Fowler P D
Staffordshire Rheumatolog Centre, Burslem, Haywood & Tunstall War Memorial Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent.
Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp. 1987 Sep-Oct;2(5):338-66. doi: 10.1007/BF03259953.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) effectively control the symptoms of many of the rheumatic diseases although they have little effect on the underlying causes. Their effect is mainly on the mediators of the inflammatory process. Unfortunately, these mediators have important physiological roles in the maintenance of health, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract and the kidney, so that their inhibition results in many unwanted reactions of varying severity. The mechanisms underlying these reactions are described. Their occurrence varies, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and an attempt is made to assess these differences, although it may be that they are related directly to differences in dosage and therapeutic efficacy. In addition, immunologically mediated adverse reactions occur. These mechanisms are outlined and related to the clinical picture. There are considerable differences in frequency of reactions between the compounds: in particular there is a wide variation in the rate of dermatological reactions of this type. Agranulocytosis has been particularly associated with the pyrazolone compounds, although it has been reported with most others. Aplastic anaemia, which may not be an immune-mediated reaction, is also thought of as a pyrazolone reaction, but the incidence with indomethacin approaches a similar level. Although all drugs analysed may cause hepatic reactions, these are rare except with the now withdrawn benoxaprofen. Several types of immunologically mediated renal reactions occur and these rarities are also described. Paracetamol does not have any effect on the inflammatory mediators. Anxieties about this substance relates to the parent compound phenacetin and its necrotic effect on the renal papillae. There is extensive literature on this subject concerning not only paracetamol, but also aspirin and other NSAIDs. This is also assessed and summarised. The danger of paracetamol as a direct hepatic toxin in self-poisoning is discussed. Novel NSAIDs are introduced and others withdrawn with frequent and monotonous regularity. Sometimes the reasons have some medical or scientific plausibility, but often they are over-reactions by registration authorities or pharmaceutical companies in response to uninformed media publicity. The problems of the numerically and scientifically accurate collection and assessment of adverse reaction data are legion and as a result useful agents have been lost. Some of these difficulties are described, and some non-drug 'adverse reactions' are described.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)虽对许多风湿性疾病的潜在病因影响甚微,但能有效控制其症状。其作用主要针对炎症过程的介质。不幸的是,这些介质在维持健康,尤其是胃肠道和肾脏健康方面具有重要生理作用,因此对它们的抑制会导致许多不同严重程度的不良反应。文中描述了这些反应背后的机制。它们在性质和数量上的发生情况各不相同,尽管这些差异可能与剂量和治疗效果的差异直接相关,但仍尝试对其进行评估。此外,还会发生免疫介导的不良反应。文中概述了这些机制并将其与临床表现相关联。不同化合物之间反应频率存在显著差异:特别是这类皮肤病反应的发生率差异很大。粒细胞缺乏症尤其与吡唑酮类化合物有关,不过大多数其他化合物也有相关报道。再生障碍性贫血可能并非免疫介导反应,也被认为是吡唑酮类反应,但吲哚美辛的发生率与之相近。虽然所有分析的药物都可能引起肝脏反应,但除了现已撤市的贝诺洛芬外,这些反应都很罕见。还描述了几种免疫介导的肾脏反应及这些罕见情况。对乙酰氨基酚对炎症介质没有任何作用。对该物质的担忧与母体化合物非那西丁及其对肾乳头的坏死作用有关。关于这个主题不仅有大量关于对乙酰氨基酚的文献,还有关于阿司匹林和其他非甾体抗炎药的文献。本文也对此进行了评估和总结。讨论了对乙酰氨基酚在自我中毒中作为直接肝毒素的危险性。新型非甾体抗炎药不断推出,其他药物则频繁且规律地撤市。有时撤市原因有一定医学或科学依据,但往往是注册机构或制药公司对不知情的媒体宣传的过度反应。不良反应数据在数量和科学准确性方面的收集和评估问题众多,结果导致一些有用的药物被淘汰。文中描述了其中一些困难,还描述了一些非药物“不良反应”。(摘要截选至400字)