Mackey Katherine, Veazie Stephanie, Anderson Johanna, Bourne Donald, Peterson Kim
Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(Suppl 3):954-963. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06257-4. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Despite evidence that medications to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) are effective, most people who could benefit from this treatment do not receive it. This rapid review synthesizes evidence on current barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine/naloxone and naltrexone at the patient, provider, and system levels to inform future interventions aimed at expanding treatment.
We systematically searched numerous bibliographic databases through May 2020 and selected studies published since 2014. Study selection, data abstraction, coding of barriers and facilitators, and quality assessment were first completed by one reviewer and checked by a second.
We included 40 studies of buprenorphine (5 also discussed naltrexone). Four types of patient and provider-level barriers to OUD medication use emerged-stigma related to OUD medications, treatment experiences and beliefs (positive or negative), logistical issues (time and costs as well as insurance and regulatory requirements), and knowledge (high or low) of OUD and the role of medications. Stigma was the most common barrier among patients, while logistical issues were the most common barriers among providers. Facilitators for both patients and providers included peer supports. Most administrator-identified or system-level barriers and facilitators fit into the category of logistical issues. We have moderate confidence in buprenorphine findings but low confidence in naltrexone findings due to the small number of studies.
Stigma, treatment experiences, logistical issues, and knowledge gaps are the main barriers associated with low utilization of OUD medications. These barriers can overlap and mutually reinforce each other, but given that, it is plausible that reducing one barrier may lead to reductions in others. The highest priority for future research is to evaluate interventions to reduce stigma. Other priorities for future research include better identification of barriers and facilitators for specific populations, such as those with OUD related to prescription opioids, and for naltrexone use.
PROSPERO; CRD42019133394.
尽管有证据表明用于治疗阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)的药物是有效的,但大多数能从这种治疗中获益的人却没有接受治疗。本快速综述综合了患者、提供者和系统层面上当前阻碍丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮和纳曲酮使用的因素及促进因素的证据,为未来旨在扩大治疗的干预措施提供参考。
我们系统检索了截至2020年5月的众多文献数据库,并选取了2014年以来发表的研究。研究筛选、数据提取、阻碍因素和促进因素的编码以及质量评估首先由一名评审员完成,然后由另一名评审员进行核对。
我们纳入了40项关于丁丙诺啡的研究(其中5项也讨论了纳曲酮)。出现了四类患者和提供者层面上阻碍使用OUD药物的因素——与OUD药物相关的污名、治疗经历和信念(积极或消极)、后勤问题(时间和成本以及保险和监管要求)以及对OUD和药物作用的了解(高或低)。污名是患者中最常见的阻碍因素,而后勤问题是提供者中最常见的阻碍因素。患者和提供者的促进因素都包括同伴支持。大多数管理者确定的或系统层面的阻碍因素和促进因素都属于后勤问题范畴。由于研究数量较少,我们对丁丙诺啡研究结果的信心中等,但对纳曲酮研究结果的信心较低。
污名、治疗经历、后勤问题和知识差距是与OUD药物利用率低相关的主要阻碍因素。这些阻碍因素可能相互重叠并相互强化,但即便如此,减少一个阻碍因素可能会导致其他阻碍因素的减少,这似乎是合理的。未来研究的最高优先事项是评估减少污名的干预措施。未来研究的其他优先事项包括更好地识别特定人群(如与处方阿片类药物相关的OUD患者)以及纳曲酮使用的阻碍因素和促进因素。
PROSPERO;CRD42019133394。