• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾婴儿及其家庭的早期干预:定量分析

Early intervention for disabled infants and their families: a quantitative analysis.

作者信息

Shonkoff J P, Hauser-Cram P

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester 01605.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1987 Nov;80(5):650-8.

PMID:3313255
Abstract

In an evaluation of 31 selected studies, statistical procedures for synthesizing data (meta-analysis) were used to assess the effects of early intervention services on disabled children younger than 3 years of age and on their families. Results indicate that early intervention is effective in promoting developmental progress in infants and toddlers with biologically based disabilities. Programs that served a heterogeneous group of children, provided a structured curriculum, and targeted their efforts on parents and children together appeared to be the most effective. Definitive evaluation of the efficacy of early intervention programs is tempered by the restricted range of outcomes measured and by a paucity of information about the children and families enrolled in such programs, as well as about the specific nature of the services received. Despite their limitations, available data provide the basis for a rational pediatric approach to early intervention programs, while highlighting specific directions for further investigation.

摘要

在对31项选定研究的评估中,采用了数据综合统计程序(荟萃分析)来评估早期干预服务对3岁以下残疾儿童及其家庭的影响。结果表明,早期干预对于促进患有先天性残疾的婴幼儿的发育进程是有效的。服务于不同类型儿童群体、提供结构化课程并且同时针对家长和儿童开展工作的项目似乎最为有效。由于所测量结果的范围有限,以及关于参与此类项目的儿童和家庭的信息匮乏,包括所接受服务的具体性质,早期干预项目疗效的确切评估受到了影响。尽管存在局限性,但现有数据为合理的儿科早期干预项目方法提供了依据,同时也突出了进一步研究的具体方向。

相似文献

1
Early intervention for disabled infants and their families: a quantitative analysis.残疾婴儿及其家庭的早期干预:定量分析
Pediatrics. 1987 Nov;80(5):650-8.
2
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
3
The Brookline Early Education Project: a 25-year follow-up study of a family-centered early health and development intervention.布鲁克莱恩早期教育项目:一项以家庭为中心的早期健康与发展干预措施的25年随访研究。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):144-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2515.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
5
Thirty-six-month outcomes for families of children who have disabilities and participated in early intervention.残疾儿童家庭参与早期干预的36个月结果。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1346-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1239.
6
The Pediatric Alliance for Coordinated Care: evaluation of a medical home model.儿科协调护理联盟:医疗之家模式评估
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1507-16.
7
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
8
Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference?基层医疗儿科中的扫盲促进:我们能有所作为吗?
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 2):927-34.
9
Healthy Steps: a case study of innovation in pediatric practice.健康步伐:儿科实践创新的案例研究
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):820-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0999-L.
10
Early intervention in South Africa: moving beyond hearing screening.南非的早期干预:超越听力筛查
Int J Audiol. 2008;47 Suppl 1:S36-43. doi: 10.1080/14992020802294040.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating a pilot eLearning program as an educational tool for child health and developmental surveillance in general practice.评估一个试点电子学习项目作为全科医疗中儿童健康与发育监测的教育工具。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Nov 12;9:255. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000255.1. eCollection 2020.
2
Harnessing neuroplasticity to improve motor performance in infants with cerebral palsy: a study protocol for the GAME randomised controlled trial.利用神经可塑性提高脑瘫婴儿运动表现: GAME 随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 10;13(3):e070649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070649.
3
ASQ-3 and BSID-III's concurrent validity and predictive ability of cognitive outcome at 5 years.
ASQ-3 和 BSID-III 在 5 岁时认知结果的同时效度和预测能力。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Oct;94(4):1465-1471. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02528-y. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
4
Down Syndrome: how to communicate the diagnosis.唐氏综合征:如何沟通诊断结果。
Ital J Pediatr. 2023 Feb 9;49(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13052-023-01419-6.
5
Prevalence of Genetic Diagnoses in a Cohort With Valvar Pulmonary Stenosis.瓣膜性肺动脉瓣狭窄患者的基因诊断患病率。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2022 Aug;15(4):e003635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003635. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools.基于证据的发育监测工具里程碑。
Pediatrics. 2022 Mar 1;149(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052138.
7
Depression and neurocognitive dysfunction in pediatric and young adult chronic kidney disease.儿童和青年慢性肾脏病中的抑郁和神经认知功能障碍。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 Sep;34(9):1575-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00467-019-04265-z. Epub 2019 May 2.
8
Usefulness of the Korean Developmental Screening Test for infants and children for the evaluation of developmental delay in Korean infants and children: a single-center study.韩国婴幼儿发育筛查测试在评估韩国婴幼儿发育迟缓方面的效用:一项单中心研究。
Korean J Pediatr. 2017 Oct;60(10):312-319. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2017.60.10.312. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
9
Current evidence-based recommendations on investigating children with global developmental delay.关于对全面发育迟缓儿童进行调查的当前循证建议。
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Nov;102(11):1071-1076. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311271.
10
Genomic Disorders and Neurocognitive Impairment in Pediatric CKD.儿童慢性肾脏病中的基因组疾病与神经认知障碍
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Aug;28(8):2303-2309. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016101108. Epub 2017 Mar 27.