Pediatric Section 1, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Jul;26(3):e12317. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12317. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
This study is a qualitative interview study. The authors used the stimulated recall interview (SRI) with nurses working at a children's hospital in southern Sweden for the data collection. In total twelve nurses were interviewed and qualitative content analysis was used for the data analysis.
The results are presented as one theme: Need for higher competencies and evidence, and three categories: Routines can enable pain assessment, Trusting one's own assessment of the whole picture, and Pain assessment scales as an extra workload. The interviewed nurses acknowledged that pain assessment tools are a vital part of the field of pain treatment. They also had trust issues with measuring and estimating pain by means of a tool such as pain scale. Furthermore, their opinion was that too many different tools and methods add up towards a more blurry and stress-related environment and due to a lack of consistent routines, pain assessment is seen as a work-related burden in the daily routines.
Results from the present study indicated that nurses need clear routines in combination with continued education regarding pain assessment with pain scales, which might be the key to successful pediatric pain assessment and thus to better pain management within pediatrics.
本研究是一项定性访谈研究。作者在瑞典南部的一家儿童医院使用了护士的激发性回忆访谈(SRI)进行数据收集。共有 12 名护士接受了访谈,并采用定性内容分析法进行数据分析。
结果呈现为一个主题:需要更高的能力和证据,以及三个类别:常规可以实现疼痛评估、信任对整体情况的评估、疼痛评估量表作为额外的工作量。接受访谈的护士承认,疼痛评估工具是疼痛治疗领域的重要组成部分。他们在使用疼痛量表等工具测量和估计疼痛时也存在信任问题。此外,他们认为过多不同的工具和方法会增加模糊性和压力相关的环境,由于缺乏一致的常规,疼痛评估在日常工作中被视为一种工作相关的负担。
本研究结果表明,护士需要明确的常规,结合有关疼痛评估的继续教育,这可能是成功进行儿科疼痛评估的关键,从而更好地管理儿科疼痛。