• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤止血粉治疗急诊科非创伤性鼻出血的随机临床试验

Traumastem Powder in Treatment of Non-Traumatic Anterior Epistaxis in Emergency Department; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Pouraghaei Mahboob, Shafiee Sina, Mesrian Fahimeh, Ebrahimi Bakhtavar Haniyeh, Rahmani Farzad

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 4;8(1):e78. eCollection 2020.

PMID:33134974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588002/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Various studies are being conducted because of the value of finding an appropriate medication to control bleeding in patients with epistaxis faster and more conveniently. This study aimed to compare the effect of Traumastem powder with routine tampons in treatment of non-traumatic epistaxis.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with epistaxis presenting to the emergency departments of two hospitals affiliated to Tabriz University of Medical sciences. Patients were divided into two groups using randomization software (intervention group: 107 patients, control group: 96 patients). Primary outcome variables included bleeding control time and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcome variable was recurrence of bleeding within the first 24 hours after treatment. Visual assessment scoring system was used to assess patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Epistaxis was controlled in less than 5 minutes in 85 (79.4%) patients in the intervention group and 85 (88.5%) patients in the control group (P=0.058). Patient satisfaction in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). In the intervention group, 10 patients experienced recurrence of epistaxis within 24 hours of treatment, while 9 patients in the control group experienced recurrence (P= 0.591).

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings, bleeding control time was similar in the two groups, but patient satisfaction was higher in Traumastem group. It is concluded that Traumastem can conveniently control anterior epistaxis, but it is not successful in cases with severe bleeding.

摘要

引言

由于找到一种合适的药物来更快、更方便地控制鼻出血患者的出血具有重要价值,因此正在进行各种研究。本研究旨在比较创伤止血粉与常规棉塞治疗非创伤性鼻出血的效果。

方法

这项随机临床试验纳入了大不里士医科大学附属两家医院急诊科的鼻出血患者。使用随机软件将患者分为两组(干预组:107例患者,对照组:96例患者)。主要结局变量包括出血控制时间和患者满意度。次要结局变量是治疗后24小时内出血复发情况。采用视觉评估评分系统评估患者满意度。

结果

干预组85例(79.4%)患者和对照组85例(88.5%)患者的鼻出血在5分钟内得到控制(P=0.058)。干预组患者满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组有10例患者在治疗后24小时内鼻出血复发,而对照组有9例患者复发(P=0.591)。

结论

根据研究结果,两组的出血控制时间相似,但创伤止血粉组患者满意度更高。得出的结论是,创伤止血粉可以方便地控制前位鼻出血,但在严重出血的情况下并不成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab06/7588002/97f807a1b528/aaem-8-e78-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab06/7588002/381cb205821a/aaem-8-e78-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab06/7588002/97f807a1b528/aaem-8-e78-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab06/7588002/381cb205821a/aaem-8-e78-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab06/7588002/97f807a1b528/aaem-8-e78-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Traumastem Powder in Treatment of Non-Traumatic Anterior Epistaxis in Emergency Department; a Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤止血粉治疗急诊科非创伤性鼻出血的随机临床试验
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 4;8(1):e78. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinical Practice Guideline: Nosebleed (Epistaxis).临床实践指南:鼻出血(鼻衄)。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jan;162(1_suppl):S1-S38. doi: 10.1177/0194599819890327.
3
Clinical Practice Guideline: Nosebleed (Epistaxis) Executive Summary.临床实践指南:鼻出血(鼻衄)执行摘要。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jan;162(1):8-25. doi: 10.1177/0194599819889955.
4
Topical Tranexamic Acid Compared With Anterior Nasal Packing for Treatment of Epistaxis in Patients Taking Antiplatelet Drugs: Randomized Controlled Trial.局部使用氨甲环酸与前鼻孔填塞治疗服用抗血小板药物的鼻出血患者的比较:随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):261-266. doi: 10.1111/acem.13345. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Topical tranexamic acid for the treatment of epistaxis in patients using antiplatelet agents.外用氨甲环酸治疗使用抗血小板药物患者的鼻出血
CJEM. 2018 Sep;20(5):774-776. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.422.
6
A new and rapid method for epistaxis treatment using injectable form of tranexamic acid topically: a randomized controlled trial.一种新的快速治疗鼻出血的方法:局部应用氨甲环酸注射剂型:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;31(9):1389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
7
Comparison of nasal tampons for the treatment of epistaxis in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.急诊科用于治疗鼻出血的鼻用棉塞比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.002.
8
Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a novel matrix hemostatic sealant in patients with acute anterior epistaxis.新型基质止血密封剂治疗急性前鼻出血患者的前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验
Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000160528.50017.3C.
9
Posterior epistaxis: clinical features and acute complications.后鼻孔出血:临床特征与急性并发症
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):592-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70169-9.
10
Improving efficiency in epistaxis transfers in a large health system: Analyzing emergency department treatment variability as pretext for a clinical care pathway.提高大型医疗体系中鼻出血转科效率:以急诊处理变异性为分析前提,构建临床护理路径。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul-Aug;40(4):530-535. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Trends in the Application of Cellulose-Based Hemostatic and Wound Healing Dressings.基于纤维素的止血和伤口愈合敷料应用的最新趋势
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 23;16(5):151. doi: 10.3390/jfb16050151.

本文引用的文献

1
Awareness about first aid management of epistaxis among medical students in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国医科学生对鼻出血急救处理的认知情况。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Mar;8(3):914-918. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_15_19.
2
Management of Persistent Epistaxis Using Floseal Hemostatic Matrix vs. traditional nasal packing: a prospective randomized control trial.使用纤维蛋白封闭剂与传统鼻腔填塞治疗持续性鼻出血的管理:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jan 8;47(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0248-5.
3
An in vivo comparison of the efficacy of hemostatic powders, using two porcine bleeding models.
使用两种猪出血模型对止血粉疗效进行的体内比较。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Nov 30;10:273-279. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S140663. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparison of Local Sclerotherapy With Lauromacrogol Versus Nasal Packing in the Treatment of Anterior Epistaxis.聚桂醇局部硬化疗法与鼻腔填塞治疗前位鼻出血的比较
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jun;9(2):131-5. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2015.00416. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
An outcomes analysis of anterior epistaxis management in the emergency department.急诊科前鼻出血处理的结果分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Apr 11;45:24. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0138-2.
6
Comparison of outcomes between endoscopic surgery and conventional nasal packing for epistaxis in the posterior fornix of the inferior nasal meatus.鼻内镜手术与传统鼻腔填塞治疗鼻道后穹窿鼻出血的疗效比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Nov-Dec;31(6):1361-5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.316.8340.
7
An In Vivo Comparison of Hemostatic Gelatin Matrix Products in a Porcine Spleen Biopsy-punch Model.猪脾脏活检穿刺模型中止血明胶基质产品的体内比较
Surg Technol Int. 2015 Nov;27:53-7.
8
Comparison of hemostatic dressings for superficial wounds using a new spectrophotometric coagulation assay.使用新型分光光度法凝血检测对浅表伤口止血敷料的比较
J Transl Med. 2015 Nov 30;13:375. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0740-5.
9
Variation in hospital resource use and cost among surgical procedures using topical absorbable hemostats.使用局部可吸收止血剂的外科手术中医院资源使用和成本的差异。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Nov 6;7:567-74. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S88698. eCollection 2015.
10
Relationship between epistaxis and hypertension: A cause and effect or coincidence?鼻出血与高血压之间的关系:因果关系还是巧合?
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015 Apr;27(2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 16.