Department of Medical Oncology, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of New South Wales Clinical School, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Linear Clinical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1306-1315. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30396-1. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Rationale exists for combined treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in a variety of solid tumours. This study aimed to investigate the safety and antitumour effects of pamiparib, an oral PARP 1/2 inhibitor, combined with tislelizumab, a humanised anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours and to determine the optimum doses for further evaluation.
We did a multicentre, open-label, phase 1a/b study at five academic sites or community oncology centres in Australia. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced solid tumours who had received one or more previous lines of therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 or less, and a life expectancy of 12 weeks or more. Patients were enrolled into one of five dose-escalation cohorts, with dose-escalation done in a 3 + 3 design. Cohorts 1-3 received intravenous tislelizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus 20, 40, or 60 mg oral pamiparib twice daily, respectively; cohorts 4 and 5 received 200 mg intravenous tislelizumab every 3 weeks plus 40 or 60 mg oral pamiparib twice daily, respectively. The primary endpoints of the phase 1a dose-escalation part of the study were safety and tolerability, including the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities and determination of the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. All primary endpoints were analysed in the safety analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of tislelizumab or pamiparib, with the exception of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities, which was analysed in the dose-limiting toxicity analysis set, which included all patients who received at least 90% of the first scheduled tislelizumab dose and at least 75% of scheduled pamiparib doses, or who had a dose-limiting toxicity event during cycle 1. Reported here are results of the phase 1a dose-escalation stage of the trial. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02660034, and is ongoing.
Between Jan 22, 2016, and May 16, 2017, we enrolled 49 patients (median age 63 years [IQR 55-67]), all of whom received at least one dose of pamiparib or tiselzumab. Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities (intractable grade 2 nausea [n=1] and grade 3 rash [n=1] in cohort 4, and grade 2 nausea and vomiting [n=1] and grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis [n=1] in cohort 5). The recommended phase 2 dose was tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus pamiparib 40 mg twice daily (the dose given in cohort 4). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (in 31 [63%] of 49 patients), fatigue (26 [53%]), diarrhoea (17 [35%]), and vomiting (15 [31%]). 23 (47%) of 49 patients had immune-related adverse events, of whom nine (39%) had asymptomatic grade 3-4 hepatic immune-related adverse events, which were reversible with corticosteroid treatment. The most common adverse event of grade 3 or worse severity was anaemia (in six [12%] patients) and no grade 5 adverse events were reported. Hepatitis or autoimmune hepatitis was the only serious adverse event to occur in two or more patients (in four [8%] patients). At a median follow-up of 8·3 months (IQR 4·8-12·8), ten (20%) of 49 patients achieved an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, including two complete responses and eight partial responses.
Pamiparib with tislelizumab was generally well tolerated and associated with antitumour responses and clinical benefit in patients with advanced solid tumours supporting further investigation of the combination of pamiparib with tislelizumab.
BeiGene.
在多种实体瘤中,联合使用免疫检查点抑制剂和聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂具有一定的理论基础。本研究旨在评估PARP1/2 抑制剂帕米帕利联合抗 PD-1 单克隆抗体替雷利珠单抗在晚期实体瘤患者中的安全性和抗肿瘤作用,并确定进一步评估的最佳剂量。
我们在澳大利亚的五家学术机构或社区肿瘤中心进行了这项多中心、开放标签、Ⅰa/Ⅰb 期研究。招募了接受过一种或多种先前治疗、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为 1 或以下、预期寿命为 12 周或以上的晚期实体瘤成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)。患者被纳入五个剂量递增队列之一,采用 3+3 设计进行剂量递增。队列 1-3 分别接受静脉注射替雷利珠单抗 2 mg/kg,每 3 周 1 次,联合口服帕米帕利 20、40 或 60 mg,每日 2 次;队列 4 和 5 分别接受静脉注射替雷利珠单抗 200 mg,每 3 周 1 次,联合口服帕米帕利 40 或 60 mg,每日 2 次。研究的Ⅰa 期剂量递增部分的主要终点为安全性和耐受性,包括剂量限制性毒性的发生和确定最大耐受剂量和推荐的Ⅱ期剂量。所有主要终点均在安全性分析集中进行分析,该分析集包括接受至少一剂替雷利珠单抗或帕米帕利的所有患者,但剂量限制性毒性的发生除外,该分析在剂量限制性毒性分析集中进行,该分析集包括接受至少 90%首次计划替雷利珠单抗剂量和至少 75%计划帕米帕利剂量的所有患者,或在第 1 周期发生剂量限制性毒性事件的患者。本研究报道了试验的Ⅰa 期剂量递增阶段的结果。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02660034,正在进行中。
2016 年 1 月 22 日至 2017 年 5 月 16 日,我们共招募了 49 名患者(中位年龄 63 岁[IQR 55-67]),所有患者均接受了至少一剂帕米帕利或替雷利珠单抗治疗。4 名患者发生剂量限制性毒性(4 队列中,1 例为无法控制的 2 级恶心,1 例为 3 级皮疹;5 队列中,1 例为 2 级恶心和呕吐,1 例为 4 级免疫介导性肝炎)。推荐的Ⅱ期剂量为替雷利珠单抗 200 mg,每 3 周 1 次,联合帕米帕利 40 mg,每日 2 次(在 4 队列中使用)。最常见的治疗相关不良事件为恶心(49 名患者中的 31 名[63%])、疲劳(26 名[53%])、腹泻(17 名[35%])和呕吐(15 名[31%])。49 名患者中有 23 名(47%)发生免疫相关不良事件,其中 9 名(39%)无症状的 3-4 级肝免疫相关不良事件,经皮质类固醇治疗后可逆转。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是贫血(6 名[12%]患者),无 5 级不良事件报告。肝炎或自身免疫性肝炎是仅发生在两名或两名以上患者的两种或两种以上严重不良事件(4 名[8%]患者)。在中位随访 8.3 个月(IQR 4.8-12.8)时,根据实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1,49 名患者中有 10 名(20%)客观缓解,包括 2 名完全缓解和 8 名部分缓解。
帕米帕利联合替雷利珠单抗总体耐受性良好,与晚期实体瘤患者的抗肿瘤作用和临床获益相关,支持进一步研究帕米帕利联合替雷利珠单抗。
贝达药业。