University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, United States.
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104304. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
Secure patient portals have improved patient access to information, including provider notes. Although there is evidence suggesting that electronic note sharing improves communication and care quality, some studies have reported provider concerns regarding note sharing.
This mixed-methods single site study utilized survey questions from a previously published landmark study to assess provider perceptions of electronic note sharing as well as objective EHR data. Surveys were sent to 628 providers in 34 primary and specialty care clinics approximately 12 weeks after the implementation of phase 1 (April 1, 2018) and phase 2 (July 1, 2018). EHR data were extracted from three months pre- and three months post-implementation of note sharing to determine whether or not note authoring times were affected.
Nearly one-quarter (n = 150) of the responses sent to 628 providers were retained for analysis (23.9 % response rate). A majority (84.7 %) of respondents believed notes were useful vehicles for communication and 73.3 % agreed that making notes available to patients was a good idea. Additionally, 16.0 % of respondents (14.0 % for primary care and 17.0 % for specialists) believed they "spent more time writing/dictating/editing their notes." A comparison of pre-post note authoring time revealed the aggregated primary care median increased 0.14 min (7.93-8.07 min) while aggregated specialty care median was identical (11.6 min).
The EHR comparison of note authoring time pre-post did not reflect provider concerns identified in the survey regarding electronic note sharing.
安全的患者门户改善了患者获取信息的途径,包括获取医生的记录。尽管有证据表明电子记录共享改善了沟通和护理质量,但一些研究报告称医生对记录共享存在担忧。
本混合方法的单站点研究使用了先前发表的具有里程碑意义的研究中的调查问题,以评估医生对电子记录共享的看法以及电子病历数据。在实施第 1 阶段(2018 年 4 月 1 日)和第 2 阶段(2018 年 7 月 1 日)后约 12 周,向 34 个初级和专科诊所的 628 名医生发送了调查。从实施记录共享前三个月和后三个月提取电子病历数据,以确定记录撰写时间是否受到影响。
在向 628 名医生发送的 628 份调查中,近四分之一(n = 150)被保留用于分析(23.9%的回复率)。大多数(84.7%)的受访者认为记录是沟通的有效工具,73.3%的受访者认为将记录提供给患者是一个好主意。此外,16.0%的受访者(初级保健医生为 14.0%,专科医生为 17.0%)认为他们“花费更多的时间撰写/口述/编辑记录”。记录撰写时间的预-后比较显示,初级保健的汇总中位数增加了 0.14 分钟(7.93-8.07 分钟),而专科保健的汇总中位数保持不变(11.6 分钟)。
电子病历数据中记录撰写时间的比较并未反映出调查中医生对电子记录共享的担忧。