Rossell-Perry Percy, Olivencia-Flores Claudia, Delgado-Jimenez Maria Pia, Ormeño-Aquino Ruben
Post Graduate Studies School of Medicine, San Martin de Porres University.
Department of Surgery, Plastic Surgery Service, Edgardo Rebagliatti Hospital, Lima, Peru.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e3082. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003082. eCollection 2020 Sep.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome after using primary surgery to address bilateral cleft lip nose and palate deformities. In addition, the authors performed a systematic review to evaluate the effects of the nasoalveolar molding on non-syndromic bilateral cleft lip and palate.
A prospective cohort study on a surgeon's surgical outcome of 25 consecutively performed primary bilateral cleft lip nasal deformity repairs was conducted and a systematic review of the literature for studies published until December 2019 was done to evaluate the effect of presurgical NAM on nasolabial aesthetics and alveolar gap.
Since 2014, 25 consecutive patients with complete bilateral cleft have undergone primary anatomical repair of the cleft nasal deformity using primary cheilorhinoplasty. The average columella length was 4.3 ± 1.3 mm. The average ratio of the columella height to nasal height was 0.48 mm 1 year postoperatively and 0.52 mm 5 years postoperatively. Statistically significant differences have been observed between the pre and postoperative alveolar and palatal gaps after using primary cheiloplasty or bilateral lip adhesion. After systematic literature searching, 14 identified studies were qualified for the final analysis, which included 433 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE scale was low.
The results of this study suggest that the proposed primary cheilorhinoplasty is a good alternative to improve nose appearance and alveolar gap in patients with primary bilateral cleft lip nose and palate deformity. Based on the available scientific evidence, definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of presurgical Naso Alveolar Molding on nasolabial aesthetics cannot be drawn. Quality of the included articles were too low to make a conclusion.
本研究旨在评估采用一期手术治疗双侧唇腭裂鼻畸形的手术效果。此外,作者进行了一项系统评价,以评估鼻牙槽塑形对非综合征性双侧唇腭裂的影响。
对一名外科医生连续进行的25例双侧唇裂鼻畸形一期修复手术的手术效果进行了前瞻性队列研究,并对截至2019年12月发表的研究进行了文献系统评价,以评估术前鼻牙槽塑形对鼻唇美学和牙槽间隙的影响。
自2014年以来,25例双侧完全性唇裂患者采用一期唇鼻整形术对唇裂鼻畸形进行了一期解剖修复。平均鼻小柱长度为4.3±1.3毫米。术后1年鼻小柱高度与鼻高度的平均比值为0.48毫米,术后5年为0.52毫米。采用一期唇裂修复术或双侧唇粘连术后,术前和术后牙槽及腭部间隙存在统计学显著差异。经过系统的文献检索,确定有14项研究符合最终分析标准,共纳入433例患者。根据牛津循证医学中心和GRADE量表,总体研究质量较低。
本研究结果表明,所提出的一期唇鼻整形术是改善双侧唇腭裂鼻畸形患者鼻外观和牙槽间隙的一种良好替代方法。基于现有的科学证据,无法就术前鼻牙槽塑形对鼻唇美学的有效性得出明确结论。纳入文章的质量过低,无法得出结论。