• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

僵局的智慧:共识和聚类作为提高集体准确性的过滤机制。

The wisdom of stalemates: consensus and clustering as filtering mechanisms for improving collective accuracy.

机构信息

Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany.

Max Planck Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 11;287(1938):20201802. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1802. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2020.1802
PMID:33143576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7735266/
Abstract

Groups of organisms, from bacteria to fish schools to human societies, depend on their ability to make accurate decisions in an uncertain world. Most models of collective decision-making assume that groups reach a consensus during a decision-making bout, often through simple majority rule. In many natural and sociological systems, however, groups may fail to reach consensus, resulting in stalemates. Here, we build on opinion dynamics and collective wisdom models to examine how stalemates may affect the wisdom of crowds. For simple environments, where individuals have access to independent sources of information, we find that stalemates improve collective accuracy by selectively filtering out incorrect decisions (an effect we call stalemate filtering). In complex environments, where individuals have access to both shared and independent information, this effect is even more pronounced, restoring the wisdom of crowds in regions of parameter space where large groups perform poorly when making decisions using majority rule. We identify network properties that tune the system between consensus and accuracy, providing mechanisms by which animals, or evolution, could dynamically adjust the collective decision-making process in response to the reward structure of the possible outcomes. Overall, these results highlight the adaptive potential of stalemate filtering for improving the decision-making abilities of group-living animals.

摘要

从细菌到鱼群再到人类社会,各种生物群体都依赖于它们在不确定的世界中做出准确决策的能力。大多数群体决策模型都假设群体在决策过程中达成共识,通常是通过简单的多数规则。然而,在许多自然和社会学系统中,群体可能无法达成共识,从而导致僵局。在这里,我们基于观点动态和集体智慧模型来研究僵局如何影响群体智慧。对于个体可以访问独立信息源的简单环境,我们发现僵局通过选择性地过滤掉错误决策来提高集体准确性(我们称之为僵局过滤)。在个体可以访问共享和独立信息的复杂环境中,这种效果更加明显,在使用多数规则做出决策时表现不佳的参数空间区域中恢复了群体智慧。我们确定了调节系统在共识和准确性之间的网络特性,提供了动物或进化可以根据可能结果的奖励结构动态调整集体决策过程的机制。总的来说,这些结果强调了僵局过滤在提高群居动物决策能力方面的自适应潜力。

相似文献

1
The wisdom of stalemates: consensus and clustering as filtering mechanisms for improving collective accuracy.僵局的智慧:共识和聚类作为提高集体准确性的过滤机制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 11;287(1938):20201802. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1802. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
2
Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.群体智慧与复杂信息整合下的生存情境中的集体决策。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 15;5(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00248-z.
3
Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes.在复杂环境中,决策的准确性通常通过小组规模的缩小来实现。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 23;281(1784):20133305. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3305. Print 2014 Jun 7.
4
Timing decisions as the next frontier for collective intelligence.时机决策:集体智慧的下一个前沿领域
Trends Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct;39(10):904-912. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
5
Integration of Social Information by Human Groups.人类群体对社会信息的整合。
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;7(3):469-93. doi: 10.1111/tops.12150. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
Fussy groups thwart the collective burden of choice: A theoretical study of house-hunting ants.挑剔的群体阻碍了集体选择的负担:对寻房蚂蚁的理论研究。
J Theor Biol. 2019 Dec 21;483:110000. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110000. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
7
Human Crowds as Social Networks: Collective Dynamics of Consensus and Polarization.人类群体作为社交网络:共识与极化的集体动态。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):522-537. doi: 10.1177/17456916231186406. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
8
Ants work harder during consensus decision-making in small groups.在小群体中进行共识决策时,蚂蚁会更加努力地工作。
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Sep 6;11(98):20140641. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0641.
9
Neural decoding of collective wisdom with multi-brain computing.多脑计算的群体智慧神经解码。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):94-108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
10
Flexible human collective wisdom.灵活的人类集体智慧。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1588-611. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000101. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Better and faster decisions by larger fish shoals in the wild.野外较大鱼群能做出更好更快的决策。
Sci Adv. 2025 Aug;11(31):eadt8600. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt8600. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity of reaction time to the magnitude of rewards reveals the cost-structure of time.反应时间对奖励幅度的敏感性揭示了时间的成本结构。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56392-0.
2
Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups.个体和集体对动物群体风险的编码。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 8;116(41):20556-20561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905585116. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Modular structure within groups causes information loss but can improve decision accuracy.分组内的模块结构会导致信息丢失,但可以提高决策准确性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 10;374(1774):20180378. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0378.
4
Quorums enable optimal pooling of independent judgements in biological systems.法定人数使生物系统中独立判断的最优组合成为可能。
Elife. 2019 Feb 13;8:e40368. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40368.
5
Evidence for the speed-value trade-off: human and monkey decision making is magnitude sensitive.速度-价值权衡的证据:人类和猴子的决策对量级敏感。
Decision (Wash D C ). 2018 Apr;5(2):129-142. doi: 10.1037/dec0000075. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
Counteracting estimation bias and social influence to improve the wisdom of crowds.对抗估计偏差和社会影响,以提高群体智慧。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Apr;15(141). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0130.
7
Identifying influential neighbors in animal flocking.识别动物群体中的有影响力的邻居。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Nov 21;13(11):e1005822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005822. eCollection 2017 Nov.
8
How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups.社会信息如何提高人类群体中的估计准确性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 21;114(47):12620-12625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703695114. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making.双重编码理论解释了神经决策中的双相集体计算。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 6;11:313. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00313. eCollection 2017.
10
Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds.群体智慧中社会影响的网络动力学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 27;114(26):E5070-E5076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615978114. Epub 2017 Jun 12.