ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.
ICMR-National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Nehru Nagar, National Highway No. 4, Belagavi, Karnataka, 590010, India.
Parasitol Res. 2021 Jan;120(1):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06950-7. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
DEC or ivermectin (IVM) in combination with albendazole (ALB) has been the recommended strategy of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) since 2000. Despite effective population coverage (> 65%) with several rounds of MDA with DEC or combination of DEC plus ALB, microfilariae persist in few individuals and they continue to be the source of infection for transmitting LF. We report an individual's variability in response to DEC by defining the response as complete absence of microfilaria (mf) (post-treatment mf count = 0) and non-response as presence of mf (post-treatment mf count ≥ 1). We analyzed follow-up data on individual's response to treatment from two randomized clinical trials in which 46 microfilaremic individuals were treated with single-dose DEC (6 mg/kg body weight). They were classified into low, medium, and high mf density categories based on their pre-treatment mf counts. Of the 46 individuals, 65.2% have not responded throughout the 12-month post-treatment period. Application of a logistic regression model with fixed (age, gender, mf density, post-treatment time, and their interactions) and random (individual's response over time) effects indicated that treatment response is independent of age, gender, and time. The overall treatment response increases in low and decreases in high mf density categories. Furthermore, the estimates for the random coefficients model showed that there is a greater variability in response between individuals over post-treatment time. The results substantiate that individual variation in response to DEC exists which indicate the importance of studying the parasite as well as host genetic factors associated with DEC action.
自 2000 年以来,DEC 或伊维菌素 (IVM) 联合阿苯达唑 (ALB) 一直是全球消灭淋巴丝虫病规划 (GPELF) 推荐的策略。尽管已经进行了几轮 MDA,有效覆盖了 (>65%)的人群,使用 DEC 或 DEC 加 ALB 的组合,但微丝蚴仍在少数人身上存在,并且它们仍然是传播 LF 的感染源。我们通过定义无微丝蚴(mf)(治疗后 mf 计数=0)为完全无反应,有微丝蚴(治疗后 mf 计数≥1)为有反应,来报告个体对 DEC 的反应差异。我们分析了两项随机临床试验中个体对治疗反应的随访数据,其中 46 名微丝蚴血症患者接受了单次剂量 DEC(6mg/kg 体重)治疗。他们根据治疗前 mf 计数分为低、中、高 mf 密度类别。在 46 名个体中,65.2%的个体在整个 12 个月的治疗后期间都没有反应。应用固定(年龄、性别、mf 密度、治疗后时间及其相互作用)和随机(个体随时间的反应)效应的逻辑回归模型表明,治疗反应与年龄、性别和时间无关。总体治疗反应在低 mf 密度类别中增加,在高 mf 密度类别中降低。此外,随机系数模型的估计表明,个体在治疗后时间内的反应存在更大的变异性。这些结果证实了个体对 DEC 的反应存在差异,这表明研究寄生虫以及与 DEC 作用相关的宿主遗传因素的重要性。