• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《听力损失简易国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的实施:临床耳科学和听力学实践中基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的电子录入工具》

Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice.

作者信息

van Leeuwen Lisette M, Pronk Marieke, Merkus Paul, Goverts S Theo, Terwee Caroline B, Kramer Sophia E

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1533-1544. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000867.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000867
PMID:33136629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7722460/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), functioning reflects the interplay between an individual's body structures and functions, activities, participation, environmental, and personal factors. To be useful in clinical practice, these concepts need to be operationalized into a practical and integral instrument. The Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss (CSHL) provides a minimum standard for the assessment of functioning in adults with hearing loss. The objective of the present study was to operationalize the Brief CSHL into a digital intake tool that could be used in the otology-audiology practice for adults with ear and hearing problems as part of their intake assessment.

DESIGN

A three-step approach was followed: (1) Selecting and formulating questionnaire items and response formats, using the 27 categories of the Brief CSHL as a basis. Additional categories were selected based on relevant literature and clinical expertise. Items were selected from existing, commonly used disease-specific questionnaires, generic questionnaires, or the WHO's official descriptions of ICF categories. The response format was based on the existing item's response categories or on the ICF qualifiers. (2) Carrying out an expert survey and a pilot study (using the three-step test interview. Relevant stakeholders and patients were asked to comment on the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the items. Results were discussed in the project group, and items were modified based on consensus. (3) Integration of the intake tool into a computer-based system for use in clinical routine.

RESULTS

The Brief CSHL was operationalized into 62 items, clustered into six domains: (1) general information, including reason for visit, sociodemographic, and medical background; (2) general body functions; (3) ear and hearing structures and functions; (4) activities and participation (A&P); (5) environmental factors (EF); and (6) personal factors (mastery and coping). Based on stakeholders' responses, the instructions of the items on A&P and EF were adapted. The three-step test interview showed that the tool had sufficient content validity but that some items on EF were redundant. Overall, the stakeholders and patients indicated that the intake tool was relevant and had a logical and clear structure. The tool was integrated in an online portal.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, an ICF-based e-intake tool was developed that aims to screen self-reported functioning problems in adults with an ear/hearing problem. The relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the originally proposed item list was supported, although the stakeholder and patient feedback resulted into some changes of the tool on item-level. Ultimately, the functioning information obtained with the tool could be used to promote patient-centered ear and hearing care taking a biopsychosocial perspective into account.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/7722460/3c995359b115/aud-41-1533-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/7722460/602aa97f75a5/aud-41-1533-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/7722460/3c995359b115/aud-41-1533-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/7722460/602aa97f75a5/aud-41-1533-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ee3/7722460/3c995359b115/aud-41-1533-g002.jpg
摘要

目的

根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF),功能反映了个体的身体结构与功能、活动、参与、环境及个人因素之间的相互作用。为在临床实践中发挥作用,这些概念需要转化为实用且完整的工具。《听力损失简要ICF核心集》(CSHL)为评估听力损失成人的功能提供了最低标准。本研究的目的是将简要CSHL转化为一种数字录入工具,可用于耳科 - 听力学诊所,作为患有耳部和听力问题的成人患者录入评估的一部分。

设计

采用了三步法:(1)以简要CSHL的27个类别为基础,选择并制定问卷项目及回答格式。根据相关文献和临床专业知识选择其他类别。项目选自现有的、常用的特定疾病问卷、通用问卷或世界卫生组织对ICF类别的官方描述。回答格式基于现有项目的回答类别或ICF限定词。(2)进行专家调查和预试验(采用三步测试访谈法)。邀请相关利益相关者和患者对项目的相关性、全面性和可理解性发表意见。在项目组中讨论结果,并根据共识修改项目。(3)将录入工具集成到基于计算机的系统中,以便在临床常规中使用。

结果

简要CSHL被转化为62个项目,分为六个领域:(1)一般信息,包括就诊原因、社会人口统计学和医疗背景;(2)一般身体功能;(3)耳部和听力结构与功能;(4)活动与参与(A&P);(5)环境因素(EF);(6)个人因素(掌控和应对)。根据利益相关者的反馈,对A&P和EF项目的说明进行了调整。三步测试访谈表明该工具具有足够的内容效度,但EF部分的一些项目存在冗余。总体而言,利益相关者和患者表示该录入工具相关且结构合理、清晰。该工具已集成到在线门户中。

结论

在本研究中,开发了一种基于ICF的电子录入工具,旨在筛查患有耳部/听力问题的成人自我报告的功能问题。尽管利益相关者和患者的反馈导致该工具在项目层面发生了一些变化,但最初提出的项目列表的相关性、全面性和可理解性得到了支持。最终,通过该工具获得的功能信息可用于促进以患者为中心的耳部和听力护理,同时考虑生物心理社会因素。

相似文献

1
Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice.《听力损失简易国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的实施:临床耳科学和听力学实践中基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的电子录入工具》
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1533-1544. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000867.
2
Overlap and Nonoverlap Between the ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otology and Audiology Intake Documentation.听力损失的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心集与耳科学及听力学接诊记录之间的重叠与非重叠情况。
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):103-116. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000358.
3
Comparing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otorhinolaryngology/Audiology Intake Documentation at Mayo Clinic.比较国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组在梅奥诊所听力损失和耳鼻喉科/听力学入院记录中的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):858-869. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000662.
4
The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: Multinational experts' and patients' perspectives.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类自评问卷(HEAR-COMMAND工具)的开发,用于评估听力、沟通和对话障碍:多国专家和患者的观点。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Nov 14;3:1005525. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1005525. eCollection 2022.
5
Conformities and gaps of clinical audiological data with the international classification of functioning disability and health core sets for hearing loss.临床听力学数据与国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组听力损失的一致性和差距。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Jun;62(6):552-561. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2078433. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
6
Functional performance in older adults with hearing loss: Application of the International Classification of Functioning brief core set for hearing loss: A pilot study.听力损失老年人的功能表现:听力损失国际功能分类简要核心集的应用:一项试点研究。
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(9):579-86. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1023903. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
7
The ICF core sets for hearing loss project: International expert survey on functioning and disability of adults with hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF).听力损失的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心集项目:使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)对成年听力损失患者的功能和残疾情况进行的国际专家调查。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Aug;53(8):497-506. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.900196. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Developing an intervention to implement an ICF-based e-intake tool in clinical otology and audiology practice.开发一项干预措施,以在临床耳科学和听力学实践中实施基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的电子入门工具。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Apr;59(4):282-300. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1691746. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
The selection of core International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) categories for patient-reported outcome measurement in spine trauma patients-results of an international consensus process.用于脊柱创伤患者自我报告结局测量的核心国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)类别的选择——一项国际共识过程的结果
Spine J. 2016 Aug;16(8):962-70. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.03.050. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
10
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Field Testing of the Korean Version of the HEAR-COMMAND Tool: A Self-Rated ICF-Based Questionnaire for Assessing Hearing, Communication, and Conversation Disabilities in Korean-Speaking Populations.HEAR-COMMAND工具韩语版的翻译、文化调适及现场测试:一份基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)自评的问卷,用于评估韩语使用者的听力、沟通及交流障碍
J Audiol Otol. 2025 Jul;29(3):197-204. doi: 10.7874/jao.2025.00136. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
2
ICF-based hearing and functioning assessment: validation and research outcomes of utilizing the HEAR-COMMAND tool for patients with mild to moderately severe hearing loss and individuals with normal hearing.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的听力与功能评估:针对轻度至中度重度听力损失患者及听力正常个体使用HEAR-COMMAND工具的验证及研究结果
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Aug 26;5:1389653. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1389653. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Developing an intervention to implement an ICF-based e-intake tool in clinical otology and audiology practice.开发一项干预措施,以在临床耳科学和听力学实践中实施基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的电子入门工具。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Apr;59(4):282-300. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1691746. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
2
Barriers to and enablers of the implementation of an ICF-based intake tool in clinical otology and audiology practice-A qualitative pre-implementation study.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的纳入工具在临床耳科学和听力学实践中的实施障碍和促进因素:一项定性预实施研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 11;13(12):e0208797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208797. eCollection 2018.
3
Validating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Sets for Autism in a Sample of Australian School-Aged Children on the Spectrum.在澳大利亚学龄自闭症谱系儿童样本中验证《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》自闭症核心集。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Apr;55(4):1424-1437. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06295-5. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
4
The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: Multinational experts' and patients' perspectives.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类自评问卷(HEAR-COMMAND工具)的开发,用于评估听力、沟通和对话障碍:多国专家和患者的观点。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Nov 14;3:1005525. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1005525. eCollection 2022.
5
An Evaluation of the Overall Utility of Measures of Functioning Suitable for School-Aged Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Scoping Review.评估适用于自闭症谱系儿童的功能测量工具的总体效用:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114114.
6
Integrating a New Dietetic Care Process in a Health Information System: A System and Process Analysis and Assessment.将新的饮食护理流程整合到健康信息系统中:系统和流程分析与评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(5):2491. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052491.
7
Experienced hearing aid users' perspectives of assessment and communication within audiology: a qualitative study using digital methods.有经验的助听器用户对听力学评估和交流的看法:使用数字方法的定性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Nov;61(11):956-964. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1998839. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Comparing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otorhinolaryngology/Audiology Intake Documentation at Mayo Clinic.
比较国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组在梅奥诊所听力损失和耳鼻喉科/听力学入院记录中的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):858-869. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000662.
4
Development of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire (SPaRQ) through consultation with adults with hearing loss, researchers, and clinicians: a content evaluation study.通过与听力损失成年人、研究人员和临床医生协商制定社会参与限制问卷(SPaRQ):一项内容评估研究。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Oct;57(10):791-799. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1483585. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
5
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
6
A Data-Driven Synthesis of Research Evidence for Domains of Hearing Loss, as Reported by Adults With Hearing Loss and Their Communication Partners.基于听力损失成年人及其交流伙伴报告的研究证据的领域的数据分析综合。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517734088. doi: 10.1177/2331216517734088.
7
The Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam: a generic patient reported outcome measure about the severity and impact of ear complaints. A cross-sectional study on the development of this questionnaire.阿姆斯特丹耳科学问卷:一份关于耳部不适严重程度和影响的通用患者报告结局指标。关于该问卷编制的横断面研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):240-248. doi: 10.1111/coa.12950. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Coping together with hearing loss: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the psychosocial experiences of people with hearing loss and their communication partners.共同应对听力损失:对听力损失者及其沟通伙伴心理社会经历的质性元分析
Int J Audiol. 2017 May;56(5):297-305. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1286695. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
Optimizing health system response to patient's needs: an argument for the importance of functioning information.优化卫生系统对患者需求的响应:关于有效信息重要性的论证
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Sep;40(19):2325-2330. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1334234. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
10
Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 3: patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management.《患者报告结局(PROs)使用系列的蒙特利尔协定》- 论文3:患者报告结局可促进共同决策并指导自我管理。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 20.