Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 10 Buangkok View, Singapore, 539747, Singapore.
School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03106-4.
After decades of anti-stigma initiatives, the Advancing Research To Eliminate Mental Illness Stigma (ARTEMIS) intervention study is one of the first in Singapore to evaluate the effects of an anti-stigma intervention on attitudes towards depression in university students.
390 university students from a local university in Singapore were voluntarily recruited for the study. The ARTEMIS intervention comprises an educational and social contact component, as well as a question and answer (Q&A) session with experts in the area of mental health. The Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness (CAMI) scale was administered at baseline, post-intervention and at 3-months follow-up. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted.
The CFA identified a 3-factor model for the CAMI with a decent fit (RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.93, SRMR = 0.06). Favourable shifts in attitudes across the factors were observed immediately after the intervention (p < 0.001). Gender (β = - 1.19, 95% CI: - 2.10, - 0.27, p = 0.01) and nationality (β = - 1.23, 95% CI: - 2.35, - 0.11, p = 0.03) were identified as significant correlates for the community mental health ideology (CMHI) factor. Linear effects indicated that having a close social contact with mental illness observed a smaller decrease in authoritarianism scores from pre- to post-intervention (β = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.18, 1.53, p = 0.01); whereas quadratic effects found a greater decrease in scores from post-intervention to after 3-months for benevolence (β = - 0.34, 95% CI: - 0.52, - 0.16, p < 0.001) and CMHI (β = - 0.22, 95% CI: - 0.45, - 0.002, p = 0.048).
The anti-stigma intervention shows promising short-term results across the CAMI dimensions even after adjusting for sociodemographic correlates. However, the intervention did not observe the sustained attitude shifts after 3-months. Recommendations for future anti-stigma interventions were also considered.
经过几十年的反污名化倡议,推进消除精神疾病污名化研究(ARTEMIS)干预研究是新加坡首批评估反污名化干预对大学生对抑郁症态度影响的研究之一。
390 名来自新加坡当地大学的学生自愿参加了这项研究。ARTEMIS 干预包括教育和社会接触部分,以及与心理健康领域专家的问答(Q&A)环节。在基线、干预后和 3 个月随访时使用社区对精神疾病的态度量表(CAMI)进行评估。进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)。
CFA 确定了 CAMI 的 3 因素模型,拟合度良好(RMSEA=0.06,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.93,SRMR=0.06)。干预后立即观察到各因素态度的有利转变(p<0.001)。性别(β=-1.19,95%CI:-2.10,-0.27,p=0.01)和国籍(β=-1.23,95%CI:-2.35,-0.11,p=0.03)被确定为社区心理健康意识形态(CMHI)因素的显著相关因素。线性效应表明,与精神疾病有密切社会接触的人,从干预前到干预后,权威主义评分的下降幅度较小(β=0.85,95%CI:0.18,1.53,p=0.01);而二次效应发现,从干预后到 3 个月后,对仁爱的评分下降幅度更大(β=-0.34,95%CI:-0.52,-0.16,p<0.001)和 CMHI(β=-0.22,95%CI:-0.45,-0.002,p=0.048)。
即使考虑了社会人口学相关因素,反污名化干预在 CAMI 各维度上仍显示出有希望的短期效果。然而,干预后 3 个月并未观察到持续的态度转变。还考虑了对未来反污名化干预的建议。