Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术中应用LC-DCP进行股骨假体周围骨折内面翻固定的可行性

Feasibility of the Inner-Side-Out Use of the LC-DCP for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Won Heejae, Kim Jun-Young, Baek Seung-Hoon, Hong Wonki, Yoon Jee-Wook, Kim Shin-Yoon

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130, Dongdeok-ro, Jung-Gu, Daegu, 41944 Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, 33, Duryugongwon-ro 17-gil, Nam-gu, Daegu, 42472 Korea.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2020 Jul 30;54(6):879-884. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00200-9. eCollection 2020 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal technique for plate fixation to treat type B and C periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) is unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic results of inner-side-out limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) to treat PFFs during or after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised of four men and six women with an average age of 64.7 years who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with an inner-side-out LC-DCP technique to treat PFFs; the reduction was maintained preliminary with the use of contoured plate and cables, and the grooves on the undersurface of LC-DCP for limited contact was used to hold and prevent the cables from slippage during tightening the cables. There were five intraoperative and five postoperative PFFs after THA. According to the Vancouver classification, the intraoperative PFFs included type B2 in two, B3 in one and C3 in two patients while postoperative PFFs were categorized into type B1 in one, type B2 in two and type C in two patients. The mean follow-up duration was 5.9 years (range 1-10.4). We evaluated radiographic union and complications after index operation.

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated radiographic bone union at an average follow-up duration of 4.4 months (range 3-8). Two patients showed stem subsidence after revision THA and one patient demonstrated a subsequent peri-implant fracture around the distal end of plate after union of the initial PPF; one patient underwent re-revision THA for stem loosening while another patient went through refixation for the peri-implant fracture. There was no nonunion, infection, nerve injury, or dislocation.

CONCLUSION

The inner-side-out LC-DCP technique showed satisfactory radiographic outcome. In certain situations where locking plates are not available, this technique might be a useful alternative for treating type B and C PFFs.

摘要

背景

用于治疗B型和C型人工关节周围股骨骨折(PFFs)的钢板固定最佳技术尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估内侧向外有限接触动力加压钢板(LC-DCP)在全髋关节置换术(THA)期间或之后治疗PFFs的影像学结果。

方法

这项回顾性研究包括4名男性和6名女性,平均年龄64.7岁,他们接受了内侧向外LC-DCP技术切开复位内固定治疗PFFs;使用塑形钢板和缆线初步维持复位,LC-DCP下表面的有限接触凹槽用于在收紧缆线时固定并防止缆线滑动。THA术后有5例术中PFFs和5例术后PFFs。根据温哥华分类,术中PFFs包括2例B2型、1例B3型和2例C3型,而术后PFFs分为1例B1型、2例B2型和2例C型。平均随访时间为5.9年(范围1 - 10.4年)。我们评估了初次手术后的影像学骨愈合情况及并发症。

结果

所有患者在平均4.4个月(范围3 - 8个月)的随访时均显示影像学骨愈合。2例患者在翻修THA后出现假体柄下沉,1例患者在初始PFF愈合后钢板远端周围出现假体周围骨折;1例患者因假体柄松动接受再次翻修THA,另1例患者因假体周围骨折接受再次固定。没有出现骨不连、感染、神经损伤或脱位。

结论

内侧向外LC-DCP技术显示出令人满意的影像学结果。在某些无法获得锁定钢板的情况下,该技术可能是治疗B型和C型PFFs的有用替代方法。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of the Inner-Side-Out Use of the LC-DCP for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Jul 30;54(6):879-884. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00200-9. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
[Plate osteosynthesis in vancouver type b1 and b2 periprosthetic fractures].
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):410-6.
7
Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Arthroplasty Vancouver Type B.
Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Sep;56(3):536-543. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.03.21.
10
Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: An algorithm of treatment.
Injury. 2019 Jul;50 Suppl 2:S45-S51. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.044. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical treatment of peri-prosthetic femur fractures with dedicated NCB plates: our experience.
Acta Biomed. 2020 May 11;91(2):297-304. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i2.8608.
3
Off-Label Use in Orthopaedic Surgery.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Sep 1;27(17):e767-e774. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00038.
4
Re-fractures after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A difficult to treat growing evidence.
Injury. 2018 Nov;49 Suppl 3:S43-S47. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.045.
5
Evolution of fracture treatment with bone plates.
Injury. 2018 Jun;49 Suppl 1:S2-S7. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30294-8.
6
Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty.
Hip Pelvis. 2018 Jun;30(2):78-85. doi: 10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.78. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
8
Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty.
Hip Pelvis. 2015 Sep;27(3):146-51. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.146. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
9
Periprosthetic femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: systematic analysis of the effect of stem design.
Hip Int. 2017 Feb 21;27(1):26-34. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000413. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验