• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳鼻喉科学的研究质量与学术影响力相关吗?

Does quality of research in otolaryngology correlate with academic impact?

作者信息

Kazi Aasif A, Vahidi Nima A, Sinkovich John, Coelho Daniel H

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond Virginia USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Aug 11;5(5):819-823. doi: 10.1002/lio2.444. eCollection 2020 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/lio2.444
PMID:33134528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7585250/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the quality of otolaryngology-related journal articles correlates with traditional measures of article impact.

METHODS

All articles published by Laryngoscope in 2011 were categorized according to level of evidence (LOE) according to the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine rubric. Articles without a level of evidence assigned were alphabetically subcategorized type with letters A-D corresponding to Contemporary Reports, Case Reports, Basic Science or Animal Studies, and Other respectively. Citations per article were then recorded per article each year from 2012 to 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 494 articles were included for analysis, 315 had numerical LOE and 179 had alphabetical LOE. There was a strong negative correlation between numerical LOE and median and interquartile number of citations ( = -.9014, = .037). Overall, numerical LOE had a significantly higher median number of citations per article compared with the non-number/alphabetical group (14 vs 6,  < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher quality research as determined by level of evidence is in fact being cited more frequently than lower quality articles. Although the scope of this study was relatively limited, these data suggest that better designed studies may exhibit greater impact by traditional measures. Such findings should serve as an impetus for (and validation of) continued pursuit of high LOE research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

摘要

目的

确定耳鼻喉科相关期刊文章的质量是否与文章影响力的传统衡量指标相关。

方法

根据牛津循证医学中心的标准,将《喉镜》2011年发表的所有文章按证据水平(LOE)进行分类。未指定证据水平的文章按字母顺序分为A - D类,分别对应当代报告、病例报告、基础科学或动物研究以及其他。然后记录每篇文章在2012年至2018年每年的被引次数。

结果

共纳入494篇文章进行分析,315篇有数字形式的LOE,179篇有字母形式的LOE。数字形式的LOE与被引次数的中位数和四分位数间距之间存在很强的负相关性( = -0.9014, = 0.037)。总体而言,与非数字/字母组相比,数字形式的LOE每篇文章的被引次数中位数显著更高(14对6, < 0.001)。

结论

事实上,由证据水平确定的高质量研究比低质量文章被引用得更频繁。尽管本研究的范围相对有限,但这些数据表明,设计更好的研究可能在传统衡量指标上表现出更大的影响力。这些发现应为持续开展高LOE研究提供动力(并验证其合理性)。

证据水平

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/7585250/5c72513652a3/LIO2-5-819-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/7585250/ebc05da59b39/LIO2-5-819-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/7585250/5c72513652a3/LIO2-5-819-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/7585250/ebc05da59b39/LIO2-5-819-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/354b/7585250/5c72513652a3/LIO2-5-819-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Does quality of research in otolaryngology correlate with academic impact?耳鼻喉科学的研究质量与学术影响力相关吗?
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Aug 11;5(5):819-823. doi: 10.1002/lio2.444. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Assessment of Characteristics and Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Platelet-Rich Plasma in Musculoskeletal Medicine.肌肉骨骼医学中关于富血小板血浆的50篇被引用次数最多的文章的特征及方法学质量评估
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 May 26;10(5):23259671221093074. doi: 10.1177/23259671221093074. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Association between article citation rate and level of evidence in the companion animal literature.伴侣动物文献中文章引文率与证据水平的关系。
J Vet Intern Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):252-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.00869.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
4
Patellar Tendon Injury: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most-Cited Articles Demonstrates Relatively High Overall Level of Evidence.髌腱损伤:对被引用次数最多的文章进行的文献计量分析表明证据总体水平相对较高。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 20;4(5):e1747-e1757. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.06.022. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Assessment and Trends of the Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Patellar Instability.髌股关节不稳领域被引用次数最多的50篇文章的方法学质量评估及趋势
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 29;9(1):2325967120972016. doi: 10.1177/2325967120972016. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Articles on Achilles Tendon Injury.跟腱损伤领域被引用次数最多的50篇文章分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 May 19;11(5):23259671231170846. doi: 10.1177/23259671231170846. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Predictors of Citations in Neurosurgical Research: A 5-Year Follow-Up.神经外科研究的引文预测:5 年随访。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Sep;153:e66-e75. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.029. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
8
Ten-Year Trends in Level of Evidence in Hand Surgery.手部外科的证据水平十年趋势。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jan;19(1):163-168. doi: 10.1177/15589447221093672. Epub 2022 May 13.
9
An analysis of references used for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: what are their levels of evidence and journal impact factors?骨科住院医师培训考试所使用参考文献的分析:其证据水平和期刊影响因子如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):4024-32. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3895-0. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
10
Is the Number of Citations Related to the Study Methodology in Shoulder Arthroplasty Literature? A Bibliometric and Statistical Analysis of Current Evidence.肩部置换术文献中与研究方法相关的引用次数情况如何?当前证据的文献计量学与统计学分析
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2024 Jan 5;8:24715492231223346. doi: 10.1177/24715492231223346. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of Otology and Neurotology Research in Otolaryngology Journals.耳科学和神经耳科学研究在耳鼻喉科期刊中的质量。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Sep;41(8):1021-1026. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002731.
2
Correlation Between Quality of Evidence and Number of Citations in Top 50 Cited Articles in Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery.肩袖修复手术中引用率最高的50篇文章的证据质量与引用次数之间的相关性
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 12;6(6):2325967118776635. doi: 10.1177/2325967118776635. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
Are methodological quality and completeness of reporting associated with citation-based measures of publication impact? A secondary analysis of a systematic review of dementia biomarker studies.
方法学质量和报告的完整性与基于引文的出版影响衡量指标相关吗?对痴呆生物标志物研究的系统评价的二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 22;8(3):e020331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020331.
4
Publication trends and levels of evidence in obstructive sleep apnea literature.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停文献中的发表趋势及证据水平
Laryngoscope. 2018 Sep;128(9):2193-2199. doi: 10.1002/lary.27075. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
Newsworthiness vs scientific impact: are the most highly cited urology papers the most widely disseminated in the media?新闻价值与科学影响力:被引用次数最多的泌尿外科论文在媒体上的传播范围最广吗?
BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):441-454. doi: 10.1111/bju.13881. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Research trends in evidence-based medicine: a joinpoint regression analysis of more than 50 years of publication data.循证医学研究趋势:对 50 多年发表数据的联合回归分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0121054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121054. eCollection 2015.
7
Evidence based medicine - new approaches and challenges.循证医学——新方法与挑战。
Acta Inform Med. 2008;16(4):219-25. doi: 10.5455/aim.2008.16.219-225.
8
Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others.精神病学领域具有统计学显著性的论文比其他论文被引用的频率更高。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;60(9):939-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.014. Epub 2007 May 4.
9
Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery.口腔颌面外科领域的证据水平与期刊影响因子
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;36(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
10
The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency.研究质量与被引频次之间的关系。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Sep 1;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-42.