Suppr超能文献

加利福尼亚北部一家健康计划中,中年和老年人健康社会决定因素和社会风险的种族和民族差异。

Racial-ethnic differences in prevalence of social determinants of health and social risks among middle-aged and older adults in a Northern California health plan.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California, United States of America.

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240822. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDoHs) and social risks (SRs) have been associated with adverse health and healthcare utilization and racial/ethnic disparities. However, there is limited information about the prevalence of SRs in non-"safety net" adult populations and how SRs differ by race/ethnicity, age, education, and income.

METHODS

We analyzed weighted survey data for 16,247 White, 1861 Black, 2895 Latino, 1554 Filipino, and 1289 Chinese adults aged 35 to 79 who responded to the 2011 or 2014/2015 Kaiser Permanente Northern California Member Health Survey. We compared age-standardized prevalence estimates of SDoHs (education, household income, marital status) and SRs (financial worry, cost-related reduced medication use and fruit/vegetable consumption, chronic stress, harassment/discrimination, health-related beliefs) across racial/ethnic groups for ages 35 to 64 and 65 to 79.

RESULTS

SDoHs and SRs differed by race/ethnicity and age group, and SRs differed by levels of education and income. In both age groups, Blacks, Latinos, and Filipinos were more likely than Whites to be in the lower income category and be worried about their financial situation. Compared to Whites, cost-related reduced medication use was higher among Blacks, and cost-related reduced fruit/vegetable consumption was higher among Blacks and Latinos. Younger adults were more likely than older adults to experience chronic stress and financial worry. Racial/ethnic disparities in income were observed within similar levels of education. Differences in prevalence of SRs by levels of education and income were wider within than across racial/ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this non-"safety net" adult health plan population, Blacks, Latinos, and Filipinos had a higher prevalence of social risks than Whites and Chinese, and prevalence of social risks differed by age group. Our results support the assessment and EHR documentation of SDoHs and social risks and use of this information to understand and address drivers of racial/ethnic disparities in health and healthcare use.

摘要

背景

健康的社会决定因素(SDoHs)和社会风险(SRs)与不良健康和医疗保健利用以及种族/民族差异有关。然而,关于非“安全网”成年人群体中社会风险的流行程度以及社会风险如何因种族/民族、年龄、教育程度和收入而有所不同的信息有限。

方法

我们分析了 2011 年或 2014/2015 年 Kaiser Permanente 北加州会员健康调查中回应的 16247 名白人、1861 名黑人、2895 名拉丁裔、1554 名菲律宾人和 1289 名 35 至 79 岁的中国成年人的加权调查数据。我们比较了 35 至 64 岁和 65 至 79 岁年龄组中不同种族/民族群体的 SDoHs(教育、家庭收入、婚姻状况)和 SRs(财务担忧、与成本相关的药物使用减少和水果/蔬菜摄入减少、慢性压力、骚扰/歧视、与健康相关的信念)的标准化年龄患病率估计值。

结果

SDoHs 和 SRs 因种族/民族和年龄组而异,SRs 因教育程度和收入水平而异。在两个年龄组中,黑人、拉丁裔和菲律宾裔比白人更有可能处于低收入阶层,并对自己的财务状况感到担忧。与白人相比,黑人更有可能因与成本相关的药物使用减少,而黑人和拉丁裔更有可能因与成本相关的水果/蔬菜摄入减少。年轻成年人比老年人更容易经历慢性压力和财务担忧。在类似的教育水平内观察到收入方面的种族/民族差异。在不同的教育和收入水平之间,社会风险的流行率差异大于种族/民族群体之间的差异。

结论

在这个非“安全网”成年健康计划人群中,黑人、拉丁裔和菲律宾裔比白人以及中国人更容易出现社会风险,社会风险的流行率因年龄组而异。我们的研究结果支持对 SDoHs 和社会风险进行评估和 EHR 记录,并利用这些信息来了解和解决健康和医疗保健使用中的种族/民族差异的驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527d/7641349/549e03118416/pone.0240822.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验