Vaverková Zuzana, Milton Amy L, Merlo Emiliano
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Sep 29;14:574358. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.574358. eCollection 2020.
Maladaptive emotional memories contribute to the persistence of many mental health disorders, and therefore the prospect of disrupting these memories to produce long-term reductions in relapse is of great clinical appeal. Reducing the impact of maladaptive emotional memories on behaviour could be achieved by two retrieval-dependent manipulations that engage separate mnemonic processes: "reconsolidation disruption" and "extinction enhancement." Extinction occurs during a prolonged re-exposure session in the absence of the expected emotional outcome and is widely accepted as reflecting the formation of a new, inhibitory memory that prevents behavioural expression of the original trace. Reconsolidation, by contrast, involves the destabilisation of the original memory, allowing for subsequent updating and restabilisation in specific brain regions, unless the re-stabilization process is prevented through specific pharmacological or behavioural interventions. Both destabilisation of the original memory and memory extinction require that re-exposure induces prediction error-a mismatch between what is expected and what actually occurs-but the parameters that allow reconsolidation and extinction to occur, and control the transition between them, have not been well-characterised. Here, we review what is known about the induction of memory destabilisation and extinction, and the transition period that separates these mnemonic processes, drawing on preclinical and clinical examples. A deeper understanding of the processes that determine the alternative routes to memory persistence or inhibition is critical for designing new and more reliable clinical treatments targeting maladaptive emotional memories.
适应不良的情绪记忆会导致多种心理健康障碍持续存在,因此,通过干扰这些记忆来长期降低复发率的前景具有很大的临床吸引力。减少适应不良的情绪记忆对行为的影响可以通过两种依赖于提取的操作来实现,这两种操作涉及不同的记忆过程:“重新巩固破坏”和“消退增强”。消退发生在长时间的重新暴露过程中,此时没有预期的情绪结果,并且被广泛认为反映了一种新的抑制性记忆的形成,这种记忆会阻止原始记忆痕迹的行为表达。相比之下,重新巩固涉及原始记忆的不稳定,允许随后在特定脑区进行更新和重新稳定,除非通过特定的药理学或行为干预来阻止重新稳定过程。原始记忆的不稳定和记忆消退都需要重新暴露引发预测误差——预期与实际发生情况之间的不匹配——但允许重新巩固和消退发生并控制它们之间转换的参数尚未得到很好的表征。在这里,我们回顾了关于记忆不稳定和消退的诱导以及分隔这些记忆过程的过渡期的已知情况,并借鉴了临床前和临床实例。深入了解决定记忆持续或抑制的替代途径的过程对于设计针对适应不良情绪记忆的新的、更可靠的临床治疗至关重要。