Suppr超能文献

阶段 2 注册报告:微妙的语言线索如何防止不道德行为。

Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors.

机构信息

Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2020 Aug 18;9:996. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25573.2. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Differences in descriptions can influence people's evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers' unethical behavior. The present study tried to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context (Experiment 1); additionally, we explored the influence of unfamiliar Japanese instruction words that captured participants' attention (Experiment 2). In two online experiments, participants were asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of "heads" results, which would indicate the amount of money that they could earn. In Experiment 1, we analyzed the difference in the number of "heads" results as reported by 768 participants under three conditions with different instructions ("Don't cheat" vs. "Don't be a cheater" vs. baseline as a control). In Experiment 2, we conducted an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention was directed toward the text. In Experiment 1, we successfully replicated the results of the original experiment. The results of Experiment 2 showed no evidence that the results in Experiment 1 were influenced by attentional factors. In conclusion, the results of the present study supported the hypothesis that self-identity-related words of moral reminder curb unethical behaviors more effectively. Stage 1 report: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20183.4.

摘要

描述上的差异会影响人们的评价和行为。Bryan 及其同事的先前研究表明,道德提醒中微妙的语言差异可以有区别地防止读者做出不道德的行为。本研究试图在日本背景下复制先前的发现(实验 1);此外,我们还探讨了不熟悉的日语指令词对参与者注意力的影响(实验 2)。在两项在线实验中,要求参与者进行 10 次掷硬币,并报告“正面”结果的数量,这将表明他们可以赚取的金额。在实验 1 中,我们分析了在三种不同指令条件下(“不要作弊”与“不要成为骗子”与作为对照的基线),768 名参与者报告的“正面”结果数量的差异。在实验 2 中,我们进行了一项扩展实验,其中包含了一项额外的任务,更多地关注文本。实验 1 成功复制了原始实验的结果。实验 2 的结果没有表明实验 1 的结果受到注意力因素的影响。总之,本研究的结果支持了这样的假设,即与自我认同相关的道德提醒词更有效地遏制不道德行为。第一阶段报告:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20183.4.

相似文献

6
Cheating at the end to avoid regret.作弊以避免后悔。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):395-414. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000026. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Justifications shape ethical blind spots.理由形成道德盲点。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):794-804. doi: 10.1177/0956797615571018. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Unethical amnesia responds more to instrumental than to hedonic motives.不道德遗忘对工具性动机的反应比对享乐性动机的反应更强烈。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25423-25428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011291117. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验