Fan Hao, Fife Kenneth H, Cox Dena, Cox Anthony D, Zimet Gregory D
a Department of Epidemiology , Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
b Department of Medicine , Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
AIDS Care. 2018 Aug;30(8):1062-1069. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1442555. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
Much of the research examining predictors of HIV testing has used retrospective self-report to assess HIV testing.
therefore, may be subject to recall bias and to difficulties determining the direction of associations. In this prospective study, we administered surveys to women in community clinics to identify predictors of subsequent observed HIV testing, overcoming these limitations. Eighty-three percent were tested. In the adjusted multivariable model, being born in the U.S., perceived benefits of testing, worries about being infected with HIV, having had more than 15 lifetime sexual partners, and having had one or more casual sexual partners in the previous three months predicted acceptance of testing. Perceived obstacles to testing predicted non-acceptance. Those who had never been tested for HIV and those tested two to five years previously had greater odds of test acceptance than those who had been tested within the last year. The findings from this study with observed testing as the outcome, confirm some of the results from retrospective, self-report studies. Participants made largely rational decisions about testing, reflecting assessments of their risk and their history of HIV testing. Health beliefs are potentially modifiable through behavioral intervention, and such interventions might result in greater acceptance of testing.
HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; AIDS: acquired immune deficiency syndrome; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ACASI: audio computer-assisted self-interview; TRA: theory of reasoned action; HBM: Health Belief Model; STI: sexually transmitted infection; STD: Sexually Transmitted Disease; AOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
许多研究艾滋病病毒检测预测因素的研究都采用回顾性自我报告来评估艾滋病病毒检测情况。
因此,可能会受到回忆偏差以及确定关联方向困难的影响。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们对社区诊所的女性进行了调查,以确定后续观察到的艾滋病病毒检测的预测因素,克服了这些局限性。83%的人接受了检测。在调整后的多变量模型中,在美国出生、认为检测有益、担心感染艾滋病病毒、一生中有超过15个性伴侣以及在过去三个月内有一个或多个临时性伴侣可预测检测接受情况。认为检测存在障碍可预测不接受检测。从未接受过艾滋病病毒检测的人和两到五年前接受过检测的人比去年接受过检测的人接受检测的几率更高。这项以观察到的检测结果为结局的研究结果证实了回顾性自我报告研究的一些结果。参与者在检测方面做出了很大程度上理性的决定,反映了对自身风险和艾滋病病毒检测史的评估。健康信念有可能通过行为干预得到改变,这样的干预可能会导致更高的检测接受率。
HIV:人类免疫缺陷病毒;AIDS:获得性免疫缺陷综合征;CDC:疾病控制与预防中心;ACASI:音频计算机辅助自我访谈;TRA:理性行动理论;HBM:健康信念模型;STI:性传播感染;STD:性传播疾病;AOR:调整后的优势比;CI:置信区间。