• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨肿瘤的瘤内刮除术与假体置换术——生物力学中保肢模拟的有限元分析案例

Intralesional curettage versus prosthetic replacement for bone tumors - a finite element analysis case of limb salvage simulation in biomechanics.

作者信息

Peng Matthew JianQiao, Cao XiongWei, Chen Hai-Yan, Hu Yong, Li XinXu, Lao YongQiang, Bai Bo

机构信息

Orthopedics Dept. of 1st Affiliated Hospital, GuangZhou Medical University, China.

ENT Dept. Guanghai Central Hospital, Taishan, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Jan;198:105775. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105775. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105775
PMID:33130494
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare mechanical properties of femoral tumor treatments so that better operative strategy for limb tumors surgery is optimized.

METHODS

Fourteen femoral CT images were randomly selected to rebuild 3D models by MIMICS. They were then executed by reverse engineering softwares for simulative modes. Mode #1: Intralesional curettage with cement filled plus fixator; Mode #2: Distal femur resection with tumorous prosthesis replaced. Finally, the mechanical aspects such as stress and displacement were compared by finite element analysis.

RESULTS

Analyzed by AnSys, the observation indexes were measured as follows: for displacement of femurs, d=1.4762 (< a=3.9042 < c=3.9845 < b=4.1159) in mm is the most staple of all models; for displacement of implants (fixators or prostheses), it's similar to the behavior of femurs and with no significant difference; for stresses of femurs, no significant difference was found among all models; the stresses of implants (fixations and prostheses) were observed as d=39.6334 (< a=58.6206 < c=61.8150 < b=62.6626) in MPa correspondently, which is the least; for stresses of the general system, the average of peak values for integrated devices of all models are: d=40.8072 (< a=58.6206 < c=61.7831< b=62.6626) in MPa, which is also the least. As a final result, both maximum values for displacement and stress of mode 2 are lower than those of mode 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finite element analysis of limb salvage simulation in biomechanics proved that, to treat distal femoral bone tumors, prosthetic replacement is more efficient than intralesional curettage.

摘要

背景与目的

比较股骨肿瘤治疗的力学性能,以优化肢体肿瘤手术的更佳手术策略。

方法

随机选取14例股骨CT图像,通过MIMICS重建三维模型。然后使用逆向工程软件执行模拟模式。模式1:病灶内刮除并填充骨水泥加固定器;模式2:股骨远端切除并置换肿瘤假体。最后,通过有限元分析比较应力和位移等力学方面。

结果

通过AnSys分析,观察指标测量如下:对于股骨位移,所有模型中d = 1.4762(< a = 3.9042 < c = 3.9845 < b = 4.1159)mm是最主要的;对于植入物(固定器或假体)的位移,其与股骨的情况相似且无显著差异;对于股骨应力,所有模型之间未发现显著差异;植入物(固定器和假体)的应力分别观察为d = 39.6334(< a = 58.6206 < c = 61.8150 < b = 62.6626)MPa,这是最小的;对于整个系统的应力,所有模型的集成装置峰值平均值为:d = 40.8072(< a = 58.6206 < c = 61.7831 < b = 62.6626)MPa,这也是最小的。最终结果是,模式2的位移和应力最大值均低于模式1。

结论

我们对肢体挽救模拟的生物力学有限元分析证明,治疗股骨远端骨肿瘤时,假体置换比病灶内刮除更有效。

相似文献

1
Intralesional curettage versus prosthetic replacement for bone tumors - a finite element analysis case of limb salvage simulation in biomechanics.骨肿瘤的瘤内刮除术与假体置换术——生物力学中保肢模拟的有限元分析案例
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Jan;198:105775. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105775. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
2
All-polyethylene tibial components in distal femur limb-salvage surgery: a finite element analysis based on promising clinical outcomes.全聚乙烯胫骨部件在股骨远端肢体挽救手术中的应用:基于良好临床结果的有限元分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Apr 4;12(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0555-6.
3
Finite Element Analysis of porously punched prosthetic short stem virtually designed for simulative uncemented Hip Arthroplasty.虚拟设计用于模拟非骨水泥型髋关节置换术的多孔冲压假体短柄的有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 11;18(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1651-9.
4
3D Finite Element Analysis of the Modular Prosthesis with Tooth Mechanism of the Femoral Shaft.股骨干带齿机制模块化假体的三维有限元分析
Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):946-956. doi: 10.1111/os.12685. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.三种植体和四种植体支持的下颌骨螺旋固位修复体的生物力学:一项三维有限元分析研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):68.e1-68.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
Biomechanical and finite element study of drilling sites for benign lesions in femoral head and neck with curettage, bone-grafting and internal fixation.股骨头颈良性病变刮除、植骨及内固定钻孔部位的生物力学及有限元研究。
Math Biosci Eng. 2019 Aug 27;16(6):7808-7828. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019392.
7
Finite-Element analysis of a lateral femoro-tibial impact on the total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换中股骨-胫骨外侧撞击的有限元分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Aug;192:105446. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105446. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
8
The effect of the necrotic area on the biomechanics of the femoral head - a finite element study.股骨头坏死区对其生物力学的影响:一项有限元研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03242-0.
9
Comparative analysis for five fixations of Pauwels-I by the biomechanical finite-element method.生物力学有限元法对 Pauwels-I 五种固定方式的比较分析。
J Invest Surg. 2020 Jun;33(5):428-437. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1533054. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Biomechanical analysis for five fixation techniques of Pauwels-III fracture by finite element modeling.基于有限元模型对 Pauwels-III 型骨折五种固定技术的生物力学分析
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Sep;193:105491. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105491. Epub 2020 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the optimal reconstruction strategy for Enneking III defects in pelvis bone tumors: a finite element analysis.探索骨盆骨肿瘤Enneking III型缺损的最佳重建策略:有限元分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05500-0.
2
Individualized Design Application of 3-Dimensional Printing Navigational Template for Pedicle Screw Installation: A Training Case Report.三维打印导航模板个体化设计在椎弓根螺钉置钉中的应用:培训病例报告。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Aug 12;30:e941715. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941715.
3
Clinical evaluation of the three-dimensional printed strut-type prosthesis combined with autograft reconstruction for giant cell tumor of the distal femur.
三维打印支撑型假体联合自体骨移植重建治疗股骨远端骨巨细胞瘤的临床评估
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 22;13:1206765. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1206765. eCollection 2023.
4
Design and performance analysis of 3D-printed stiffness gradient femoral scaffold.3D 打印刚度梯度股骨支架的设计与性能分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 18;18(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03612-z.
5
Porous metal block based on topology optimization to treat distal femoral bone defect in total knee revision.基于拓扑优化的多孔金属块治疗全膝关节翻修时的股骨远端骨缺损
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023 Jun;22(3):961-970. doi: 10.1007/s10237-023-01692-8. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
Cementless curved endoprosthesis stem for distal femoral reconstruction in a Chinese population: a combined anatomical & biomechanical study.中文人群股骨远端重建用非骨水泥型弯柄假体柄:解剖与生物力学联合研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 8;23(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05801-z.
7
Biomechanical Comparison Between Porous Ti6Al4V Block and Tumor Prosthesis UHMWPE Block for the Treatment of Distal Femur Bone Defects.多孔Ti6Al4V块与肿瘤假体超高分子量聚乙烯块治疗股骨远端骨缺损的生物力学比较
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jul 5;10:939371. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.939371. eCollection 2022.
8
A biomechanical comparison between cement packing combined with extra fixation and three-dimensional printed strut-type prosthetic reconstruction for giant cell tumor of bone in distal femur.水泥填充联合额外固定与 3D 打印支撑型假体重建治疗股骨远端骨巨细胞瘤的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 9;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03039-y.