• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组在梅奥诊所听力损失和耳鼻喉科/听力学入院记录中的应用。

Comparing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otorhinolaryngology/Audiology Intake Documentation at Mayo Clinic.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

These authors contributed equally to this work.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):858-869. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000662.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000662
PMID:30289788
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Hearing Loss (CSHL) consists of short lists of categories from the entire ICF classification that are thought to be the most relevant for describing the functioning of persons with hearing loss. A comprehensive intake that covers all factors included in the ICF CSHL holds the promise of developing a tailored treatment plan that fully complements the patient's needs. The Comprehensive CSHL contains 117 categories and serves as a guide for multiprofessional, comprehensive assessment. The Brief CSHL includes 27 of the 117 categories and represents the minimal spectrum of functioning of persons with HL for single-discipline encounters or clinical trials. The authors first sought to benchmark the extent to which Audiologist (AUD) and Otorhinolaryngologist (ORL) discipline-specific intake documentation, as well as Mayo Clinic's multidisciplinary intake documentation, captures ICF CSHL categories.

DESIGN

A retrospective study design including 168 patient records from the Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Audiology of Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Anonymized intake documentation forms and reports were selected from patient records filed between January 2016 and May 2017. Data were extracted from the intake documentation forms and reports and linked to ICF categories using pre-established linking rules. "Overlap," defined as the percentage of ICF CSHL categories represented in the intake documentation, was calculated across document types. In addition, extra non-ICF CSHL categories (ICF categories that are not part of the CSHL) and extra constructs (constructs that are not part of the ICF classification) found in the patient records were described.

RESULTS

The total overlap of multidisciplinary intake documentation with ICF CSHL categories was 100% for the Brief CSHL and 50% for the Comprehensive CSHL. Brief CSHL overlap for discipline-specific documentation fell short at 70% for both AUD and ORL. Important extra non-ICF CSHL categories were identified and included "sleep function" and "motor-related functions and activities," which mostly were reported in relation to tinnitus and vestibular disorders.

CONCLUSION

The multidisciplinary intake documentation of Mayo Clinic showed 100% overlap with the Brief CSHL, while important areas of nonoverlap were identified in AUD- and ORL-specific reports. The ICF CSHL provides a framework for describing each hearing-impaired individual's unique capabilities and needs in ways currently not documented by audiological and otological evaluations, potentially setting the stage for more effective individualized patient care. Efforts to further validate the ICF CSHL may require the involvement of multidisciplinary institutions with commonly shared electronic health records to adequately capture the breath of the ICF CSHL.

摘要

目的

国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)听力损失核心集(CSHL)由整个 ICF 分类中认为最能描述听力损失患者功能的简短类别列表组成。全面的评估涵盖了 ICF CSHL 中包含的所有因素,有望制定出完全符合患者需求的个性化治疗计划。综合 CSHL 包含 117 个类别,是多专业综合评估的指南。简要 CSHL 包含 117 个类别的 27 个类别,代表了单学科接触或临床试验中听力损失患者的最低功能谱。作者首先寻求基准,以确定听力学(AUD)和耳鼻喉科(ORL)专科的特定摄入文档以及梅奥诊所的多学科摄入文档在多大程度上捕获了 ICF CSHL 类别。

设计

回顾性研究设计,包括佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔梅奥诊所耳鼻喉科/听力学系的 168 名患者记录。从 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 5 月期间归档的患者记录中选择匿名的摄入文档表格和报告。从摄入文档表格和报告中提取数据,并使用预先建立的链接规则将其链接到 ICF 类别。通过计算文档类型之间的“重叠”(定义为代表 ICF CSHL 类别的百分比)来衡量重叠度。此外,还描述了患者记录中发现的额外非 ICF CSHL 类别(不属于 CSHL 的 ICF 类别)和额外结构(不属于 ICF 分类的结构)。

结果

多学科摄入文档与 ICF CSHL 类别的总重叠率为简要 CSHL 的 100%,全面 CSHL 的 50%。AUD 和 ORL 的专科文档的简要 CSHL 重叠率均低于 70%。确定了重要的额外非 ICF CSHL 类别,包括“睡眠功能”和“与运动相关的功能和活动”,这些类别主要与耳鸣和前庭障碍有关。

结论

梅奥诊所的多学科摄入文档与简要 CSHL 完全重叠,而在 AUD 和 ORL 特定报告中发现了重要的非重叠领域。ICF CSHL 提供了一个框架,用于以目前未通过听力学和耳科学评估记录的方式描述每个听力受损个体的独特能力和需求,这可能为更有效的个体化患者护理奠定基础。为进一步验证 ICF CSHL 可能需要多学科机构的参与,这些机构具有共同的共享电子健康记录,以充分捕捉 ICF CSHL 的广度。

相似文献

1
Comparing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otorhinolaryngology/Audiology Intake Documentation at Mayo Clinic.比较国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组在梅奥诊所听力损失和耳鼻喉科/听力学入院记录中的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):858-869. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000662.
2
Overlap and Nonoverlap Between the ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss and Otology and Audiology Intake Documentation.听力损失的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心集与耳科学及听力学接诊记录之间的重叠与非重叠情况。
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):103-116. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000358.
3
Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice.《听力损失简易国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的实施:临床耳科学和听力学实践中基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的电子录入工具》
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1533-1544. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000867.
4
Conformities and gaps of clinical audiological data with the international classification of functioning disability and health core sets for hearing loss.临床听力学数据与国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组听力损失的一致性和差距。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Jun;62(6):552-561. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2078433. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
5
The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss: researcher perspective, Part II: Linking outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心组合用于听力损失:研究人员视角,第二部分:将结果测量指标与 ICF 相联系。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Feb;53(2):77-87. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.858279. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
6
Functional performance in older adults with hearing loss: Application of the International Classification of Functioning brief core set for hearing loss: A pilot study.听力损失老年人的功能表现:听力损失国际功能分类简要核心集的应用:一项试点研究。
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(9):579-86. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1023903. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
7
The ICF core sets for hearing loss project: International expert survey on functioning and disability of adults with hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF).听力损失的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心集项目:使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)对成年听力损失患者的功能和残疾情况进行的国际专家调查。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Aug;53(8):497-506. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.900196. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: Multinational experts' and patients' perspectives.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类自评问卷(HEAR-COMMAND工具)的开发,用于评估听力、沟通和对话障碍:多国专家和患者的观点。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Nov 14;3:1005525. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1005525. eCollection 2022.
9
The creation of a comprehensive and a brief core set for hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.利用国际功能、残疾和健康分类法制定一套全面的和一套简要的听力损失核心指标集。
Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec;22(2):323-8. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0052).
10
Safety of audiology direct access for medicare patients complaining of impaired hearing.医疗保险患者听力受损投诉的听力检查直接就诊安全性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jun;21(6):365-79. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.6.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in Saudi Arabia: Pathways to Early Diagnosis, Intervention, and National Policy.沙特阿拉伯听力障碍的患病率:早期诊断、干预及国家政策途径
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 11;13(16):1964. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161964.
2
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Field Testing of the Korean Version of the HEAR-COMMAND Tool: A Self-Rated ICF-Based Questionnaire for Assessing Hearing, Communication, and Conversation Disabilities in Korean-Speaking Populations.HEAR-COMMAND工具韩语版的翻译、文化调适及现场测试:一份基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)自评的问卷,用于评估韩语使用者的听力、沟通及交流障碍
J Audiol Otol. 2025 Jul;29(3):197-204. doi: 10.7874/jao.2025.00136. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
3
ICF-based hearing and functioning assessment: validation and research outcomes of utilizing the HEAR-COMMAND tool for patients with mild to moderately severe hearing loss and individuals with normal hearing.
基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的听力与功能评估:针对轻度至中度重度听力损失患者及听力正常个体使用HEAR-COMMAND工具的验证及研究结果
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Aug 26;5:1389653. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1389653. eCollection 2024.
4
The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: Multinational experts' and patients' perspectives.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类自评问卷(HEAR-COMMAND工具)的开发,用于评估听力、沟通和对话障碍:多国专家和患者的观点。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Nov 14;3:1005525. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1005525. eCollection 2022.
5
Enhancing Person-Centered Audiologic Rehabilitation: Exploring the Use of an Interview Tool Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss.加强以患者为中心的听力康复:探索基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》听力损失核心集的访谈工具的应用。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 13;3:945464. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.945464. eCollection 2022.
6
Conceptual Model of Hearing Health Inequalities (HHI Model): A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.听力健康不平等概念模型(HHI 模型):批判性综合分析。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211002963. doi: 10.1177/23312165211002963.
7
Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice.《听力损失简易国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的实施:临床耳科学和听力学实践中基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的电子录入工具》
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1533-1544. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000867.
8
The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It.《听觉科学中的生态有效性探索:是什么、为什么重要以及如何推进》。
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):5S-19S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000944.