PGY-2 Infectious Diseases Pharmacy Resident, Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States.
Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 1331 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50309, United States.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Jan;13(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
There is a paucity of data on educational interventions that prepare students to mitigate the stigma or burden of alcohol use disorder. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the impact of an interprofessional symposium on personal knowledge and stigma of alcohol use disorder and (2) inform future educational models.
The symposium highlighted the impact of alcohol at one private Midwestern university and reviewed the pharmacology of alcohol, diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorder, and treatment for alcohol use disorder. Prior to and after the symposium, participants were given nine statements (two knowledge-based and seven stigma-based) about alcohol use disorder. Agreement with each statement was measuring on a five-point rating scale, and responses were collapsed into three categories: 1 = low stigma/high understanding, 2 = neutral, and 3 = high stigma/low understanding. Change between response categories before and after the symposium were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-ranked test (W).
A total of 87 responses were collected pre-symposium and 45 responses were collected post-symposium. Both knowledge-based statements showed an increase in individual respondent understanding of alcohol use disorder as a disease. All stigma-based statements conveyed a decrease in individual respondent stigma of alcohol use disorder as a disease. Test statistics (Z) for significant items raged between Z = 3 to 5, P < .05.
The symposium was successful at conveying positive changes in attitudes toward alcohol use disorder.
目前针对学生减轻酒精使用障碍污名或负担的教育干预措施的数据较少。本研究的目的是:(1)评估跨专业研讨会对个人对酒精使用障碍的知识和污名的影响;(2)为未来的教育模式提供信息。
该研讨会重点介绍了一所私立中西部大学的酒精影响,并回顾了酒精的药理学、酒精使用障碍的诊断标准以及酒精使用障碍的治疗方法。在研讨会之前和之后,参与者都要对九个关于酒精使用障碍的陈述(两个基于知识,七个基于污名)进行评价。对每个陈述的同意程度采用五分制评分,反应分为三个类别:1=低污名/高理解,2=中立,3=高污名/低理解。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验(W)分析研讨会前后反应类别的变化。
共收集了 87 份研讨会前的回复和 45 份研讨会后的回复。两个基于知识的陈述都显示出个体对酒精使用障碍作为一种疾病的理解有所增加。所有基于污名的陈述都表明个体对酒精使用障碍作为一种疾病的污名有所减少。具有统计学意义的项目的检验统计量(Z)范围在 Z=3 到 5 之间,P<0.05。
研讨会成功地传达了对酒精使用障碍态度的积极变化。