• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

怀疑与不信:Mrdjenovich 2018 年如何误解(非)宗教与健康的关系。

In Doubt and Disbelief: How Mrdjenovich 2018 Misunderstands the (Non)Religion-Health Relationship.

机构信息

University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.

Atheist Research Collaborative, .

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2022 Jun;61(3):2319-2322. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-01109-1. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10943-020-01109-1
PMID:33130997
Abstract

The article, "Religiously/Spiritually Involved, but in Doubt or Disbelief-Why? Healthy?" (Mrdjenovich in J Relig Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0711-2 , 2018) addressed why subsets of Nones would engage in religious activities. While the subject matter of Mrdjenovich's work is important and understudied, several problematic conclusions about the nonreligion-health field were drawn. We provide constructive criticisms of Mrdjenovich's methodologies, conclusions, and characterizations of the nonreligion-health field, and offer several solutions to the problems identified.

摘要

文章《宗教/精神参与,但怀疑或不信——为什么?健康?》(Mrdjenovich 在 J 宗教健康。https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0711-2,2018 年)探讨了为什么非宗教群体的一些人会参与宗教活动。虽然 Mrdjenovich 工作的主题很重要且研究不足,但对非宗教与健康领域得出了一些有问题的结论。我们对 Mrdjenovich 的方法、结论以及对非宗教与健康领域的描述提出了建设性的批评,并提供了一些解决已识别问题的方法。

相似文献

1
In Doubt and Disbelief: How Mrdjenovich 2018 Misunderstands the (Non)Religion-Health Relationship.怀疑与不信:Mrdjenovich 2018 年如何误解(非)宗教与健康的关系。
J Relig Health. 2022 Jun;61(3):2319-2322. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-01109-1. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
2
Fishing in a Puddle of Doubt and Disbelief?: A Rejoinder to the Speed et al. Commentary.质疑与不信的泥沼中钓鱼?——对斯皮德等人评论的回应。
J Relig Health. 2022 Jun;61(3):2323-2330. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01200-1. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Religiously/Spiritually Involved, but in Doubt or Disbelief-Why? Healthy?宗教/精神层面有所涉入,但心存疑虑或不信——为何?健康方面呢?
J Relig Health. 2019 Oct;58(5):1488-1515. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0711-2.
4
The origins of religious disbelief.宗教怀疑论的起源。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;17(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
5
The Negative Religiousness-IQ Nexus is a Jensen Effect on Individual-Level Data: A Refutation of Dutton et al.'s 'The Myth of the Stupid Believer'.负面宗教与智商的关联是个体层面数据的詹森效应:对达顿等人《愚蠢信徒的神话》的驳斥
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3253-3275. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01351-1. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
Religion, Nonreligion, and Deviance: Comparing Faith's and Family's Relative Strength in Promoting Social Conformity.宗教、非宗教与越轨行为:比较信仰和家庭在促进社会遵从方面的相对力量。
J Relig Health. 2019 Feb;58(1):206-220. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0630-2.
7
Toward equality: Including non-human animals in studies of lived religion and nonreligion.走向平等:将非人类动物纳入生活中的宗教与非宗教研究
Soc Compass. 2024 Sep;71(3):406-424. doi: 10.1177/00377686231170993. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Understanding and addressing religion among people with mental illness.了解和解决精神病患者的宗教信仰问题。
World Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;12(1):26-32. doi: 10.1002/wps.20005.
9
Good for All? Hardly! Attending Church Does Not Benefit Religiously Unaffiliated.对所有人都有益?几乎不可能!参加教会对无宗教信仰者并无益处。
J Relig Health. 2017 Jun;56(3):986-1002. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0317-5.
10
How can big data shape the field of non-religion studies? And why does it matter?大数据如何塑造非宗教研究领域?以及为何这很重要?
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Jun 11;2(6):100263. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100263.

引用本文的文献

1
Fishing in a Puddle of Doubt and Disbelief?: A Rejoinder to the Speed et al. Commentary.质疑与不信的泥沼中钓鱼?——对斯皮德等人评论的回应。
J Relig Health. 2022 Jun;61(3):2323-2330. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01200-1. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Unbelievable?! Theistic/Epistemological Viewpoint Affects Religion-Health Relationship.难以置信?!有神论/认识论观点影响宗教与健康的关系。
J Relig Health. 2017 Feb;56(1):238-257. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0271-2.