Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy, University of Hawai'i at Hilo, Hilo, Hawai'i, USA.
Parasitology. 2021 Feb;148(2):251-258. doi: 10.1017/S0031182020002139. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a parasitic nematode known to infect humans through the ingestion of third stage larvae which can cause inflammation and damage to the central nervous system. Currently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the most reliable diagnostic methods for detecting A. cantonensis in humans as well as in gastropod hosts, but requires expensive and specialized equipment. Here, we compare the sensitivity and accuracy of a recombinase polymerase amplification Exo (RPA-EXO) assay, and a recombinase polymerase amplification lateral flow assay (RPA-LFA) with a traditional quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay currently available. The three assays were used to test 35 slugs from Hawai'i for the presence of A. cantonensis DNA. Consistent results among the three tests were shown in 23/35 samples (65.7%), while 7/35 (20%) were discordant in low infection level samples (<0.01 larvae per mg tissue), and 5/35 (14.3%) were equivocal. To evaluate sensitivity, a partial ITS1 gene was cloned, and serial plasmid dilutions were created ranging from 100 copies μL-1 to ~1 copy μL-1. All three assays consistently detected 50-100 copies μL-1 in triplicate and qPCR was able to detect ~13 copies μL-1 in triplicate. RPA-EXO was able to detect 25 copies μL-1 in triplicate and RPA-LFA was not able to amplify consistently below 50 copies μL-1. Thus, our RPA-EXO and RPA-LFA assays do not appear as sensitive as the current qPCR assay at low DNA concentrations; however, these tests have numerous advantages that may make them useful alternatives to qPCR.
广州管圆线虫是一种寄生线虫,已知通过摄入第三期幼虫感染人类,可引起中枢神经系统的炎症和损伤。目前,聚合酶链反应(PCR)是检测人类和腹足纲宿主中广州管圆线虫的最可靠诊断方法之一,但需要昂贵和专业的设备。在这里,我们比较了重组酶聚合酶扩增外切酶(RPA-EXO)检测法和重组酶聚合酶扩增侧流检测法(RPA-LFA)与目前可用的传统定量 PCR(qPCR)检测法的灵敏度和准确性。使用这三种检测方法对来自夏威夷的 35 只蛞蝓进行检测,以确定是否存在广州管圆线虫 DNA。三种检测方法在 23/35 个样本(65.7%)中显示出一致的结果,而在低感染水平样本(<0.01 条幼虫/毫克组织)中,有 7/35(20%)的样本存在不一致,5/35(14.3%)的样本存在可疑结果。为了评估灵敏度,我们克隆了部分 ITS1 基因,并创建了从 100 拷贝 μL-1 到1 拷贝 μL-1的系列质粒稀释液。三种检测方法均能在三次重复中一致地检测到 50-100 拷贝 μL-1,而 qPCR 则能够在三次重复中检测到13 拷贝 μL-1。RPA-EXO 能够在三次重复中检测到 25 拷贝 μL-1,而 RPA-LFA 则不能在低于 50 拷贝 μL-1 的情况下持续扩增。因此,我们的 RPA-EXO 和 RPA-LFA 检测方法在低 DNA 浓度下似乎不如目前的 qPCR 检测方法灵敏;然而,这些测试具有许多优势,可能使它们成为 qPCR 的有用替代方法。