Suppr超能文献

创伤止血粉治疗急诊科非创伤性鼻出血的随机临床试验

Traumastem Powder in Treatment of Non-Traumatic Anterior Epistaxis in Emergency Department; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Pouraghaei Mahboob, Shafiee Sina, Mesrian Fahimeh, Ebrahimi Bakhtavar Haniyeh, Rahmani Farzad

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 4;8(1):e78. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Various studies are being conducted because of the value of finding an appropriate medication to control bleeding in patients with epistaxis faster and more conveniently. This study aimed to compare the effect of Traumastem powder with routine tampons in treatment of non-traumatic epistaxis.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with epistaxis presenting to the emergency departments of two hospitals affiliated to Tabriz University of Medical sciences. Patients were divided into two groups using randomization software (intervention group: 107 patients, control group: 96 patients). Primary outcome variables included bleeding control time and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcome variable was recurrence of bleeding within the first 24 hours after treatment. Visual assessment scoring system was used to assess patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Epistaxis was controlled in less than 5 minutes in 85 (79.4%) patients in the intervention group and 85 (88.5%) patients in the control group (P=0.058). Patient satisfaction in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). In the intervention group, 10 patients experienced recurrence of epistaxis within 24 hours of treatment, while 9 patients in the control group experienced recurrence (P= 0.591).

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings, bleeding control time was similar in the two groups, but patient satisfaction was higher in Traumastem group. It is concluded that Traumastem can conveniently control anterior epistaxis, but it is not successful in cases with severe bleeding.

摘要

引言

由于找到一种合适的药物来更快、更方便地控制鼻出血患者的出血具有重要价值,因此正在进行各种研究。本研究旨在比较创伤止血粉与常规棉塞治疗非创伤性鼻出血的效果。

方法

这项随机临床试验纳入了大不里士医科大学附属两家医院急诊科的鼻出血患者。使用随机软件将患者分为两组(干预组:107例患者,对照组:96例患者)。主要结局变量包括出血控制时间和患者满意度。次要结局变量是治疗后24小时内出血复发情况。采用视觉评估评分系统评估患者满意度。

结果

干预组85例(79.4%)患者和对照组85例(88.5%)患者的鼻出血在5分钟内得到控制(P=0.058)。干预组患者满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组有10例患者在治疗后24小时内鼻出血复发,而对照组有9例患者复发(P=0.591)。

结论

根据研究结果,两组的出血控制时间相似,但创伤止血粉组患者满意度更高。得出的结论是,创伤止血粉可以方便地控制前位鼻出血,但在严重出血的情况下并不成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab06/7588002/381cb205821a/aaem-8-e78-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验