• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噬菌体Sb-1在抗生素中的辅助使用增强了对利福平耐药菌株的生物膜生长抑制活性。

Adjunctive Use of Phage Sb-1 in Antibiotics Enhances Inhibitory Biofilm Growth Activity versus Rifampin-Resistant Strains.

作者信息

Wang Lei, Tkhilaishvili Tamta, Trampuz Andrej

机构信息

Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;9(11):749. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110749.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics9110749
PMID:33138034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7692760/
Abstract

Effective antimicrobials are crucial for managing implant-associated bone infections (IABIs), particularly for infections due to rifampin-resistant (RRSA). Failure to remove the implant results in persistent infection; thus, prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy may be a reasonable alternative. However, a high incidence of adverse events can necessitate the discontinuation of therapy. In this scenario, commercial bacteriophage Sb-1 combined with antibiotics is an option, showing a promising synergistic activity to facilitate the treatment of biofilm infections. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of the inhibitory activity of five antibiotics (doxycycline, levofloxacin, clindamycin, linezolid, and rifampin) alone or combined with phage Sb-1 (10 PFU/mL) in a simultaneous and staggered manner, to combat five clinical RRSA strains and the laboratory strain MRSA ATCC 43300 in 72 h by isothermal microcalorimetry. The synergistic effects were observed when phage Sb-1 (10 PFU/mL) combined with antibiotics had at least 2 log-reduction lower concentrations, represented by a fractional biofilm inhibitory concentration (FBIC) of <0.25. Among the antibiotics that we tested, the synergistic effect of all six strains was achieved in phage/doxycycline and phage/linezolid combinations in a staggered manner, whereas a distinctly noticeable improvement in inhibitory activity was observed in the phage/doxycycline combination with a low concentration of doxycycline. Moreover, phage/levofloxacin and phage/clindamycin combinations also showed a synergistic inhibitory effect against five strains and four strains, respectively. Interestingly, the synergistic inhibitory activity was also observed in the doxycycline-resistant and levofloxacin-resistant profile strains. However, no inhibitory activity was observed for all of the combinations in a simultaneous manner, as well as for the phage/rifampin combination in a staggered manner. These results have implications for alternative, combined, and prolonged suppressive antimicrobial treatment approaches.

摘要

有效的抗菌药物对于治疗植入物相关骨感染(IABIs)至关重要,尤其是对于耐利福平(RRSA)引起的感染。未能取出植入物会导致感染持续存在;因此,延长抑制性抗生素治疗可能是一种合理的替代方法。然而,不良事件的高发生率可能需要停止治疗。在这种情况下,商业噬菌体Sb-1与抗生素联合使用是一种选择,显示出有前景的协同活性,有助于治疗生物膜感染。因此,我们通过等温微量热法评估了五种抗生素(强力霉素、左氧氟沙星、克林霉素、利奈唑胺和利福平)单独或与噬菌体Sb-1(10 PFU/mL)同时及交错联合使用对五种临床RRSA菌株和实验室菌株MRSA ATCC 43300在72小时内的抑制活性效果。当噬菌体Sb-1(10 PFU/mL)与抗生素联合使用时,若浓度至少降低2个对数,以生物膜抑制浓度分数(FBIC)<0.25表示,则观察到协同效应。在我们测试的抗生素中,噬菌体/强力霉素和噬菌体/利奈唑胺组合以交错方式对所有六种菌株均实现了协同效应,而在低浓度强力霉素的噬菌体/强力霉素组合中观察到抑制活性有明显显著的提高。此外,噬菌体/左氧氟沙星和噬菌体/克林霉素组合分别对五种菌株和四种菌株也显示出协同抑制作用。有趣的是,在耐强力霉素和耐左氧氟沙星的菌株中也观察到了协同抑制活性。然而,同时联合使用的所有组合以及交错联合使用的噬菌体/利福平组合均未观察到抑制活性。这些结果对替代、联合和延长抑制性抗菌治疗方法具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/7692760/fb89e0b3bb9a/antibiotics-09-00749-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/7692760/5758841147dc/antibiotics-09-00749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/7692760/ed864a2ce6a9/antibiotics-09-00749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/7692760/fb89e0b3bb9a/antibiotics-09-00749-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/7692760/5758841147dc/antibiotics-09-00749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/7692760/ed864a2ce6a9/antibiotics-09-00749-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/7692760/fb89e0b3bb9a/antibiotics-09-00749-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Adjunctive Use of Phage Sb-1 in Antibiotics Enhances Inhibitory Biofilm Growth Activity versus Rifampin-Resistant Strains.噬菌体Sb-1在抗生素中的辅助使用增强了对利福平耐药菌株的生物膜生长抑制活性。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;9(11):749. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110749.
2
Evaluation of Staphylococcal Bacteriophage Sb-1 as an Adjunctive Agent to Antibiotics Against Rifampin-Resistant Biofilms.评估葡萄球菌噬菌体Sb-1作为抗生素辅助剂对抗利福平耐药生物膜的效果。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 11;11:602057. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.602057. eCollection 2020.
3
Bacteriophage Sb-1 enhances antibiotic activity against biofilm, degrades exopolysaccharide matrix and targets persisters of Staphylococcus aureus.噬菌体 Sb-1 增强了抗生素对生物膜的活性,降解了胞外多糖基质,并靶向了金黄色葡萄球菌的持久性细菌。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Dec;52(6):842-853. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
[In vitro activity of linezolid, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, clindamycin and rifampin, alone and in combination, against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis].利奈唑胺、莫西沙星、左氧氟沙星、克林霉素和利福平单独及联合应用对金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌的体外活性
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2005 Jun;18(2):168-72.
5
Antibacterial Efficacy of Two Commercially Available Bacteriophage Formulations, Staphylococcal Bacteriophage and PYO Bacteriophage, Against Methicillin-Resistant : Prevention and Eradication of Biofilm Formation and Control of a Systemic Infection of Larvae.两种市售噬菌体制剂(葡萄球菌噬菌体和PYO噬菌体)对耐甲氧西林菌的抗菌效果:预防和根除生物膜形成以及控制幼虫的全身感染
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 7;11:110. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00110. eCollection 2020.
6
Does Treatment Order Matter? Investigating the Ability of Bacteriophage to Augment Antibiotic Activity against Biofilms.治疗顺序重要吗?探究噬菌体增强抗生素对生物膜活性的能力。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 5;9:127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00127. eCollection 2018.
7
Therapeutic potential of bacteriophages for staphylococcal infections and selected methods for in vitro susceptibility testing of staphylococci.噬菌体对葡萄球菌感染的治疗潜力及葡萄球菌体外药敏试验的选定方法
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2020 Winter;69(1):10-18.
8
Efficacy of Linezolid and Fosfomycin in Catheter-Related Biofilm Infection Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.利奈唑胺和磷霉素对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的导管相关生物膜感染的疗效
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6413982. doi: 10.1155/2016/6413982. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
9
In vitro activity of linezolid in combination with doxycycline, fosfomycin, levofloxacin, rifampicin and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.利奈唑胺联合多西环素、磷霉素、左氧氟沙星、利福平及万古霉素对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的体外活性
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2006 Sep;19(3):252-7.
10
Evaluation of linezolid or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in combination with rifampicin as alternative oral treatments based on an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of staphylococcal biofilm.基于金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜体外药效动力学模型评估利奈唑胺或复方磺胺甲噁唑联合利福平作为替代口服治疗的效果。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Jun;51(6):854-861. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Response of to combination of virulent bacteriophage vB_SauM-515A1 and linezolid.[未提及的对象]对烈性噬菌体vB_SauM - 515A1与利奈唑胺联合用药的反应。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Dec 20;15:1519312. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1519312. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploiting phage-antibiotic synergies to disrupt PAO1 biofilms in the context of orthopedic infections.利用噬菌体-抗生素协同作用破坏骨科感染背景下的 PAO1 生物膜。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jan 11;12(1):e0321923. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03219-23. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
"Two Is Better Than One": The Multifactorial Nature of Phage-Antibiotic Combinatorial Treatments Against ESKAPE-Induced Infections.

本文引用的文献

1
Bacteriophage-antibiotic combinations against ciprofloxacin/ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli in vitro and in an experimental Galleria mellonella model.体外和实验性大蜡螟模型中针对环丙沙星/头孢曲松耐药大肠杆菌的噬菌体-抗生素组合。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Dec;56(6):106200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106200. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Using Bacteriophages as a Trojan Horse to the Killing of Dual-Species Biofilm Formed by and Methicillin Resistant .利用噬菌体作为特洛伊木马杀死由[具体细菌名称1]和耐甲氧西林[具体细菌名称2]形成的双物种生物膜
Front Microbiol. 2020 Apr 15;11:695. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00695. eCollection 2020.
3
“两个比一个好”:噬菌体-抗生素联合治疗应对ESKAPE引发感染的多因素本质
Phage (New Rochelle). 2023 Jun 1;4(2):55-67. doi: 10.1089/phage.2023.0007. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
4
The SARS-CoV-2 Hydra, a tiny monster from the 21st century: Thermodynamics of the BA.5.2 and BF.7 variants.21世纪的小怪物——新冠病毒奥密克戎BA.5.2和BF.7变异株的热力学
Microb Risk Anal. 2023 Apr;23:100249. doi: 10.1016/j.mran.2023.100249. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
5
Biothermodynamics of Viruses from Absolute Zero (1950) to Virothermodynamics (2022).从绝对零度(1950 年)到病毒热动力学(2022 年)的病毒生物热力学
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 9;10(12):2112. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122112.
6
Phage-Antibiotic Therapy as a Promising Strategy to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Infections and to Enhance Antimicrobial Efficiency.噬菌体-抗生素疗法作为对抗多重耐药感染和提高抗菌效率的一种有前景的策略。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 25;11(5):570. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050570.
7
Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice.考虑在临床实践中使用噬菌体疗法。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Mar 15;66(3):e0207121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02071-21. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Development of Effective Antibacterial Treatment: Lessons from the Past and Novel Approaches.有效抗菌治疗的发展:过去的经验与新方法
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;10(3):230. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030230.
Antibacterial Efficacy of Two Commercially Available Bacteriophage Formulations, Staphylococcal Bacteriophage and PYO Bacteriophage, Against Methicillin-Resistant : Prevention and Eradication of Biofilm Formation and Control of a Systemic Infection of Larvae.
两种市售噬菌体制剂(葡萄球菌噬菌体和PYO噬菌体)对耐甲氧西林菌的抗菌效果:预防和根除生物膜形成以及控制幼虫的全身感染
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 7;11:110. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00110. eCollection 2020.
4
Isothermal microcalorimetry minimal inhibitory concentration testing in extensively drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli: a multicentre study.等温微量量热法检测广泛耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌的最小抑菌浓度:一项多中心研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct;26(10):1413.e1-1413.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.01.026. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
Evaluation of the Activity of a Combination of Three Bacteriophages Alone or in Association with Antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus Embedded in Biofilm or Internalized in Osteoblasts.评价三种噬菌体单独或联合抗生素对生物膜包埋或骨细胞内内化金黄色葡萄球菌的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Feb 21;64(3). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02231-19.
6
Synergistic Activity of Fosfomycin, Ciprofloxacin, and Gentamicin Against and Biofilms.磷霉素、环丙沙星和庆大霉素对[具体对象未给出]及生物被膜的协同活性。
Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 6;10:2522. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02522. eCollection 2019.
7
Phage-Antibiotic Combination Treatments: Antagonistic Impacts of Antibiotics on the Pharmacodynamics of Phage Therapy?噬菌体 - 抗生素联合治疗:抗生素对噬菌体治疗药效学的拮抗作用?
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Oct 11;8(4):182. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040182.
8
Evolution of resistance mechanisms and biological characteristics of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains selected in vitro.体外筛选的利福平耐药金黄色葡萄球菌耐药机制和生物学特性的演变。
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1573-9.
9
In vitro antimicrobial activity against Abiotrophia defectiva and Granulicatella elegans biofilms.对缺陷拟杆菌和优雅颗粒菌生物膜的体外抗菌活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Aug 1;74(8):2261-2268. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz174.
10
Benefits and Adverse Events Associated With Extended Antibiotic Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection.全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染中延长抗生素使用的益处及不良事件
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 3;70(4):559-565. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz261.