Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, REMOSS Research Group, Universidade de Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain; CLINURSID Research Group, Nursing Department, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Santiago de Compostela's Health Research Institute (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
CLINURSID Research Group, Nursing Department, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Santiago de Compostela's Health Research Institute (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain; School of Nursing, REMOSS Research Group, Universidade de Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;38(10):2019-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.042. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
Lifeguard teams carry out their work in extremely hot conditions in many parts of the world. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of high temperatures on physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
A randomized quasi-experimental cross-over design was used to test physiological lifesaving demands (50 min acclimatization +10 min CPR) in two different thermal environments: Thermo-neutral environment (25 °C) vs Hyperthermic environment (37 °C).
The data obtained from 21 lifeguards were included, this covers a total of 420 min of resuscitation. The CPR performance was constantly maintained during the 10 min. The Oxygen uptake (VO 2) ranged from 17 to 18 ml/min/kg for chest compressions (CC) and between 13 and 14 ml/min/kg for ventilations (V) at both 25 °C and 37 °C, with no significant difference between environments (p > 0.05). The percentage of maximum heart rate (%HR max) increased between 7% and 8% at 37 °C (p < 0.001), ranging between 75% and 82% of HR max. The loss of body fluids (LBF) was higher in the hyperthermic environment; LBF: (37 °C: 400 ± 187 g vs 25 °C: 148 ± 81 g, p < 0.001). Body temperature was 1 °C higher at the end of the test (p < 0.001). The perceived fatigue (RPE) increased by 37° an average of 2 points on a scale of 10 (p = 0.001).
Extreme heat is not a limiting factor in CPR performance with two lifeguards. Metabolic consumption is sustained, with an increase in CC, so V can serve as active rest. Nevertheless, resuscitation at 37 °C results in a higher HR, is more exhausting and causes significant loss of fluids due to sweating.
救生员在世界许多地区的极端高温条件下开展工作。本研究旨在分析高温对心肺复苏(CPR)期间生理参数的影响。
采用随机准实验交叉设计,在两种不同的热环境中测试生理救生需求(50 分钟适应+10 分钟 CPR):热中性环境(25°C)与高温环境(37°C)。
纳入了 21 名救生员的数据,共涵盖 420 分钟的复苏。在 10 分钟内,CPR 性能始终保持不变。在 25°C 和 37°C 时,胸外按压(CC)的耗氧量(VO2)范围为 17 至 18ml/min/kg,通气(V)的耗氧量为 13 至 14ml/min/kg,两种环境之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。最大心率(%HR max)的百分比在 37°C 时增加了 7%至 8%(p<0.001),心率范围在 75%至 82%的 HR max 之间。高温环境中体液流失(LBF)更高;LBF:(37°C:400±187g 比 25°C:148±81g,p<0.001)。测试结束时体温升高 1°C(p<0.001)。感知疲劳(RPE)平均增加 37 度 2 点,评分为 10(p=0.001)。
两名救生员在极端高温下进行 CPR 时,高温不是限制因素。代谢消耗得以维持,CC 增加,因此 V 可作为主动休息。然而,37°C 时的复苏会导致更高的心率,更累人,并因出汗而导致大量液体流失。