Wang Lei, Di Luca Mariagrazia, Tkhilaishvili Tamta, Trampuz Andrej, Gonzalez Moreno Mercedes
Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 6;10:2522. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02522. eCollection 2019.
Gram-negative (GN) rods cause about 10% periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and represent an increasing challenge due to emergence of antimicrobial resistance. and are among the most common cause of GN-PJI and ciprofloxacin is the first-line antibiotic. Due to emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance, we evaluated the activity of fosfomycin, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin, alone and in combinations, against and biofilms. Conventional microbiological tests and isothermal microcalorimetry were applied to investigate the anti-biofilm activity of the selected antibiotics against standard laboratory strains as well as clinical strains isolated from patients with prosthetic joint associated infections. The biofilm susceptibility to each antibiotic varied widely among strains, while fosfomycin presented a poor anti-biofilm activity against . Synergism of two-pair antibiotic combinations was observed against different clinical strains from both species. Highest synergism was found for the fosfomycin/gentamicin combination against the biofilm of strains (75%), including a gentamicin-resistant but fosfomycin-susceptible strain, whereas the gentamicin/ciprofloxacin combination presented synergism with higher frequency against the biofilm of strains (71.4%). A hypothetical bacteriolysis effect of gentamicin could explain why combinations with this antibiotic seem to be particularly effective. Still, the underlying mechanism of the synergistic effect on biofilms is unknown. In conclusion, combinatorial antibiotic application has shown to be more effective against biofilms compared to monotherapy. Further and clinical studies are essential to define the potential treatment regimen based on our results.
革兰氏阴性(GN)杆菌导致约10%的人工关节周围感染(PJI),并且由于抗菌药物耐药性的出现,其构成的挑战日益增加。[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]是GN-PJI最常见的病因,环丙沙星是一线抗生素。由于氟喹诺酮耐药性的出现,我们评估了磷霉素、环丙沙星和庆大霉素单独及联合使用对[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]生物膜的活性。应用传统微生物学检测和等温微量热法研究所选抗生素对标准实验室菌株以及从人工关节相关感染患者分离出的临床菌株的抗生物膜活性。各菌株对每种抗生素的生物膜敏感性差异很大,而磷霉素对[具体细菌名称1]的抗生物膜活性较差。观察到两对抗生素组合对来自这两种细菌的不同临床菌株具有协同作用。磷霉素/庆大霉素组合对[具体细菌名称1]菌株生物膜的协同作用最高(75%),包括一株对庆大霉素耐药但对磷霉素敏感的菌株,而庆大霉素/环丙沙星组合对[具体细菌名称2]菌株生物膜的协同作用频率更高(71.4%)。庆大霉素的一种假设性细菌溶解作用可以解释为什么与这种抗生素的组合似乎特别有效。然而,对生物膜协同作用的潜在机制尚不清楚。总之,与单一疗法相比,联合应用抗生素对生物膜更有效。进一步的[研究类型]和临床研究对于根据我们的结果确定潜在的治疗方案至关重要。