Department of Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, TU Berlin, Fasanenstr. 1, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Mollerstraße 10, 20148, Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 31;20(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01840-0.
In nursing home residents, the combination of decreasing mobility and declining cognitive abilities, including spatial orientation, often leads to reduced physical activity (PA) and life-space (LS) mobility. As a consequence of sedentary behavior, there is a lack of social interaction and cognitive stimulation, resulting in low quality of life. It has not yet been examined whether cognitive-motor training including spatial cognitive tasks is suitable to improve spatial orientation and, as a consequence, to enlarge LS mobility, and increase well-being and general cognitive-motor functioning. Therefore, the overall goal of this multicentric randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the effect of three different intervention approaches including functional exercise and orientation tasks on PA, LS and spatial orientation in nursing home residents.
A three-arm single-blinded multicenter RCT with a wait-list control group will be conducted in a sample of 513 individuals (needed according to power analysis) in three different regions in Germany. In each nursing home, one of three different intervention approaches will be delivered to participating residents for 12 weeks, twice a week for 45 min each: The PROfit basic group will perform functional strength, balance, flexibility, and walking exercises always at the same location, whereas the PROfit plus group changes the location three times while performing similar/the same exercises as the PROfit basic group. The PROfit orientation group receives navigation tasks in addition to the relocation during the intervention. Physical and cognitive functioning as well as psychological measures will be assessed in all study groups at baseline. Participants will then be randomized into either the intervention group or the wait-list control group. After 12 weeks, and after 24 weeks the measures will be repeated.
This study evaluates whether the three different interventions are feasible to reduce the decline of or even improve PA, LS, and spatial orientation in nursing home residents. By adding different training locations in PROfit plus, the program is expected to be superior to PROfit basic in increasing physical and cognitive parameters. Moreover, we expect the PROfit orientation intervention to be most effective in terms of PA, LS, and spatial orientation due to two mechanisms: (1) increased physical and cognitive activity will enhance cognitive-motor capacity and (2) the spatial training will help to build up cognitive strategies to compensate for age-related loss of spatial orientation abilities and related limitations.
The trial was prospectively registered at DRKS.de with registration number DRKS00021423 on April 16, 2020 and was granted permission by the Technical University Berlin local ethics committee (No. GR_14_20191217).
在养老院居民中,行动能力下降和认知能力下降(包括空间定向)通常会导致体力活动(PA)和生活空间(LS)活动减少。由于久坐不动的行为,缺乏社会互动和认知刺激,导致生活质量下降。目前还没有研究表明,包括空间认知任务在内的认知-运动训练是否适合改善空间定向,从而扩大 LS 活动范围,提高幸福感和一般认知-运动功能。因此,本多中心随机对照试验(RCT)的总体目标是比较三种不同干预措施(包括功能锻炼和定向任务)对养老院居民 PA、LS 和空间定向的影响。
本研究采用三臂单盲多中心 RCT,设候补对照组,在德国三个不同地区的 513 名参与者(根据功效分析所需)中进行。在每个养老院中,将为参与的居民提供三种不同的干预方法中的一种,每周两次,每次 45 分钟:PROfit 基础组在同一地点进行功能力量、平衡、灵活性和步行锻炼,而 PROfit 加组则在进行与 PROfit 基础组相似/相同的锻炼时,将地点改变三次。PROfit 定向组在干预期间除了重新定位外还接受导航任务。所有研究组在基线时都进行身体和认知功能以及心理测量。然后,参与者将被随机分配到干预组或候补对照组。12 周后,24 周后重复测量。
本研究评估了三种不同的干预措施是否可行,以减少或甚至改善养老院居民的 PA、LS 和空间定向下降。通过在 PROfit plus 中增加不同的训练地点,该方案有望在提高身体和认知参数方面优于 PROfit basic。此外,我们预计 PROfit orientation 干预措施在 PA、LS 和空间定向方面最为有效,原因有二:(1)增加身体和认知活动将增强认知-运动能力;(2)空间训练将有助于建立认知策略,以弥补与年龄相关的空间定向能力丧失和相关限制。
该试验于 2020 年 4 月 16 日在 DRKS.de 前瞻性注册,注册号为 DRKS00021423,并获得柏林技术大学地方伦理委员会的许可(编号 GR_14_20191217)。