: its conceptualization, measurement, and use in the field of intellectual disability.
适应行为的构建:概念化、测量及其在智力障碍领域的应用。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul;117(4):291-303. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.291.
4
Intellectual developmental disorders: towards a new name, definition and framework for "mental retardation/intellectual disability" in ICD-11.智力发育障碍:为“精神发育迟滞/智力残疾”在 ICD-11 中寻找一个新的名称、定义和框架。
World Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;10(3):175-80. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00045.x.
5
Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies.智力障碍的患病率:基于人群的研究的荟萃分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):419-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
6
Rasch analysis of Minimum Data Set mandated in skilled nursing facilities.对熟练护理机构中规定的最低数据集进行拉施分析。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(9):1385-99.
7
An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.对有序数据验证性因子分析的替代估计方法的实证评估。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):466-91. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.