Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0241662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241662. eCollection 2020.
The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented public health threat, both in scope and response. With no vaccine available, the public is advised to practice non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) including social distancing, mask-wearing, and washing hands. However, little is known about public perceptions of the effectiveness of these measures, and high perceived effectiveness is likely to be critical in order to achieve widespread adoption of NPI.
In May 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among U.S. adults (N = 3,474). The primary outcome was a six-item measure assessing perceived effectiveness of recommended behaviors to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection from 1 (not at all effective) to 5 (extremely effective). The sample was divided into "higher" and "lower" perceived effectiveness groups. Covariates included demographics, healthcare characteristics, and health beliefs. Variables that were significant at p<0.01 in bivariate analyses were entered into a multivariable logistic regression and a best-fit model was created using a cutoff of p<0.01 to stay in the model.
Mean age was 45.5 years and most participants were non-Hispanic White (63%) and female (52.4%). The high perceived effectiveness group was slightly larger than the low perceived effectiveness group (52.7% vs. 47.3%). Almost all health belief variables were significant in the best-fit regression model. COVID-19-related worry (aOR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.64-2.02), and perceived threat to physical health (aOR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.20-1.45) were positively associated with perceived effectiveness while perceived severity of COVID-19 (0.84; 95% CI = 0.73-0.96) and perceived likelihood of infection (0.85; 95% CI = 0.77-0.94) switched directions in the adjusted model and were negatively associated with perceived effectiveness.
This research indicates people generally believe NPI are effective, but there was variability based on health beliefs and there are mixed rates of engagement in these behaviors. Public health efforts should focus on increasing perceived severity and threat of SARS-CoV-2-related disease, while promoting NPI as effective in reducing threat.
COVID-19 大流行是一场前所未有的公共卫生威胁,无论是在规模还是应对方面。由于没有疫苗可用,建议公众采取非药物干预措施(NPI),包括社交距离、戴口罩和洗手。然而,公众对这些措施的有效性的看法知之甚少,而高认知有效性很可能是广泛采用 NPI 的关键。
2020 年 5 月,我们对美国成年人(N=3474)进行了横断面调查。主要结果是一项六项措施,评估预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染的建议行为的有效性,从 1(一点也不有效)到 5(非常有效)。样本分为“高”和“低”感知有效性组。协变量包括人口统计学、医疗保健特征和健康信念。在单变量分析中具有统计学意义的变量(p<0.01)被纳入多变量逻辑回归,使用 p<0.01 的截止值来创建最佳拟合模型以保留在模型中。
平均年龄为 45.5 岁,大多数参与者是非西班牙裔白人(63%)和女性(52.4%)。高感知有效性组略大于低感知有效性组(52.7%对 47.3%)。几乎所有健康信念变量在最佳拟合回归模型中均具有统计学意义。与 COVID-19 相关的担忧(aOR=1.82;95%CI=1.64-2.02)和对身体健康威胁的感知(aOR=1.32;95%CI=1.20-1.45)与感知有效性呈正相关,而 COVID-19 的感知严重程度(0.84;95%CI=0.73-0.96)和感染可能性的感知(0.85;95%CI=0.77-0.94)在调整后的模型中方向相反,与感知有效性呈负相关。
这项研究表明,人们普遍认为 NPI 是有效的,但基于健康信念存在差异,并且这些行为的参与率也参差不齐。公共卫生工作应侧重于提高对 SARS-CoV-2 相关疾病的严重程度和威胁的认识,同时宣传 NPI 可有效降低威胁。