• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阶段 2 注册报告:微妙的语言线索如何防止不道德行为。

Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors.

机构信息

Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2020 Aug 18;9:996. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25573.2. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.25573.2
PMID:33145010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7590892/
Abstract

Differences in descriptions can influence people's evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers' unethical behavior. The present study tried to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context (Experiment 1); additionally, we explored the influence of unfamiliar Japanese instruction words that captured participants' attention (Experiment 2). In two online experiments, participants were asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of "heads" results, which would indicate the amount of money that they could earn. In Experiment 1, we analyzed the difference in the number of "heads" results as reported by 768 participants under three conditions with different instructions ("Don't cheat" vs. "Don't be a cheater" vs. baseline as a control). In Experiment 2, we conducted an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention was directed toward the text. In Experiment 1, we successfully replicated the results of the original experiment. The results of Experiment 2 showed no evidence that the results in Experiment 1 were influenced by attentional factors. In conclusion, the results of the present study supported the hypothesis that self-identity-related words of moral reminder curb unethical behaviors more effectively. Stage 1 report: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20183.4.

摘要

描述上的差异会影响人们的评价和行为。Bryan 及其同事的先前研究表明,道德提醒中微妙的语言差异可以有区别地防止读者做出不道德的行为。本研究试图在日本背景下复制先前的发现(实验 1);此外,我们还探讨了不熟悉的日语指令词对参与者注意力的影响(实验 2)。在两项在线实验中,要求参与者进行 10 次掷硬币,并报告“正面”结果的数量,这将表明他们可以赚取的金额。在实验 1 中,我们分析了在三种不同指令条件下(“不要作弊”与“不要成为骗子”与作为对照的基线),768 名参与者报告的“正面”结果数量的差异。在实验 2 中,我们进行了一项扩展实验,其中包含了一项额外的任务,更多地关注文本。实验 1 成功复制了原始实验的结果。实验 2 的结果没有表明实验 1 的结果受到注意力因素的影响。总之,本研究的结果支持了这样的假设,即与自我认同相关的道德提醒词更有效地遏制不道德行为。第一阶段报告:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20183.4.

相似文献

1
Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors.阶段 2 注册报告:微妙的语言线索如何防止不道德行为。
F1000Res. 2020 Aug 18;9:996. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25573.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors.第一阶段注册报告:微妙的语言线索如何防止不道德行为。
F1000Res. 2019 Aug 22;8:1482. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20183.4. eCollection 2019.
3
When cheating would make you a cheater: implicating the self prevents unethical behavior.当作弊会使你成为作弊者时:牵连自我可防止不道德行为。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1001-5. doi: 10.1037/a0030655. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
4
Depletion, moral identity, and unethical behavior: Why people behave unethically after self-control exertion.自我损耗、道德认同与不道德行为:为何人们在自我控制努力后会做出不道德行为。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Nov;56:188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: how unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules.掩盖不端行为:不道德行为如何导致道德规则被遗忘。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1164-77. doi: 10.1037/a0028381.
6
Cheating at the end to avoid regret.作弊以避免后悔。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):395-414. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000026. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
7
Lucky, Competent, or Just a Cheat? Interactive Effects of Honesty-Humility and Moral Cues on Cheating Behavior.幸运、有能力还是只是欺骗?诚实-谦逊与道德线索对欺骗行为的交互影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;44(2):158-172. doi: 10.1177/0146167217733071. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
The cheater's high: the unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior.作弊者的快感:不道德行为带来的意外情感收益。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Oct;105(4):531-48. doi: 10.1037/a0034231. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
9
Justifications shape ethical blind spots.理由形成道德盲点。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):794-804. doi: 10.1177/0956797615571018. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Unethical amnesia responds more to instrumental than to hedonic motives.不道德遗忘对工具性动机的反应比对享乐性动机的反应更强烈。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25423-25428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011291117. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Darkness promotes dishonesty in a coin toss task: A pre-registered conceptual replication of Experiment 1 of Zhong, Bohns, and Gino (2010).黑暗环境会促使抛硬币任务中的人不诚实:对钟、博恩斯和吉诺(2010 年)实验 1 的预先注册的概念复制。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 21;18(12):e0294484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294484. eCollection 2023.
2
Warning 'Don't spread' versus 'Don't be a spreader' to prevent the COVID-19 pandemic.警告“不要传播”与“不要成为传播者”以预防新冠疫情。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 23;7(9):200793. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200793. eCollection 2020 Sep.