Drug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30464-2. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
CH5126766 (also known as VS-6766, and previously named RO5126766), a novel MEK-pan-RAF inhibitor, has shown antitumour activity across various solid tumours; however, its initial development was limited by toxicity. We aimed to investigate the safety and toxicity profile of intermittent dosing schedules of CH5126766, and the antitumour activity of this drug in patients with solid tumours and multiple myeloma harbouring RAS-RAF-MEK pathway mutations.
We did a single-centre, open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and basket dose-expansion study at the Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust (London, UK). Patients were eligible for the study if they were aged 18 years or older, had cancers that were refractory to conventional treatment or for which no conventional therapy existed, and if they had a WHO performance status score of 0 or 1. For the dose-escalation phase, eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumours. For the basket dose-expansion phase, eligible patients had advanced or metastatic solid tumours or multiple myeloma harbouring RAS-RAF-MEK pathway mutations. During the dose-escalation phase, we evaluated three intermittent oral schedules (28-day cycles) in patients with solid tumours: (1) 4·0 mg or 3·2 mg CH5126766 three times per week; (2) 4·0 mg CH5126766 twice per week; and (3) toxicity-guided dose interruption schedule, in which treatment at the recommended phase 2 dose (4·0 mg CH5126766 twice per week) was de-escalated to 3 weeks on followed by 1 week off if patients had prespecified toxic effects (grade 2 or worse diarrhoea, rash, or creatinine phosphokinase elevation). In the basket dose-expansion phase, we evaluated antitumour activity at the recommended phase 2 dose, determined from the dose-escalation phase, in biomarker-selected patients. The primary endpoints were the recommended phase 2 dose at which no more than one out of six patients had a treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity, and the safety and toxicity profile of each dosing schedule. The key secondary endpoint was investigator-assessed response rate in the dose-expansion phase. Patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were evaluable for safety and patients who received one cycle of the study drug and underwent baseline disease assessment were evaluable for response. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02407509.
Between June 5, 2013, and Jan 10, 2019, 58 eligible patients were enrolled to the study: 29 patients with solid tumours were included in the dose-escalation cohort and 29 patients with solid tumours or multiple myeloma were included in the basket dose-expansion cohort (12 non-small-cell lung cancer, five gynaecological malignancy, four colorectal cancer, one melanoma, and seven multiple myeloma). Median follow-up at the time of data cutoff was 2·3 months (IQR 1·6-3·5). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 bilateral retinal pigment epithelial detachment in one patient who received 4·0 mg CH5126766 three times per week, and grade 3 rash (in two patients) and grade 3 creatinine phosphokinase elevation (in one patient) in those who received 3·2 mg CH5126766 three times per week. 4·0 mg CH5126766 twice per week (on Monday and Thursday or Tuesday and Friday) was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were rash (11 [19%] patients), creatinine phosphokinase elevation (six [11%]), hypoalbuminaemia (six [11%]), and fatigue (four [7%]). Five (9%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. Eight (14%) of 57 patients died during the trial due to disease progression. Seven (27% [95% CI 11·6-47·8]) of 26 response-evaluable patients in the basket expansion achieved objective responses.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that highly intermittent schedules of a RAF-MEK inhibitor has antitumour activity across various cancers with RAF-RAS-MEK pathway mutations, and that this inhibitor is tolerable. CH5126766 used as a monotherapy and in combination regimens warrants further evaluation.
Chugai Pharmaceutical.
CH5126766(也称为 VS-6766,以前称为 RO5126766),一种新型 MEK-泛 RAF 抑制剂,在各种实体瘤中显示出抗肿瘤活性;然而,其最初的发展受到毒性的限制。我们旨在研究间歇给药方案的安全性和毒性特征,以及该药物在携带 RAS-RAF-MEK 通路突变的实体瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者中的抗肿瘤活性。
我们在英国皇家马斯登国家卫生服务信托基金会(伦敦)进行了一项单中心、开放标签、I 期剂量递增和篮子剂量扩展研究。如果患者年龄在 18 岁或以上,患有对常规治疗无效或没有常规治疗的晚期或转移性实体瘤,且世界卫生组织表现状态评分为 0 或 1,则有资格参加研究。对于剂量递增阶段,合格的患者有组织学或细胞学证实的晚期或转移性实体瘤。对于篮子剂量扩展阶段,合格的患者有携带 RAS-RAF-MEK 通路突变的晚期或转移性实体瘤或多发性骨髓瘤。在剂量递增阶段,我们评估了三种在实体瘤患者中使用的间歇性口服方案(28 天周期):(1)CH5126766 4.0 mg 或 3.2 mg 每周三次;(2)CH5126766 4.0 mg 每周两次;(3)毒性指导剂量中断方案,如果患者出现预定的毒性作用(2 级或更高级别的腹泻、皮疹或肌酸磷酸激酶升高),则将推荐的 2 期剂量(CH5126766 4.0 mg 每周两次)下调至 3 周,然后休息 1 周。在篮子剂量扩展阶段,我们在生物标志物选择的患者中评估了从剂量递增阶段确定的推荐 2 期剂量的抗肿瘤活性。主要终点是无 6 例患者中有 1 例出现治疗相关剂量限制毒性的推荐 2 期剂量,以及每个给药方案的安全性和毒性特征。关键次要终点是剂量扩展阶段的研究者评估的反应率。至少接受过一次研究药物治疗的患者可进行安全性评估,接受过一个周期研究药物治疗并进行基线疾病评估的患者可进行反应评估。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT02407509。
2013 年 6 月 5 日至 2019 年 1 月 10 日期间,共有 58 名符合条件的患者入组研究:29 名患有实体瘤的患者入组剂量递增队列,29 名患有实体瘤或多发性骨髓瘤的患者入组篮子剂量扩展队列(12 例非小细胞肺癌,5 例妇科恶性肿瘤,4 例结直肠癌,1 例黑色素瘤,7 例多发性骨髓瘤)。数据截止时的中位随访时间为 2.3 个月(IQR 1.6-3.5)。剂量限制毒性包括接受 CH5126766 每周三次 4.0 mg 的患者出现 3 级双侧视网膜色素上皮脱离,以及接受 CH5126766 每周三次 3.2 mg 的患者出现 3 级皮疹(2 例)和 3 级肌酸磷酸激酶升高(1 例)。每周两次 4.0 mg CH5126766(周一和周四或周二和周五)被确定为推荐的 2 期剂量。最常见的 3-4 级治疗相关不良事件是皮疹(11[19%]例)、肌酸磷酸激酶升高(6[11%]例)、低白蛋白血症(6[11%]例)和疲劳(4[7%]例)。5(9%)例患者发生严重治疗相关不良事件。无治疗相关死亡。试验期间,由于疾病进展,57 例患者中有 8(14%)例死亡。在篮子扩展的 26 例可评估反应的患者中,有 7(27%[95%CI 11.6-47.8])例达到客观缓解。
据我们所知,这是第一项表明 RAF-MEK 抑制剂的高度间歇性方案在携带 RAF-RAS-MEK 通路突变的各种癌症中具有抗肿瘤活性,并且该抑制剂是可耐受的研究。CH5126766 作为单药治疗和联合治疗方案值得进一步评估。
Chugai Pharmaceutical。