Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brain. 2020 Dec 5;143(11):3422-3434. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa335.
Parkinson's disease is clinically defined by bradykinesia, along with rigidity and tremor. However, the severity of these motor signs is greatly variable between individuals, particularly the presence or absence of tremor. This variability in tremor relates to variation in cognitive/motivational impairment, as well as the spatial distribution of neurodegeneration in the midbrain and dopamine depletion in the striatum. Here we ask whether interindividual heterogeneity in tremor symptoms could account for the puzzlingly large variability in the effects of dopaminergic medication on reinforcement learning, a fundamental cognitive function known to rely on dopamine. Given that tremor-dominant and non-tremor Parkinson's disease patients have different dopaminergic phenotypes, we hypothesized that effects of dopaminergic medication on reinforcement learning differ between tremor-dominant and non-tremor patients. Forty-three tremor-dominant and 20 non-tremor patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited to be tested both OFF and ON dopaminergic medication (200/50 mg levodopa-benserazide), while 22 age-matched control subjects were recruited to be tested twice OFF medication. Participants performed a reinforcement learning task designed to dissociate effects on learning rate from effects on motivational choice (i.e. the tendency to 'Go/NoGo' in the face of reward/threat of punishment). In non-tremor patients, dopaminergic medication improved reward-based choice, replicating previous studies. In contrast, in tremor-dominant patients, dopaminergic medication improved learning from punishment. Formal modelling showed divergent computational effects of dopaminergic medication as a function of Parkinson's disease motor phenotype, with a modulation of motivational choice bias and learning rate in non-tremor and tremor patients, respectively. This finding establishes a novel cognitive/motivational difference between tremor and non-tremor Parkinson's disease patients, and highlights the importance of considering motor phenotype in future work.
帕金森病临床上定义为运动迟缓,同时伴有僵硬和震颤。然而,这些运动迹象在个体之间的严重程度差异很大,尤其是震颤的存在与否。震颤的这种可变性与认知/动机损伤的变化以及中脑的神经退行性变的空间分布和纹状体中的多巴胺耗竭有关。在这里,我们想知道震颤症状的个体间异质性是否可以解释多巴胺能药物对强化学习的影响的令人困惑的大变异,强化学习是一种已知依赖多巴胺的基本认知功能。鉴于震颤为主型和非震颤型帕金森病患者具有不同的多巴胺表型,我们假设多巴胺能药物对强化学习的影响在震颤为主型和非震颤型患者之间存在差异。招募了 43 名震颤为主型和 20 名非震颤型帕金森病患者,在停用和使用多巴胺能药物(200/50mg 左旋多巴-卡比多巴)时进行测试,同时招募了 22 名年龄匹配的对照者,在停用药物两次时进行测试。参与者执行了一项强化学习任务,旨在区分学习率的影响和动机选择的影响(即在奖励/惩罚威胁面前的“Go/NoGo”倾向)。在非震颤型患者中,多巴胺能药物改善了基于奖励的选择,这与之前的研究一致。相比之下,在震颤为主型患者中,多巴胺能药物改善了对惩罚的学习。正式模型显示,多巴胺能药物的计算效应随帕金森病运动表型的不同而不同,在非震颤和震颤患者中分别调节动机选择偏差和学习率。这一发现确立了震颤和非震颤帕金森病患者之间的一种新的认知/动机差异,并强调了在未来工作中考虑运动表型的重要性。