• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会信息如何提高人类群体中的估计准确性。

How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS, Université de Toulouse (Paul Sabatier), 31062 Toulouse, France.

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, 31062 Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 21;114(47):12620-12625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703695114. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1703695114
PMID:29118142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5703270/
Abstract

In our digital and connected societies, the development of social networks, online shopping, and reputation systems raises the questions of how individuals use social information and how it affects their decisions. We report experiments performed in France and Japan, in which subjects could update their estimates after having received information from other subjects. We measure and model the impact of this social information at individual and collective scales. We observe and justify that, when individuals have little prior knowledge about a quantity, the distribution of the logarithm of their estimates is close to a Cauchy distribution. We find that social influence helps the group improve its properly defined collective accuracy. We quantify the improvement of the group estimation when additional controlled and reliable information is provided, unbeknownst to the subjects. We show that subjects' sensitivity to social influence permits us to define five robust behavioral traits and increases with the difference between personal and group estimates. We then use our data to build and calibrate a model of collective estimation to analyze the impact on the group performance of the quantity and quality of information received by individuals. The model quantitatively reproduces the distributions of estimates and the improvement of collective performance and accuracy observed in our experiments. Finally, our model predicts that providing a moderate amount of incorrect information to individuals can counterbalance the human cognitive bias to systematically underestimate quantities and thereby improve collective performance.

摘要

在我们的数字和互联社会中,社交网络、在线购物和声誉系统的发展提出了这样的问题:个人如何使用社交信息,以及它如何影响他们的决策。我们报告了在法国和日本进行的实验,在这些实验中,被试可以在收到其他被试的信息后更新他们的估计。我们在个体和集体层面上测量和建模这种社会信息的影响。我们观察并证明,当个体对某个数量的先验知识很少时,他们估计值的对数分布接近柯西分布。我们发现,社会影响有助于提高群体的适当定义的集体准确性。我们量化了当向被试提供未知的额外受控和可靠信息时,群体估计的改进。我们表明,被试对社会影响的敏感性使我们能够定义五个稳健的行为特征,并且随着个人和群体估计之间的差异而增加。然后,我们使用我们的数据构建和校准了一个集体估计模型,以分析个体收到的信息量和质量对群体绩效的影响。该模型定量地再现了我们实验中观察到的估计分布和集体绩效的提高。最后,我们的模型预测,向个体提供适量的错误信息可以抵消人类系统地低估数量的认知偏差,从而提高集体绩效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/7d404e506ee8/pnas.1703695114fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/c145658f9bec/pnas.1703695114fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/932134d25ba2/pnas.1703695114fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/a472493062a1/pnas.1703695114fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/7d404e506ee8/pnas.1703695114fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/c145658f9bec/pnas.1703695114fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/932134d25ba2/pnas.1703695114fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/a472493062a1/pnas.1703695114fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5703270/7d404e506ee8/pnas.1703695114fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups.社会信息如何提高人类群体中的估计准确性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 21;114(47):12620-12625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703695114. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
2
Counteracting estimation bias and social influence to improve the wisdom of crowds.对抗估计偏差和社会影响,以提高群体智慧。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Apr;15(141). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0130.
3
The impact of incorrect social information on collective wisdom in human groups.错误的社会信息对人类群体中集体智慧的影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Sep;17(170):20200496. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0496. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Impact of sharing full versus averaged social information on social influence and estimation accuracy.分享完整与平均社交信息对社交影响和估计准确性的影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Jul;18(180):20210231. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0231. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
5
Conformist social learning leads to self-organised prevention against adverse bias in risky decision making.从众的社会学习导致了自我组织的预防措施,以避免在风险决策中出现不利偏见。
Elife. 2022 May 10;11:e75308. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75308.
6
Improving Collective Estimations Using Resistance to Social Influence.利用对社会影响的抵抗力改进集体估计。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 13;11(11):e1004594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004594. eCollection 2015 Nov.
7
The wisdom of stalemates: consensus and clustering as filtering mechanisms for improving collective accuracy.僵局的智慧:共识和聚类作为提高集体准确性的过滤机制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 11;287(1938):20201802. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1802. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Integration of Social Information by Human Groups.人类群体对社会信息的整合。
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;7(3):469-93. doi: 10.1111/tops.12150. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social information.群体控制:通过分享有偏差的社会信息来减少个体估计偏差。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Nov 29;17(11):e1009590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009590. eCollection 2021 Nov.
10
Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.群体智慧与复杂信息整合下的生存情境中的集体决策。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 15;5(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00248-z.

引用本文的文献

1
An ensemble method utilising multiple thinking styles that boosts the wisdom-of inner- crowd effect.一种利用多种思维方式的集成方法,可增强群体内部智慧效应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 21;15(1):30727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14740-3.
2
Mixing individual and collective behaviors to predict out-of-routine mobility.结合个体行为与集体行为以预测非常规出行。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 29;122(17):e2414848122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2414848122. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
3
Modeling dependent group judgments: A computational model of sequential collaboration.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling Influence and Opinion Evolution in Online Collective Behaviour.在线集体行为中的影响与观点演变建模
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0157685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157685. eCollection 2016.
2
Soft Regulation with Crowd Recommendation: Coordinating Self-Interested Agents in Sociotechnical Systems under Imperfect Information.具有群体推荐的软监管:在信息不完美的社会技术系统中协调自利主体
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150343. eCollection 2016.
3
Improving Collective Estimations Using Resistance to Social Influence.
对依赖群体判断进行建模:一种顺序协作的计算模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1142-1164. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02619-9. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
4
Elicitation and aggregation of multimodal estimates improve wisdom of crowd effects on ordering tasks.多模态估计的引出和聚合可改善群体智慧对排序任务的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):2640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52176-3.
5
Earlier social information has a stronger influence on judgments. 先前的社会信息对判断的影响更大。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50345-4.
6
Incentivizing free riders improves collective intelligence in social dilemmas.激励搭便车者可提高社会困境中的集体智慧。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 14;120(46):e2311497120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311497120. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Resampling reduces bias amplification in experimental social networks.重采样可减少实验社交网络中的偏差放大。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2084-2098. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01715-5. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
Cooperation and deception through stigmergic interactions in human groups.人类群体中通过连锁式互动进行的合作与欺骗。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 17;120(42):e2307880120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307880120. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
9
Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?多数原则:我们在汇总趋同意见方面表现如何?
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 May 31;1:e6. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.6. eCollection 2019.
10
Three Challenges for AI-Assisted Decision-Making.人工智能辅助决策面临的三大挑战
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Sep;19(5):722-734. doi: 10.1177/17456916231181102. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
利用对社会影响的抵抗力改进集体估计。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 13;11(11):e1004594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004594. eCollection 2015 Nov.
4
Opinion Formation by Social Influence: From Experiments to Modeling.社会影响下的观点形成:从实验到建模
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0140406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140406. eCollection 2015.
5
Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation.社会影响与意见形成的集体动态。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 5;8(11):e78433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078433. eCollection 2013.
6
Globally networked risks and how to respond.全球网络风险及其应对。
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):51-9. doi: 10.1038/nature12047.
7
Quantifying the effects of social influence.量化社会影响的效果。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1360. doi: 10.1038/srep01360.
8
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization.一项涉及 6100 万人的社会影响和政治动员实验。
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):295-8. doi: 10.1038/nature11421.
9
Is the true 'wisdom of the crowd' to copy successful individuals?众人的真正“智慧”是否在于复制成功人士?
Biol Lett. 2012 Apr 23;8(2):197-200. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0795. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
10
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect.社会影响如何破坏群体智慧效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 31;108(22):9020-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008636108. Epub 2011 May 16.