Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Department of Research, LHL-Hospital Gardermoen, Norway.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;14(1):148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.039. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
This study describes the cardiac phenotypes and markers of adverse outcome in athletes with ventricular arrhythmias with no other discernable etiology than high exercise doses.
Little is known about phenotypes and risk markers of life-threatening arrhythmic events in athletes with ventricular arrhythmia.
We compared high-performance athletes who have ventricular arrhythmia with healthy controls using clinical data and cardiac imaging. None of the patients had family history of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy or any other discernable etiology of ventricular arrhythmia. Right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) function was assessed by echocardiographic longitudinal strain (right ventricular free wall strain longitudinal [RVFWSL] and left ventricular global longitudinal strain [LVGLS]). Mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation of time to peak strain in 16 LV segments. RV ejection fraction and presence of late gadolinium enhancement was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance.
We included 43 athletes (45 ± 14 years of age, 16% female) with ventricular arrhythmias and 30 healthy athletes (41 ± 9 years of age, 7% female). Athletes with ventricular arrhythmias had worse RV function than healthy athletes by echocardiography (RVFWSL: -22.9 ± 4.8% vs. -26.6 ± 3.3%; p < 0.001) and by cardiac magnetic resonance (RV ejection fraction 48 ± 7% vs. 52 ± 6%; p = 0.04), and had more late gadolinium enhancement (24% vs. 3%; p = 0.03). Life-threatening arrhythmic events (aborted cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy) had occurred in 23 (53%) athletes with ventricular arrhythmias. These had impaired LV function compared to those with less severe ventricular arrhythmias (LVGLS: -17.1 ± 3.0% vs. -18.8 ± 2.0%; p = 0.04). LV mechanical dispersion was an independent marker of life-threatening events (adjusted odds ratio: 2.2 [1.1 to 4.8] by 10 ms increments; p = 0.03).
Athletes with ventricular arrhythmias had impaired RV function and more myocardial fibrosis compared to healthy athletes. Athletes with life-threatening arrhythmic events had additional LV contraction abnormalities. These phenotypes mimic arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and may potentially be induced by high doses of exercise in susceptible individuals.
本研究描述了除高运动量以外无其他明显病因的室性心律失常运动员的心脏表型和不良结局标志物。
对于有室性心律失常的运动员,关于危及生命的心律失常事件的表型和风险标志物知之甚少。
我们使用临床数据和心脏影像学比较了有室性心律失常的高性能运动员和健康对照者。这些患者均无心律失常性右室心肌病家族史或任何其他明显的室性心律失常病因。通过超声心动图纵向应变(右室游离壁纵向应变[RVFWSL]和左室整体纵向应变[LVGLS])评估右心室(RV)和左心室(LV)功能。机械离散度定义为 16 个 LV 节段达峰应变的标准差。通过心脏磁共振评估 RV 射血分数和晚期钆增强的存在。
我们纳入了 43 名(45 ± 14 岁,16%为女性)有室性心律失常的运动员和 30 名健康运动员(41 ± 9 岁,7%为女性)。通过超声心动图(RVFWSL:-22.9 ± 4.8%比-26.6 ± 3.3%;p < 0.001)和心脏磁共振(RV 射血分数 48 ± 7%比 52 ± 6%;p = 0.04),有室性心律失常的运动员的 RV 功能比健康运动员差,且有更多的晚期钆增强(24%比 3%;p = 0.03)。危及生命的心律失常事件(心搏骤停、持续性室性心动过速或适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗)已发生在 23 名(53%)有室性心律失常的运动员中。与室性心律失常程度较轻的运动员相比,这些运动员的 LV 功能受损(LVGLS:-17.1 ± 3.0%比-18.8 ± 2.0%;p = 0.04)。LV 机械离散度是危及生命事件的独立标志物(每增加 10 ms,调整后的优势比:2.2 [1.1 至 4.8];p = 0.03)。
与健康运动员相比,有室性心律失常的运动员的 RV 功能受损且心肌纤维化更多。有危及生命的心律失常事件的运动员有额外的 LV 收缩异常。这些表型类似于致心律失常性右室心肌病,可能是由于易感个体的高运动量引起的。