Albagieh Hamad, Aloyouny Ashwag, Alshehri Nojoud, Alsammahi Noor, Almutrafi Dima, Hadlaq Emad
Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Science Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Basic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Oct;28(10):1238-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
There are many treatment modalities for myofascial pain, and recent findings reported in the literature highlight the superiority of using local anesthetics as the treatment of choice. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two of the most used local anesthetic agents-lidocaine and mepivacaine-in the management of myofascial pain.
Thirty patients (20 females, 10 males) were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 50% received lidocaine and 50% received mepivacaine. Trigger point injections in the orofacial region were administered 4 times, 10 days between each injection, with 4 weeks of follow-up after the end of the treatment course. Pain levels were recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS) at the time of follow-up and 30 min after injection.
All patients exhibited statistically significant improvement when comparing pre- and post-treatment mean values. Both local anesthetics (i.e., lidocaine and mepivacaine) were similarly effective for the management of myofascial pain (p = 0.875). The mepivacaine-treated group exhibited significantly lower post-injection tenderness than the lidocaine group (p = 0.038). There was no relationship between sex and treatment response. Female and male patients both reported similar responses in terms of VAS scores (p = 0.818).
No drug was superior in the long term; thus, the clinician's choice can be based on drug availability and patient medical history.
肌筋膜疼痛有多种治疗方式,文献中近期报道的研究结果突出了使用局部麻醉剂作为首选治疗方法的优越性。本研究的目的是比较两种最常用的局部麻醉剂——利多卡因和甲哌卡因——在治疗肌筋膜疼痛方面的有效性。
30例患者(20例女性,10例男性)被随机分为两组:50%接受利多卡因治疗,50%接受甲哌卡因治疗。在口面部区域进行触发点注射,共注射4次,每次注射间隔10天,治疗疗程结束后随访4周。在随访时和注射后30分钟,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录疼痛程度。
比较治疗前后的平均值时,所有患者均表现出具有统计学意义的改善。两种局部麻醉剂(即利多卡因和甲哌卡因)在治疗肌筋膜疼痛方面同样有效(p = 0.875)。甲哌卡因治疗组注射后的压痛明显低于利多卡因组(p = 0.038)。性别与治疗反应之间没有关联。女性和男性患者在VAS评分方面报告的反应相似(p = 0.818)。
从长期来看,没有哪种药物更具优势;因此,临床医生的选择可以基于药物的可获得性和患者的病史。