• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国脊柱手术中椎弓根和侧块螺钉位置不当的医学法律影响。

The medicolegal impact of misplaced pedicle and lateral mass screws on spine surgery in the United States.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and.

2ProKarma Inc., Omaha, Nebraska.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E20. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20600.

DOI:10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20600
PMID:33130620
Abstract

Spine surgery has been disproportionately impacted by medical liability and malpractice litigation, with the majority of claims and payouts related to procedural error. One common area for the potential avoidance of malpractice claims and subsequent payouts involves misplaced pedicle and/or lateral mass instrumentation. However, the medicolegal impact of misplaced screws on spine surgery has not been directly reported in the literature. The authors of the current study aimed to describe this impact in the United States, as well as to suggest a potential method for mitigating the problem.This retrospective analysis of 68 closed medicolegal cases related to misplaced screws in spine surgery showed that neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons were equally named as the defendant (n = 32 and 31, respectively), and cases were most commonly due to misplaced lumbar pedicle screws (n = 41, 60.3%). Litigation resulted in average payouts of $1,204,422 ± $753,832 between 1995 and 2019, when adjusted for inflation. The median time to case closure was 56.3 (35.2-67.2) months when ruled in favor of the plaintiff (i.e., patient) compared to 61.5 (51.4-77.2) months for defendant (surgeon) verdicts (p = 0.117).

摘要

脊柱外科手术受到医疗责任和医疗事故诉讼的不成比例的影响,大多数索赔和理赔都与程序错误有关。一个潜在的避免医疗事故索赔和随后理赔的常见领域涉及到椎弓根和/或侧块器械的错位。然而,文献中尚未直接报道螺钉错位对脊柱手术的法医学影响。本研究的作者旨在描述美国的这种影响,并提出一种潜在的方法来减轻这一问题。

这项回顾性分析了 68 例与脊柱手术中螺钉错位相关的已结案医疗事故案例,结果显示,神经外科医生和骨科脊柱外科医生同样被列为被告(分别为 32 名和 31 名),且大多数案例是由于腰椎椎弓根螺钉错位(41 例,60.3%)。1995 年至 2019 年,经通胀调整后,诉讼的平均赔偿金额为 1,204,422 美元±753,832 美元。当有利于原告(即患者)时,案件结案的中位数时间为 56.3(35.2-67.2)个月,而有利于被告(外科医生)的裁决为 61.5(51.4-77.2)个月(p = 0.117)。

相似文献

1
The medicolegal impact of misplaced pedicle and lateral mass screws on spine surgery in the United States.美国脊柱手术中椎弓根和侧块螺钉位置不当的医学法律影响。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E20. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20600.
2
Malpractice litigation in elective lumbar spinal fusion: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the U.S. in the past 50 years.选择性腰椎融合术的医疗事故诉讼:对过去 50 年美国报告的法律索赔进行的全面综述。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
3
The medicolegal landscape of spine surgery: how do surgeons fare?脊柱外科的医法领域:外科医生表现如何?
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Litigation involving sports-related spinal injuries: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the United States in the past 70 years.涉及与运动相关的脊柱损伤的诉讼:对美国过去70年报告的法律索赔的全面回顾。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Medical malpractice and meningiomas: an analysis of 47 cases.医疗事故与脑膜瘤:47 例分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E22. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20598.
6
Predictors of Medical Malpractice Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Analysis From 2010 to 2019.脊柱手术后医疗事故结果的预测因素:2010年至2019年的综合分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Jul 1;34(6):228-235. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001184.
7
Medical Malpractice in Orthopedic Surgery: A Westlaw-Based Demographic Analysis.骨科手术中的医疗过失:基于Westlaw的人口统计学分析
Orthopedics. 2018 Sep 1;41(5):e615-e620. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180621-06. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
8
Descriptive Analysis of State and Federal Spine Surgery Malpractice Litigation in the United States.美国州与联邦脊柱外科医疗事故诉讼的描述性分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jul 15;43(14):984-990. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002510.
9
Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.脊柱手术后的医疗事故诉讼。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16646. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
10
Medical Malpractice Claims Following Incidental Durotomy Due to Spinal Surgery.因脊柱手术导致硬脊膜意外切开后的医疗事故索赔。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jul 1;43(13):940-945. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002469.

引用本文的文献

1
Where are all the neurosurgery robots?神经外科手术机器人都在哪里?
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 4;19(1):267. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02435-w.
2
Navigation Experience in Latin-American Spine Surgeons: A Survey.拉丁美洲脊柱外科医生的导航经验:一项调查。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11):e74723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74723. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Delayed neurological deficit due to a medially misplaced thoracic pedicle screw during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction: a complication 6 years in the making.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸矫正术中因胸段椎弓根螺钉内侧移位导致的迟发性神经功能缺损:一种长达6年才显现的并发症。
Spine Deform. 2025 Jan;13(1):311-324. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00951-7. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
4
Analysis of reasons for medical malpractice litigation due to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术导致医疗事故诉讼的原因分析
World Neurosurg X. 2024 Mar 29;23:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100371. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Pedicle screw accuracy placed with assistance of machine vision technology in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.肌神经脊柱侧凸患者应用机器视觉技术辅助置钉的准确性。
Spine Deform. 2024 May;12(3):739-746. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00830-1. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Assessing intraoperative pedicle screw placement accuracy using biplanar radiographs compared to three-dimensional imaging.使用双平面 X 光片与三维成像评估术中椎弓根螺钉放置的准确性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 8;18(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01760-2.
7
Let's think beyond the pedicle: A biomechanical study of a new conceptual extra pedicular screw and hook construct.让我们跳出椎弓根思考:一种新型概念性椎弓根外螺钉和钩结构的生物力学研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jun 4;41:102173. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102173. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Why are spine surgeons sued, and with what outcomes?脊柱外科医生为何会被起诉,结果如何?
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Feb 10;14:46. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1172_2022. eCollection 2023.