Department of Psychology, University at Albany, Albany, New York, USA.
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(1):81-86. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1840589. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
This study employed taxometric procedures to replicate a previous report of the dimensional structure of problems related to cannabis consumption. Over 4,000 cannabis users completed an assessment of psychological, social, occupational, and physical harms (the Marijuana Problems Scale). Three taxometric procedures (MAMBAC, MAXEIG, and L-Mode) compared the current data to simulations with a base rate of problematic cannabis use derived from representative, large-scale data estimates. All three procedures confirmed the continuous, dimensional nature of these cannabis problems and suggested no underlying taxon or category. Psychopathological disorders, including some substance use problems, have fit categorical models suggesting that they differ in kind (rather than intensity) from the behavior of the rest of the population. Cannabis problems, however, appeared to lie along a continuum with other forms of use. Given heightened awareness for the necessity of replication and a changing legal landscape for cannabis, a second look at the dimensionality of these problems seemed warranted. New data with a larger sample and different indices of problematic use confirmed the dimensionality of cannabis problems. This replication can inform predictions about the etiology, prevention, and treatment of cannabis use disorder. Researchers should expect cannabis problems to range along a continuum without categorical distinctions. Dividing users into groups of problematic and non-problematic users likely sacrifices meaningful variance. Harm reduction strategies likely can benefit all users rather than a targeted taxon with troubles. In addition, interventions will likely progress by small, incremental steps rather than dramatic, categorical jumps in progress.
本研究采用分类程序复制了先前关于与大麻消费相关问题的维度结构的报告。 超过 4000 名大麻使用者完成了对心理、社会、职业和身体伤害的评估(大麻问题量表)。 三种分类程序(MAMBAC、MAXEIG 和 L-Mode)将当前数据与基于代表性大规模数据估计得出的问题性大麻使用的基本率的模拟进行了比较。 所有三种程序都证实了这些大麻问题的连续、维度性质,并且没有暗示潜在的分类群或类别。 心理病理障碍,包括一些物质使用问题,符合分类模型,表明它们在种类(而不是强度)上与人群的其余部分不同。 然而,大麻问题似乎沿着与其他使用形式的连续体存在。 鉴于对复制的必要性和大麻法律环境的变化的认识不断提高,对这些问题的维度性进行第二次审视似乎是合理的。 具有更大样本和不同问题使用指标的新数据证实了大麻问题的维度性。 这种复制可以为大麻使用障碍的病因、预防和治疗提供预测。 研究人员应该期望大麻问题沿着连续体存在,而没有分类区别。 将使用者分为有问题和无问题使用者的群组可能会牺牲有意义的差异。 减少伤害的策略可能会使所有使用者受益,而不是针对有问题的特定分类群。 此外,干预措施可能会逐步取得进展,而不是在进展中出现戏剧性的、分类的跳跃。