• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知与现实:当临床医生的笔记与患者共享时,提供者的记录行为是否会发生变化?

Perception versus reality: Does provider documentation behavior change when clinic notes are shared electronically with patients?

机构信息

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104304. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104304
PMID:33129123
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Secure patient portals have improved patient access to information, including provider notes. Although there is evidence suggesting that electronic note sharing improves communication and care quality, some studies have reported provider concerns regarding note sharing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This mixed-methods single site study utilized survey questions from a previously published landmark study to assess provider perceptions of electronic note sharing as well as objective EHR data. Surveys were sent to 628 providers in 34 primary and specialty care clinics approximately 12 weeks after the implementation of phase 1 (April 1, 2018) and phase 2 (July 1, 2018). EHR data were extracted from three months pre- and three months post-implementation of note sharing to determine whether or not note authoring times were affected.

RESULTS

Nearly one-quarter (n = 150) of the responses sent to 628 providers were retained for analysis (23.9 % response rate). A majority (84.7 %) of respondents believed notes were useful vehicles for communication and 73.3 % agreed that making notes available to patients was a good idea. Additionally, 16.0 % of respondents (14.0 % for primary care and 17.0 % for specialists) believed they "spent more time writing/dictating/editing their notes." A comparison of pre-post note authoring time revealed the aggregated primary care median increased 0.14 min (7.93-8.07 min) while aggregated specialty care median was identical (11.6 min).

DISCUSSION

The EHR comparison of note authoring time pre-post did not reflect provider concerns identified in the survey regarding electronic note sharing.

摘要

简介

安全的患者门户改善了患者获取信息的途径,包括获取医生的记录。尽管有证据表明电子记录共享改善了沟通和护理质量,但一些研究报告称医生对记录共享存在担忧。

材料与方法

本混合方法的单站点研究使用了先前发表的具有里程碑意义的研究中的调查问题,以评估医生对电子记录共享的看法以及电子病历数据。在实施第 1 阶段(2018 年 4 月 1 日)和第 2 阶段(2018 年 7 月 1 日)后约 12 周,向 34 个初级和专科诊所的 628 名医生发送了调查。从实施记录共享前三个月和后三个月提取电子病历数据,以确定记录撰写时间是否受到影响。

结果

在向 628 名医生发送的 628 份调查中,近四分之一(n = 150)被保留用于分析(23.9%的回复率)。大多数(84.7%)的受访者认为记录是沟通的有效工具,73.3%的受访者认为将记录提供给患者是一个好主意。此外,16.0%的受访者(初级保健医生为 14.0%,专科医生为 17.0%)认为他们“花费更多的时间撰写/口述/编辑记录”。记录撰写时间的预-后比较显示,初级保健的汇总中位数增加了 0.14 分钟(7.93-8.07 分钟),而专科保健的汇总中位数保持不变(11.6 分钟)。

讨论

电子病历数据中记录撰写时间的比较并未反映出调查中医生对电子记录共享的担忧。

相似文献

1
Perception versus reality: Does provider documentation behavior change when clinic notes are shared electronically with patients?感知与现实:当临床医生的笔记与患者共享时,提供者的记录行为是否会发生变化?
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104304. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Are You In or Are You Out? Provider Note Sharing in Pediatrics.你是参与还是退出?儿科医生的医嘱共享。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Jan;11(1):166-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701679. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
Effect of an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention on Documentation Practices.基于电子健康记录的干预措施对文档记录实践的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):771-777. doi: 10.1055/a-2367-8564. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Resident Notes in an Electronic Health Record.电子健康记录中的住院医师记录
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Mar;56(3):257-262. doi: 10.1177/0009922816658651. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
5
Provider Interaction With an Electronic Health Record Notification to Identify Eligible Patients for a Cluster Randomized Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care: Secondary Analysis.医疗机构互动与电子健康记录通知以识别初级保健中预先医疗指示的群组随机试验的合格患者:二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e41884. doi: 10.2196/41884.
6
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:一项准实验研究及前瞻性观察。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):461-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002.
7
Changes in Clinician Attitudes Toward Sharing Visit Notes: Surveys Pre-and Post-Implementation.临床医生对分享就诊记录态度的变化:实施前后的调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3330-3336. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06729-1. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Stakeholder Perspectives in Anticipation of Sharing Physicians' Notes With Parents of Hospitalized Children.利益相关者对与住院儿童家长共享医生记录的预期观点。
Acad Pediatr. 2021 Mar;21(2):259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
Assessing the impact of patient access to clinical notes on clinician EHR documentation.评估患者获取临床记录对临床医生电子健康记录文档记录的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1733-1736. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac120.
10
Patients Contributing to Visit Notes: Mixed Methods Evaluation of OurNotes.患者参与就诊记录:OurNotes 的混合方法评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 8;23(11):e29951. doi: 10.2196/29951.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Patient Online Record Access on Documentation: Scoping Review.患者在线病历访问对文档记录的影响:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 20;27:e64762. doi: 10.2196/64762.
2
In Anticipation of Sharing Pediatric Inpatient Notes: Focus Group Study With Stakeholders.预期共享儿科住院病历:与利益相关者进行的焦点小组研究
J Particip Med. 2022 May 30;14(1):e37759. doi: 10.2196/37759.
3
Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Innovations and Opportunities.健康信息学中的人为因素和组织问题:创新与机遇。
Yearb Med Inform. 2021 Aug;30(1):91-99. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726511. Epub 2021 Sep 3.