Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行对心血管门诊医疗模式的影响。

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2021 Jan;231:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.074. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought about abrupt changes in the way health care is delivered, and the impact of transitioning outpatient clinic visits to telehealth visits on processes of care and outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated ordering patterns during cardiovascular telehealth clinic visits in the Duke University Health System between March 15 and June 30, 2020 and 30-day outcomes compared with in-person visits in the same time frame in 2020 and in 2019.

RESULTS

Within the Duke University Health System, there was a 33.1% decrease in the number of outpatient cardiovascular visits conducted in the first 15 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with the same time period in 2019. As a proportion of total visits initially booked, 53% of visits were cancelled in 2020 compared to 35% in 2019. However, patients with cancelled visits had similar demographics and comorbidities in 2019 and 2020. Telehealth visits comprised 9.3% of total visits initially booked in 2020, with younger and healthier patients utilizing telehealth compared with those utilizing in-person visits. Compared with in-person visits in 2020, telehealth visits were associated with fewer new (31.6% for telehealth vs 44.6% for in person) or refill (12.9% vs 15.6%, respectively) medication prescriptions, electrocardiograms (4.3% vs 31.4%), laboratory orders (5.9% vs 21.8%), echocardiograms (7.3% vs 98%), and stress tests (4.4% vs 6.6%). When adjusted for age, race, and insurance status, those who had a telehealth visit or cancelled their visit were less likely to have an emergency department or hospital encounter within 30 days compared with those who had in-person visits (adjusted rate ratios (aRR) 0.76 [95% 0.65, 0.89] and aRR 0.71 [95% 0.65, 0.78], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In response to the perceived risks of routine medical care affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, different phenotypes of patients chose different types of outpatient cardiology care. A better understanding of these differences could help define necessary and appropriate mode of care for cardiology patients.

摘要

背景

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行带来了医疗服务方式的急剧变化,将门诊就诊转为远程医疗就诊对护理过程和结果的影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们评估了 2020 年 3 月 15 日至 6 月 30 日期间在杜克大学健康系统进行的心血管远程医疗诊所就诊期间的医嘱模式,并与 2020 年和 2019 年同期的门诊就诊进行了 30 天的结局比较。

结果

在 COVID-19 大流行的前 15 周内,与 2019 年同期相比,杜克大学健康系统的门诊心血管就诊数量减少了 33.1%。作为最初预约就诊的比例,2020 年取消的就诊比例为 53%,而 2019 年为 35%。然而,2019 年和 2020 年取消就诊的患者具有相似的人口统计学特征和合并症。远程医疗就诊占 2020 年最初预约就诊的 9.3%,与接受门诊就诊的患者相比,年轻且健康的患者更倾向于使用远程医疗就诊。与 2020 年的门诊就诊相比,远程医疗就诊的新处方(远程医疗就诊 31.6%,门诊就诊 44.6%)和(远程医疗就诊 12.9%,门诊就诊 15.6%)的药物、心电图(远程医疗就诊 4.3%,门诊就诊 31.4%)、实验室检查(远程医疗就诊 5.9%,门诊就诊 21.8%)、超声心动图(远程医疗就诊 7.3%,门诊就诊 98%)和压力测试(远程医疗就诊 4.4%,门诊就诊 6.6%)更少。在校正年龄、种族和保险状况后,与接受门诊就诊的患者相比,接受远程医疗就诊或取消就诊的患者在 30 天内发生急诊或住院的可能性更低(校正后的比值比(aRR)0.76 [95%置信区间(CI)0.65,0.89]和 aRR 0.71 [95%CI 0.65,0.78])。

结论

为应对 COVID-19 大流行对常规医疗服务的感知风险,不同表型的患者选择了不同类型的门诊心脏病学治疗。更好地了解这些差异有助于确定心脏病患者必要和适当的护理模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec57/7604084/09922863f4a8/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验